17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Second-Generation central venous catheter in the prevention of bloodstream infection: a systematic review 1

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          to evaluate the effectiveness and safety in the use of second-generation central venous catheters impregnated in clorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine when compared with other catheters, being them impregnated or not, in order to prevent the bloodstream infection prevention.

          Method:

          systematic review with meta-analysis. Databases searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS/SciELO, Cochrane CENTRAL; search in Congress Proceedings and records from Clinical Trials.

          Results:

          1.235 studies were identified, 97 were pre-selected and 4 were included. In catheter-related bloodstream infection, there was no statistical significance between second-generation impregnated catheter compared with the non-impregnated ones, absolute relative risk 1,5% confidence interval 95% (3%-1%), relative risk 0,68 (confidence interval 95%, 0,40-1,15) and number needed to treat 66. In the sensitivity analysis, there was less bloodstream infection in impregnated catheters (relative risk 0,50, confidence interval 95%, 0,26-0,96). Lower colonization, absolute relative risk 9,6% (confidence interval 95%, 10% to 4%), relative risk 0,51 (confidence interval 95% from 0,38-0,85) and number needed to treat 5.

          Conclusion:

          the use of second-generation catheters was effective in reducing the catheter colonization and infection when a sensitivity analysis is performed. Future clinical trials are suggested to evaluate sepsis rates, mortality and adverse effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections: a randomized, controlled trial.

              Central venous catheter-related infections are a significant medical problem. Improved preventive measures are needed. To ascertain 1) effectiveness of a second-generation antiseptic-coated catheter in the prevention of microbial colonization and infection; 2) safety and tolerability of this device; 3) microbiology of infected catheters; and 4) propensity for the development of antiseptic resistance. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. 9 university-affiliated medical centers. 780 patients in intensive care units who required central venous catheterization. Patients received either a standard catheter or a catheter coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine. The authors assessed catheter colonization and catheter-related infection, characterized microbes by molecular typing, and determined their susceptibility to antiseptics. Patient tolerance of the catheter was monitored. Patients with the 2 types of catheters had similar demographic features, clinical interventions, laboratory values, and risk factors for infection. Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at the time of removal compared with control catheters (13.3 vs. 24.1 colonized catheters per 1000 catheter-days; P < 0.01). The center-stratified Cox regression hazard ratio for colonization controlling for sampling design and potentially confounding variables was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78). The rate of definitive catheter-related bloodstream infection was 1.24 per 1000 catheter-days (CI, 0.26 to 3.62 per 1000 catheter-days) for the control group versus 0.42 per 1000 catheter-days (CI, 0.01 to 2.34 per 1000 catheter-days) for the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.6). Coagulase-negative staphylococci and other gram-positive organisms were the most frequent microbes to colonize catheters. Noninfectious adverse events were similar in both groups. Antiseptic susceptibility was similar for microbes recovered from either group. The antiseptic catheter was not compared with an antibiotic-coated catheter, and no conclusion can be made regarding its effect on bloodstream infection. The second-generation chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine catheter is well tolerated. Antiseptic coating appears to reduce microbial colonization of the catheter compared with an uncoated catheter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
                Rev Lat Am Enfermagem
                rlae
                Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
                Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
                0104-1169
                1518-8345
                08 August 2016
                2016
                : 24
                : e2722
                Affiliations
                [2 ]RN, PhD, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
                [3 ]Doctoral Student, Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Adjunct Professor, Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
                [4 ]Doctoral Student, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. RN, Secretaria Estadual de Segurança Pública, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
                [5 ]PhD, Adjunct Professor, Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
                [6 ]PhD, Associate Professor, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 7 PhD, Associate Professor, Departamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Janislei Giseli Dorociaki Stocco Universidade Federal do Paraná Departamento de Enfermagem Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632 Jd. Botânico CEP: 80.210-170, Curitiba, PR, Brasil E-mail: janisleistocco@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                00405
                10.1590/1518-8345.0756.2722
                4990028
                27508901
                a8378c99-81c8-4856-bc8a-1b16588e0e9b

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

                History
                : 07 March 2015
                : 13 December 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 15, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 22, Pages: 1
                Categories
                Review Articles

                catheterization, central venous,catheter-related infection,colonization,sepsis,meta-analysis.

                Comments

                Comment on this article