16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Targeting the ERK Signaling Pathway in Melanoma

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The discovery of the role of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in melanomagenesis and its progression have opened a new era in the treatment of this tumor. Vemurafenib was the first specific kinase inhibitor approved for therapy of advanced melanomas harboring BRAF-activating mutations, followed by dabrafenib and encorafenib. However, despite the excellent results of first-generation kinase inhibitors in terms of response rate, the average duration of the response was short, due to the onset of genetic and epigenetic resistance mechanisms. The combination therapy with MEK inhibitors is an excellent strategy to circumvent drug resistance, with the additional advantage of reducing side effects due to the paradoxical reactivation of the MAPK pathway. The recent development of RAS and extracellular signal-related kinases (ERK) inhibitors promises to add new players for the ultimate suppression of this signaling pathway and the control of pathway-related drug resistance. In this review, we analyze the pharmacological, preclinical, and clinical trial data of the various MAPK pathway inhibitors, with a keen interest for their clinical applicability in the management of advanced melanoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references186

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Combined vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF-mutated melanoma.

          The combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes in patients with melanoma by preventing or delaying the onset of resistance observed with BRAF inhibitors alone. This randomized phase 3 study evaluated the combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib. We randomly assigned 495 patients with previously untreated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma to receive vemurafenib and cobimetinib (combination group) or vemurafenib and placebo (control group). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. The median progression-free survival was 9.9 months in the combination group and 6.2 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.68; P<0.001). The rate of complete or partial response in the combination group was 68%, as compared with 45% in the control group (P<0.001), including rates of complete response of 10% in the combination group and 4% in the control group. Progression-free survival as assessed by independent review was similar to investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Interim analyses of overall survival showed 9-month survival rates of 81% (95% CI, 75 to 87) in the combination group and 73% (95% CI, 65 to 80) in the control group. Vemurafenib and cobimetinib was associated with a nonsignificantly higher incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher, as compared with vemurafenib and placebo (65% vs. 59%), and there was no significant difference in the rate of study-drug discontinuation. The number of secondary cutaneous cancers decreased with the combination therapy. The addition of cobimetinib to vemurafenib was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival among patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma, at the cost of some increase in toxicity. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; coBRIM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01689519.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis.

            The generic mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway is shared by four distinct cascades, including the extracellular signal-related kinases (ERK1/2), Jun amino-terminal kinases (JNK1/2/3), p38-MAPK and ERK5. Mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) pathway is reported to be associated with the cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis. The literatures were searched extensively and this review was performed to review the role of MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease.

              RAS proteins are binary switches, cycling between ON and OFF states during signal transduction. These switches are normally tightly controlled, but in RAS-related diseases, such as cancer, RASopathies, and many psychiatric disorders, mutations in the RAS genes or their regulators render RAS proteins persistently active. The structural basis of the switch and many of the pathways that RAS controls are well known, but the precise mechanisms by which RAS proteins function are less clear. All RAS biology occurs in membranes: a precise understanding of RAS' interaction with membranes is essential to understand RAS action and to intervene in RAS-driven diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                25 March 2019
                March 2019
                : 20
                : 6
                : 1483
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health Science, University of Eastern Piedmont, via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
                [2 ]Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy; fava_paolo@ 123456yahoo.it
                [3 ]San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Division of Neuroscience, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy; casoni.filippo@ 123456hsr.it
                [4 ]Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: paola.savoia@ 123456med.uniupo.it (P.S.); cremona.ottavio@ 123456hsr.it (O.C.); Tel.: +39-0321-3733387 (P.S.); +39-02-26439112 (O.C.)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-8411
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-7458
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-8377
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9462-1040
                Article
                ijms-20-01483
                10.3390/ijms20061483
                6472057
                30934534
                a820679a-b496-4399-9ce5-457715dbd7e3
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 02 March 2019
                : 19 March 2019
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                erk pathway,target therapy,metastatic melanoma,braf inhibitors,mek inhibitors,erk inhibitors,nras inhibitors,melanoma treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article