8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Can journalistic “false balance” distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion?

      Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
      American Psychological Association (APA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Media critics have expressed concern that journalistic "false balance" can distort the public's perceptions of what ought to be noncontroversial subjects (e.g., climate change). I report several experiments testing the influence of presenting conflicting comments from 2 experts who disagree on an issue (balance condition) in addition to a complete count of the number of experts on a panel who favor either side. Compared with a control condition, who received only the complete count, participants in the balance condition gave ratings of the perceived agreement among the experts that did not discriminate as clearly between issues with and without strong expert consensus. Participants in the balance condition also perceived less agreement among the experts in general, and were less likely to think that there was enough agreement among experts on the high-consensus issues to guide government policy. Evidently, "false balance" can distort perceptions of expert opinion even when participants would seem to have all the information needed to correct for its influence.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
          Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
          American Psychological Association (APA)
          1939-2192
          1076-898X
          2016
          2016
          : 22
          : 1
          : 24-38
          Article
          10.1037/xap0000073
          26752513
          a852bbeb-0dbe-4ba9-903f-b8d504aa48a2
          © 2016
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article