23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Satellite sensor requirements for monitoring essential biodiversity variables of coastal ecosystems

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 11 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 11 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 23 , 24 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42
      Ecological Applications
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.
      aquatic, coastal zone, ecology, essential biodiversity variables, H4 imaging, hyperspectral, remote sensing, vegetation, wetland

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The biodiversity and high productivity of coastal terrestrial and aquatic habitats are the foundation for important benefits to human societies around the world. These globally distributed habitats need frequent and broad systematic assessments, but field surveys only cover a small fraction of these areas. Satellite‐based sensors can repeatedly record the visible and near‐infrared reflectance spectra that contain the absorption, scattering, and fluorescence signatures of functional phytoplankton groups, colored dissolved matter, and particulate matter near the surface ocean, and of biologically structured habitats (floating and emergent vegetation, benthic habitats like coral, seagrass, and algae). These measures can be incorporated into Essential Biodiversity Variables ( EBVs), including the distribution, abundance, and traits of groups of species populations, and used to evaluate habitat fragmentation. However, current and planned satellites are not designed to observe the EBVs that change rapidly with extreme tides, salinity, temperatures, storms, pollution, or physical habitat destruction over scales relevant to human activity. Making these observations requires a new generation of satellite sensors able to sample with these combined characteristics: (1) spatial resolution on the order of 30 to 100‐m pixels or smaller; (2) spectral resolution on the order of 5 nm in the visible and 10 nm in the short‐wave infrared spectrum (or at least two or more bands at 1,030, 1,240, 1,630, 2,125, and/or 2,260 nm) for atmospheric correction and aquatic and vegetation assessments; (3) radiometric quality with signal to noise ratios ( SNR) above 800 (relative to signal levels typical of the open ocean), 14‐bit digitization, absolute radiometric calibration <2%, relative calibration of 0.2%, polarization sensitivity <1%, high radiometric stability and linearity, and operations designed to minimize sunglint; and (4) temporal resolution of hours to days. We refer to these combined specifications as H4 imaging. Enabling H4 imaging is vital for the conservation and management of global biodiversity and ecosystem services, including food provisioning and water security. An agile satellite in a 3‐d repeat low‐Earth orbit could sample 30‐km swath images of several hundred coastal habitats daily. Nine H4 satellites would provide weekly coverage of global coastal zones. Such satellite constellations are now feasible and are used in various applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The magnitude of global marine species diversity.

          The question of how many marine species exist is important because it provides a metric for how much we do and do not know about life in the oceans. We have compiled the first register of the marine species of the world and used this baseline to estimate how many more species, partitioned among all major eukaryotic groups, may be discovered. There are ∼226,000 eukaryotic marine species described. More species were described in the past decade (∼20,000) than in any previous one. The number of authors describing new species has been increasing at a faster rate than the number of new species described in the past six decades. We report that there are ∼170,000 synonyms, that 58,000-72,000 species are collected but not yet described, and that 482,000-741,000 more species have yet to be sampled. Molecular methods may add tens of thousands of cryptic species. Thus, there may be 0.7-1.0 million marine species. Past rates of description of new species indicate there may be 0.5 ± 0.2 million marine species. On average 37% (median 31%) of species in over 100 recent field studies around the world might be new to science. Currently, between one-third and two-thirds of marine species may be undescribed, and previous estimates of there being well over one million marine species appear highly unlikely. More species than ever before are being described annually by an increasing number of authors. If the current trend continues, most species will be discovered this century. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity

            More than 500 controlled experiments have collectively suggested that biodiversity loss reduces ecosystem productivity and stability. Yet the importance of biodiversity in sustaining the world’s ecosystems remains controversial, largely because of the lack of validation in nature, where strong abiotic forcing and complex interactions are assumed to swamp biodiversity effects. Here we test this assumption by analysing 133 estimates reported in 67 field studies that statistically separated the effects of biodiversity on biomass production from those of abiotic forcing. Contrary to the prevailing opinion of the previous two decades that biodiversity would have rare or weak effects in nature, we show that biomass production increases with species richness in a wide range of wild taxa and ecosystems. In fact, after controlling for environmental covariates, increases in biomass with biodiversity are stronger in nature than has previously been documented in experiments and comparable to or stronger than the effects of other well-known drivers of productivity, including climate and nutrient availability. These results are consistent with the collective experimental evidence that species richness increases community biomass production, and suggest that the role of biodiversity in maintaining productive ecosystems should figure prominently in global change science and policy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems.

