Evaluation of the impact of Illumina error correction tools on de novo genome assembly

Abstract

Background

Recently, many standalone applications have been proposed to correct sequencing errors in Illumina data. The key idea is that downstream analysis tools such as de novo genome assemblers benefit from a reduced error rate in the input data. Surprisingly, a systematic validation of this assumption using state-of-the-art assembly methods is lacking, even for recently published methods.

Results

For twelve recent Illumina error correction tools (EC tools) we evaluated both their ability to correct sequencing errors and their ability to improve de novo genome assembly in terms of contig size and accuracy.

Conclusions

We confirm that most EC tools reduce the number of errors in sequencing data without introducing many new errors. However, we found that many EC tools suffer from poor performance in certain sequence contexts such as regions with low coverage or regions that contain short repeated or low-complexity sequences. Reads overlapping such regions are often ill-corrected in an inconsistent manner, leading to breakpoints in the resulting assemblies that are not present in assemblies obtained from uncorrected data. Resolving this systematic flaw in future EC tools could greatly improve the applicability of such tools.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1784-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.