+1 Recommend
0 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      New Prospects for Research on Manipulation of Insect Vectors by Pathogens


      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          A growing number of studies demonstrate, or suggest, that vector-borne parasites manipulate phenotypic traits of their vectors and hosts in ways that increase contacts between them, and hence favour the parasites' transmission [1,2]. Understanding these processes is not only exciting for purely scientific reasons but also important because of their role in applied parasitology, such as epidemiology and medicine. The most frequently reported changes induced by vector-borne parasites are alterations of biting rates in vectors or of attractiveness in vertebrate hosts [3,4]. Our aim here is to elaborate further on some potentially interesting and important avenues for future research in this area. We begin this paper with a brief overview of the main mechanisms used by vectors to locate their vertebrate host, as it helps to grasp the fundamentals of the research on manipulation in vectors, as well as its current challenges. Bloodsucking insects have well-developed sensorial machinery to locate and choose their host [5]. Host location behaviour is usually organized into three areas which show considerable variation among vector species: (i) the appetitive search, (ii) the activation and orientation, and (iii) the attraction. The two last steps involve insect responses to external stimuli, mainly visual and odour cues, but also heat and to a lesser extent, water vapour and sound [5]. Vision is most widely used by diurnal insect vectors (e.g., blackflies, tsetse flies, several mosquitoes). The detection depends mainly on differences in colour contrast and intensity contrast; generally, flies are attracted to blue/black objects while they are repelled by yellow ones. Odour-mediated host-seeking has been more thoroughly studied and seems to be utilized by virtually all bloodsucking insects. The olfactory stimuli used by the insects are various, ranging from carbon dioxide to lactic acid, ammonia, acetone, octenol, phenolic components of urine, and sweat. Bloodsucking insects can be also very sensitive to heat [5]. Although some of these components (vision, olfaction, hearing) could be theoretically altered by parasites in ways that may be predicted to enhance parasite transmission, only a few have been considered. Bite more or bite better? Qualitative manipulation, according to which generalist bloodfeeding insects, once infected, would develop a feeding preference for hosts targeted by the parasite, is an underexplored scenario. Maximising transmission towards a suitable host could be achieved by parasites by inducing in the vector a sensory bias for host traits that are correlated with optimal suitability for the parasite. Qualitative manipulation could theoretically occur at two levels: (i) at the interspecific level, with infected vectors biting more than expected on suitable host species for the parasite and (ii) at the intraspecific level, when infected vectors prefer feeding on less-immune hosts or on individuals that are uninfected (and thus do not yet harbour potential competitors). In particular cases, however (e.g., Plasmodium), the reverse tendency might be expected in order to find a sexual partner of a different strain. To test for the qualitative manipulation hypothesis, a dual-port olfactometer could be used to quantify the behavioural responses of infected and uninfected insect vectors to volatiles emitted by different host species. For instance, Glossina palpalis gambiensis has a broad range of hosts in central Africa (humans, reptiles, bushbuck, and ox) and is the main vector of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense responsible for the medically important Human African trypanosomiasis. We would predict that once infected, flies are more attracted by human cues than by those of other vertebrates. Betrayed by smell. All kinds of diseases are associated with changes in the infected individual's odour profile [6–9]. These changes have generally been considered as nonspecific symptoms of infection with no adaptive value. However, since the publication of several recent studies [10–13], and especially Lacroix et al. [2] who showed that people infected with transmissible stages of malaria produced something attractive to mosquitoes, it seems clear that more research should be performed to explore the hypothesis that alterations in odour profiles could be adaptive manipulative changes exerted by vector-borne parasites to increase their transmission. Along the same idea, the hypothesis according to which parasites inhibit some of the processes through which certain hosts are less detected/chosen than others [14] deserves consideration. Experimental tests of these hypotheses could be based on the same device as before (i.e., a dual-port olfactometer) combined with a gas chromatography–electroantennograph approach to detect and identify allomone/kairomone eventually emitted by infected and uninfected vertebrates. Going beyond behaviour. In addition to greater consideration of the proximate mechanisms mediating parasite-induced changes in feeding behaviour, further research might benefit from also considering traits other than behavioural ones. Reduction of fecundity has been reported frequently in Plasmodium-infected mosquitoes [1]. Altering vector resource management may increase available nutrient reserves or avoid the cost of laying eggs, which in turn could enhance the vector's longevity and hence the parasite's overall transmission. Further experiments are clearly needed to confirm this interesting hypothesis [1]. Protozoan pathogens such as Plasmodium, Leishmania, and Trypanosoma also are able to evade the immune system of their vertebrate hosts by, for example, penetrating and multiplying within cells, varying their surface antigens, eliminating their protein coat, and modulating the host immune response, e.g., the maturation of the dendritic cells [15,16]. Malaria also manipulates the immune system of its mosquito hosts in two ways [17]. First, in the early stages of infection, it actively suppresses the encapsulation immune response within the mosquitoes. In addition, an indirect suppression occurs when mosquitoes (already infected or not) are fed with plasma of infected hosts. The underlying mechanisms are still unknown but there is a suggestion that this indirect suppression results from complex interactions between the vertebrate and the mosquito immune responses. The manipulation of the immune response is certainly an important way for the parasite to ensure its transmission. From phenotype to molecular mechanisms. More generally, studying the molecular cross talks (e.g., with proteomics tools, see for instance [18]) between parasites and vectors at several stages of their interaction should not only permit us to understand the proximate mechanisms causing alterations in feeding behaviour, but also to potentially discover new ways in which parasites increase their transmission. Such an approach would appear promising to understand who is actually running the show: the parasite, the host, both, or neither. Similarly, this approach could bring relevant information when applied to interactions among pathogens and their vertebrate hosts [19]. To go further in this direction, an important hurdle that would also need to be overcome is the development of a population biology view, assessing the populational polymorphism in these processes. This implies an automation of molecular techniques in order to provide high throughput datasets. Conflict of interest. Conflicts of interest in behavioural patterns naturally underlie any kind of manipulation. Mosquitoes, for example, would prefer to bite their hosts less frequently than what is optimal for transmission stages of the parasites [20]. Such conflicts can become quite complex if the parasite can manipulate several traits in its different hosts and change the manipulation according to its stage of development [21]. Conflicts between parasites are also expected when hosts harbour simultaneously transmissible and nontransmissible stages (both at the intraspecific and interspecific level). However, and unfortunately, very few studies consider these conflicts explicitly. How strong is the selection to manipulate the hosts? How strong is the selection to resist being manipulated? In addition to empirical approaches based on experimental infections, the understanding of these complex interspecific and intraspecific interactions would benefit from being explored from a theoretical point of view. Answers to such questions could bring studies of behavioural manipulation from interesting observations to predictive evolutionary biology. Research on vector–pathogen interactions has unfortunately a bright future given the increasing preoccupations caused by the emergence and the reemergence of numerous infectious diseases. Because traditional medical approaches do not always provide suitable solutions (e.g., too expensive for the countries concerned), fundamental investigations of the ecology and the evolution of vector and pathogen interactions remain a key aspect of the research in human and veterinary health. Additionally, attention should be directed towards investigations in a field setting, as behaviour in the laboratory may not reflect precisely that which occurs naturally. Behavioural manipulations of vectors are phenomena so complex that one single method cannot totally describe or understand them. For this reason, future research should benefit from the expertise of different disciplines. Responses to the questions asked will indeed need the integration of the concepts and techniques from epidemiology, behavioural and evolutionary ecology, medicine, neurobiology, physiology, and molecular biology. Despite the difficulty of performing such pluridisciplinary approaches, these efforts will undoubtedly provide a much better basis for understanding the evolution of parasitic manipulation in vectors. Although speculative in appearance, each of the scenarios mentioned above is legitimate from ecological and evolutionary points of view. At least because of this, and also because the above hypotheses would considerably change the way we control and model the transmission of the most harmful pathogens affecting humans, they should be verified.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes modulate the maturation of dendritic cells.