              Salt marshes are among the most abundant, fertile, and accessible coastal habitats on earth, and they provide more ecosystem services to coastal populations than any other environment. Since the Middle Ages, humans have manipulated salt marshes at a grand scale, altering species composition, distribution, and ecosystem function. Here, we review historic and contemporary human activities in marsh ecosystems--exploitation of plant products; conversion to farmland, salt works, and urban land; introduction of non-native species; alteration of coastal hydrology; and metal and nutrient pollution. Unexpectedly, diverse types of impacts can have a similar consequence, turning salt marsh food webs upside down, dramatically increasing top down control. Of the various impacts, invasive species, runaway consumer effects, and sea level rise represent the greatest threats to salt marsh ecosystems. We conclude that the best way to protect salt marshes and the services they provide is through the integrated approach of ecosystem-based management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                carib@usf.edu
                Journal
                Ecol Appl
                Ecol Appl
                10.1002/(ISSN)1939-5582
                EAP
                Ecological Applications
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1051-0761
                06 March 2018
                April 2018
                : 28
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/eap.2018.28.issue-3 )
                : 749-760
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] College of Marine Science University of South Florida 140 7th Avenue South Saint Petersburg Florida 33701 USA
                [ 2 ] School of Engineering University of California Merced 5200 N. Lake Road Merced California 95340 USA
                [ 3 ] Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology University of Maryland 5523 Research Park Drive Baltimore Maryland 21228 USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Geography University of Southern California Santa Barbara California 93106 USA
                [ 5 ] Applied Physics Lab Johns Hopkins University 11100 Johns Hopkins Road Laurel Maryland 20723 USA
                [ 6 ] Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego La Jolla California 92093 USA
                [ 7 ] Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia
                [ 8 ] Stetson University College of Law 1401 61st Street South Gulfport Florida 33707 USA
                [ 9 ] HySpeed Computing Miami Florida 33143 USA
                [ 10 ] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Exposure Research Laboratory Research Triangle Park Raleigh North Carolina 27711 USA
                [ 11 ] Ocean Ecology Laboratory Goddard Space Flight Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Greenbelt Maryland 20770 USA
                [ 12 ] Goddard Space Flight Center Science Systems and Applications Greenbelt Maryland 20770 USA
                [ 13 ] Naval Research Laboratory Washington D.C. 20375 USA
                [ 14 ] Department of Geography University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California 90095 USA
                [ 15 ] Goddard Institute for Space Studies Columbia University New York New York 10025 USA
                [ 16 ] City University of New York New York New York 10031 USA
                [ 17 ] School of Marine Sciences University of Maine Orono Maine 04469 USA
                [ 18 ] Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena California 91109 USA
                [ 19 ] Universities Space Research Association Goddard Space Flight Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Greenbelt Maryland 20770 USA
                [ 20 ] NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton New Jersey 08540 USA
                [ 21 ] Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado 80301 USA
                [ 22 ] Laboratorio de Sensores Remotos Universidad Simon Bolívar Sartenejas, Apartado Caracas 89000 Venezuela
                [ 23 ] Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University Palisades New York 10964 USA
                [ 24 ] College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon 97331 USA
                [ 25 ] Roffer's Ocean Fishing Forecasting Service 60 Westover Drive, West Melbourne Florida 32904 USA
                [ 26 ] Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven Germany
                [ 27 ] Stanford University Stanford California 94305 USA
                [ 28 ] Department of Marine Sciences University of Connecticut Groton Connecticut 06340 USA
                [ 29 ] Earth System Science and Policy University of North Dakota Grand Forks North Dakota 58202 USA
                [ 30 ] Bren School of Environmental Science and Management University of California Santa Barbara California 93106 USA
                [ 31 ] EcoQuants 508 East Haley Street Santa Barbara California 93103 USA
                [ 32 ] Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Cultural Plaza, 3215 Hull Road Gainesville Florida 32611 USA
                [ 33 ] Wallops Flight Facility NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Wallops Island, Virginia 23337 USA
                [ 34 ] Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole Massachusetts 02543 USA
                [ 35 ] University of California Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California 95064 USA
                [ 36 ] Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island Kingston Rhode Island 02881 USA
                [ 37 ] WET Labs/Sea‐Bird Scientific P.O. Box 518 Philomath Oregon 97370 USA
                [ 38 ] Airborne Science Program NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field California 94035 USA
                [ 39 ] Department of Earth and Oceanographic Science Bowdoin College Brunswick Maine 04011 USA
                [ 40 ] Geo‐Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands
                [ 41 ] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Ocean Biogeographic Information System Oostende Belgium
                [ 42 ] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Yale University New Haven Connecticut 06511 USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]E‐mail: carib@ 123456usf.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-5011
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-1298
                Article
                EAP1682
                10.1002/eap.1682
                5947264
                29509310
                a7e2ae60-b4c7-42a1-98ec-8317db15df56
                © 2018 The Authors Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Ecological Society of America.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 June 2017
                : 30 October 2017
                : 08 December 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 12, Words: 10992
                Funding
                Funded by: National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
                Funded by: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
                Award ID: NNX16AQ34G
                Award ID: NNX14AR62A
                Funded by: National Ocean Partnership Program
                Funded by: NOAA US Integrated Ocean Observing System/IOOS Program Office
                Funded by: Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management Ecosystem Studies program (BOEM)
                Award ID: MC15AC00006
                Categories
                Article
                Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                eap1682
                April 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.8.2 mode:remove_FC converted:11.05.2018

                aquatic,coastal zone,ecology,essential biodiversity variables,h4 imaging,hyperspectral,remote sensing,vegetation,wetland

                Comments

                Comment on this article