37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Pipeline Embolization Device for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

          Endoluminal reconstruction with flow diverting devices represents a novel constructive technique for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. We present the results of the first prospective multicenter trial of a flow-diverting construct for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS:

          Patients with unruptured aneurysms that were wide-necked (>4 mm), had unfavorable dome/neck ratios (<1.5), or had failed previous therapy were enrolled in the PITA trial between January and May 2007 at 4 (3 European and 1 South American) centers. Aneurysms were treated with the PED with or without adjunctive coil embolization. All patients underwent clinical evaluation at 30 and 180 days and conventional angiography 180 days after treatment. Angiographic results were adjudicated by an experienced neuroradiologist at a nonparticipating site.

          RESULTS:

          Thirty-one patients with 31 intracranial aneurysms (6 men; 42–76 years of age; average age, 54.6 years) were treated during the study period. Twenty-eight aneurysms arose from the ICA (5 cavernous, 15 parophthalmic, 4 superior hypophyseal, and 4 posterior communicating segments), 1 from the MCA, 1 from the vertebral artery, and 1 from the vertebrobasilar junction. Mean aneurysm size was 11.5 mm, and mean neck size was 5.8 mm. Twelve (38.7%) aneurysms had failed (or recurred after) a previous endovascular treatment. PED placement was technically successful in 30 of 31 patients (96.8%). Most aneurysms were treated with either 1 ( n = 18) or 2 ( n = 11) PEDs. Fifteen aneurysms (48.4%) were treated with a PED alone, while 16 were treated with both PED and embolization coils. Two patients experienced major periprocedural stroke. Follow-up angiography demonstrated complete aneurysm occlusion in 28 (93.3%) of the 30 patients who underwent angiographic follow-up. No significant in-construct stenosis (≥50%) was identified at follow-up angiography.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          Intracranial aneurysm treatment with the PED is technically feasible and can be achieved with a safety profile analogous to that reported for stent-supported coil embolization. PED treatment elicited a very high rate (93%) of complete angiographic occlusion at 6 months in a population of the most challenging anatomic subtypes of cerebral aneurysms.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
          ajnr
          ajnr
          AJNR
          AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
          American Society of Neuroradiology
          0195-6108
          1936-959X
          January 2011
          : 32
          : 1
          : 34-40
          Affiliations
          [1] aFrom the Neurointerventional Service (P.K.N.), Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
          [2] bDepartment of Neurosurgery (P.L.), Eneri Instituto Medico, Buenos Aires, Argentina
          [3] cDepartment of Neuroradiology (I.S.), National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
          [4] dDepartment of Neuroradiology (S.G.W.), Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
          [5] eDepartment of Neuroradiology (I.W.), University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
          [6] fDepartment of Neurosurgery (D.F.), Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
          Author notes
          Please address correspondence to: David Fiorella, MD, PhD, Department of Neurosurgery, Cerebrovascular Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook University Hospital, Health Sciences Center 080, Stony Brook, NY, e-mail: dfiorella@ 123456notes.cc.sunysb.edu
          Article
          PMC7964968 PMC7964968 7964968 10-00997
          10.3174/ajnr.A2421
          7964968
          21148256
          a780d308-4095-4bd7-add7-f157923a1de6
          Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology

          Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

          History
          : 20 September 2010
          : 12 October 2010
          Categories
          Expedited Publication

          Comments

          Comment on this article