4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Taxon-specific responses to different forestry treatments in a temperate forest

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are only few studies that explore the ecological consequences of forest management on several organism groups. We studied the short-term effects of four forestry treatments including preparation cutting, clear-cutting, retention tree group and gap-cutting in a temperate managed forest on the assemblage structure of understory plants, enchytraeid worms, spiders and ground beetles. Here we show, that the effect of treatments on the different facets of assemblage structure was taxon-specific. Clear-cutting and retention tree group strongly impoverished enchytraeids assemblages. Even if the species richness and cover of plants increased in clear-cutting and gap-cutting, their species composition moderately changed after treatments. For spiders only their species composition was influenced by the treatments, while the response of ground beetles was slightly affected. Short-term effect of forest management interventions on biodiversity might be compensated by the dispersal (spiders, ground beetles) and resilience (plants) of organism groups, however sedentary soil organism showed high sensitivity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).

          The ground beetles from the speciose beetle family Carabidae and, since their emergence in the Tertiary, have populated all habitats except deserts. Our knowledge about carabids is biased toward species living in north-temperate regions. Most carabids are predatory, consume a wide range of food types, and experience food shortages in the field. Feeding on both plant and animal material and scavenging are probably more significant than currently acknowledged. The most important mortality sources are abiotic factors and predators; pathogens and parasites can be important for some developmental stages. Although competition among larvae and adults does occur, the importance of competition as a community organization is not proven. Carabids are abundant in agricultural fields all over the world and may be important natural enemies of agricultural pests.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe.

            Past and present pressures on forest resources have led to a drastic decrease in the surface area of unmanaged forests in Europe. Changes in forest structure, composition, and dynamics inevitably lead to changes in the biodiversity of forest-dwelling species. The possible biodiversity gains and losses due to forest management (i.e., anthropogenic pressures related to direct forest resource use), however, have never been assessed at a pan-European scale. We used meta-analysis to review 49 published papers containing 120 individual comparisons of species richness between unmanaged and managed forests throughout Europe. We explored the response of different taxonomic groups and the variability of their response with respect to time since abandonment and intensity of forest management. Species richness was slightly higher in unmanaged than in managed forests. Species dependent on forest cover continuity, deadwood, and large trees (bryophytes, lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles) and carabids were negatively affected by forest management. In contrast, vascular plant species were favored. The response for birds was heterogeneous and probably depended more on factors such as landscape patterns. The global difference in species richness between unmanaged and managed forests increased with time since abandonment and indicated a gradual recovery of biodiversity. Clearcut forests in which the composition of tree species changed had the strongest effect on species richness, but the effects of different types of management on taxa could not be assessed in a robust way because of low numbers of replications in the management-intensity classes. Our results show that some taxa are more affected by forestry than others, but there is a need for research into poorly studied species groups in Europe and in particular locations. Our meta-analysis supports the need for a coordinated European research network to study and monitor the biodiversity of different taxa in managed and unmanaged forests.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Should Environmental Filtering be Abandoned?

              Environmental filtering, where the environment selects against certain species, is thought to be a major mechanism structuring communities. However, recent criticisms cast doubt on our ability to accurately infer filtering because competition can give rise to patterns identical to those caused by environmental filtering. While experiments can distinguish mechanisms, observational patterns are especially problematic. The environment determines community composition not only directly via survival, but also by influencing competition. If species population growth rates covary with environmental gradients, then outcomes of competitive exclusion will also vary with the environment. Here, we argue that observational studies remain valuable, but inferences about the importance of the environment cannot rely on compositional data alone, and that species abundances, population growth, or traits must be correlated with the environment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zoltan.elek2@gmail.com
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                19 November 2018
                19 November 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 16990
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0636 012X, GRID grid.424945.a, MTA Centre for Ecological Research, , Institute of Ecology and Botany, ; Vácrátót, Hungary
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2159 124X, GRID grid.417760.3, MTA Centre for Agricultural Research, , Agricultural Institute, ; Budapest, Hungary
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2149 4407, GRID grid.5018.c, MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, ; Budapest, Hungary
                [4 ]MTA Centre for Ecological Research, GINOP Sustainable Ecosystem Research Group, Tihany, Hungary
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2294 6276, GRID grid.5591.8, Department of Plant Systematics, , Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, ; Budapest, Hungary
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1015 7851, GRID grid.129553.9, Szent István University, Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, ; Gödöllő, Hungary
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-6300
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6591-2284
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4642-2703
                Article
                35159
                10.1038/s41598-018-35159-z
                6243015
                30451880
                a7eb8ca1-d06b-4bd8-9fa7-34035829924a
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 May 2018
                : 31 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100003549, Országos Tudományos Kutatási Alapprogramok (Hungarian Scientific Research Fund);
                Award ID: OTKA 111887
                Award ID: OTKA 111887
                Award ID: OTKA 111887
                Award ID: OTKA 111887
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Research Development and Innovation Office, Hungary (GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00019)
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article