6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Early and Sustained Systemic and Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous Radiocontrast

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aims: To measure the extended renal hemodynamic changes induced by intravenous radiocontrast. Methods: Cross-ewes were studied in a randomized cross-over study. Intravenous saline or radiocontrast were administered, and continuous measurement of cardiac output and renal blood flow (RBF) was performed with flow probes. Results: Radiocontrast induced early but transient increases in cardiac output with vasodilatation, followed by return to baseline values within 2 h. There was an initial decline in RBF (–5.2 ± 4.5 vs. 2.1 ± 5.3%; p < 0.0001) and decreased renal vascular conductance (–4.0 ± 7.2 vs. 3.3 ± 7.1%, p < 0.0001; vasoconstriction). This renal vasoconstriction resolved within 2 h and was followed by sustained (72 h) renal vasodilatation with higher RBF (270 ± 13 vs. 236 ± 11 ml/min; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Radiocontrast induces short renal vasoconstriction followed by sustained vasodilatation and increased RBF. Short-term studies are not representative of the overall sustained renal hemodynamic effects of radiocontrast.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of saline, mannitol, and furosemide to prevent acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents.

          Injections of radiocontrast agents are a frequent cause of acute decreases in renal function, occurring most often in patients with chronic renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus. We prospectively studied 78 patients with chronic renal insufficiency (mean [+/- SD] serum creatinine concentration, 2.1 +/- 0.6 mg per deciliter [186 +/- 53 mumol per liter]) who underwent cardiac angiography. The patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.45 percent saline alone for 12 hours before and 12 hours after angiography, saline plus mannitol, or saline plus furosemide. The mannitol and furosemide were given just before angiography. Serum creatinine was measured before and for 48 hours after angiography, and urine was collected for 24 hours after angiography. An acute radiocontrast-induced decrease in renal function was defined as an increase in the base-line serum creatinine concentration of at least 0.5 mg per deciliter (44 mumol per liter) within 48 hours after the injection of radiocontrast agents. Twenty of the 78 patients (26 percent) had an increase in the serum creatinine concentration of at least 0.5 mg per deciliter after angiography. Among the 28 patients in the saline group, 3 (11 percent) had such an increase in serum creatinine, as compared with 7 of 25 in the mannitol group (28 percent) and 10 of 25 in the furosemide group (40 percent) (P = 0.05). The mean increase in serum creatinine 48 hours after angiography was significantly greater in the furosemide group (P = 0.01) than in the saline group. In patients with chronic renal insufficiency who are undergoing cardiac angiography, hydration with 0.45 percent saline provides better protection against acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents than does hydration with 0.45 percent saline plus mannitol or furosemide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Renal blood flow in experimental septic acute renal failure.

            Reduced renal blood flow (RBF) is considered central to the pathogenesis of septic acute renal failure (ARF). However, no controlled experimental studies have continuously assessed RBF during the development of severe septic ARF. We conducted a sequential animal study in seven female Merino sheep. Flow probes were implanted around the pulmonary and left renal arteries. Two weeks later, systemic hemodynamics and RBF were monitored continuously during a 48-h control period and, after a week, during a 48-h period of hyperdynamic sepsis induced by continuous Escherichia coli infusion. Infusion of E. coli induced hyperdynamic sepsis with significantly increased cardiac output (3.8+/-0.4 vs 9.8+/-1.1 l/min; P<0.05), decreased mean arterial pressure (89.2+/-3.2 vs 64.3+/-5.3 mm Hg; P<0.05), and increased total peripheral conductance (42.8+/-3.5 in controls vs 153.7+/-24.7 ml/min/mm Hg in septic animals; P<0.05). Hyperdynamic sepsis was associated with marked renal vasodilatation (renal conductance: 3.0+/-0.7 vs 11.4+/-3.4 ml/min/mm Hg; P<0.05) and a marked increase in RBF (262.3+/-47.7 vs 757.4+/-250.1 ml/min; P<0.05). Serum creatinine increased over 48 h (73+/-18 vs 305+/- micromol/l; P<0.05) whereas creatinine clearance decreased (95.5+/-25.9 vs 20.1+/-19.3 ml/min; P<0.05). After 24 h, urine output decreased from 1.4 to 0.3 ml/kg/h (P<0.05). Infusion of E. coli induced hyperdynamic sepsis and ARF. Septic ARF in this setting was associated with a marked increase in RBF and with renal vasodilatation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: A randomized trial

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2010
                June 2010
                31 March 2010
                : 29
                : 4
                : 339-346
                Affiliations
                aHoward Florey Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., bDepartment of Intensive Care and Department of Medicine, Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Vic., and cAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Prahran, Vic., Australia; dDivision of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada
                Article
                302721 Blood Purif 2010;29:339–346
                10.1159/000302721
                20357433
                a8a78e39-7ea6-45a4-993f-b3add2f9724d
                © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 02 October 2009
                : 11 May 2009
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, References: 30, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Renal vascular resistance,Iohexol,Nephropathy, contrast-induced,Angiography,Renal blood flow,Contrast medium,Vasoconstriction

                Comments

                Comment on this article