Meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers.

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Surgery is the treatment of choice for perforated peptic ulcer disease. The aim of the present review was to compare the perioperative outcomes of acute laparoscopic versus open repair for peptic ulcer disease.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Trauma Acute Care Surg

Title: The journal of trauma and acute care surgery

Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

ISSN (Electronic): 2163-0763

ISSN (Print): 2163-0755

Publication date (Electronic): August 2018

Volume: 85

Issue: 2

Affiliations

[1 ] From the Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy (R.C, E.R.); University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (K.S.); Emergency Surgery and Trauma Surgery Unit, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy (S.D.S.); Department of Surgical Sciences (A.A.), University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Department of General Surgery (M.Z.), Policlinico San Pietro, Ponte San Pietro, Italy; Health Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia, Italy (I.A.); Department of Surgery (N.V.), Montichiari Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Emergency Surgery Unit, Cisanello Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy (M.C.); Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (K.S.), Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; and Department of Clinical Medicine (K.S.), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Article

DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001925

PubMed ID: 29659470

SO-VID: a87ce3e6-253c-45c3-95fc-4697766f037b

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 21

See all cited by