          The malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is one of the most successful human pathogens. Specific virulence factors remain poorly defined, although the adhesion of infected erythrocytes to the venular endothelium has been associated with some of the syndromes of severe disease. Immune responses cannot prevent the development of symptomatic infections throughout life, and clinical immunity to the disease develops only slowly during childhood. An understanding of the obstacles to the development of protective immunity is crucial for developing rational approaches to prevent the disease. Here we show that intact malaria-infected erythrocytes adhere to dendritic cells, inhibit the maturation of dendritic cells and subsequently reduce their capacity to stimulate T cells. These data demonstrate both a novel mechanism by which malaria parasites induce immune dysregulation and a functional role beyond endothelial adhesion for the adhesive phenotypes expressed at the surface of infected erythrocytes.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Manipulation of medically important insect vectors by their parasites.

            Many of the most harmful parasitic diseases are transmitted by blood-feeding insect vectors. During this stage of their life cycles, selection pressures favor parasites that can manipulate their vectors to enhance transmission. Strategies may include increasing the amount of contact between vector and host, reducing vector reproductive output and consequently altering vector resource management to increase available nutrient reserves, and increasing vector longevity. Manipulation of these life-history traits may be more beneficial at some phase of the parasite's developmental process than at others. This review examines empirical, experimental, and field-based evidence to evaluate examples of changes in vector behavior and physiology that might be construed to be manipulative. Examples are mainly drawn from malaria-infected mosquitoes, Leishmania-infected sandflies, and Trypanosoma-infected tsetse flies.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, increases the frequency of multiple feeding of its mosquito vector, Anopheles gambiae.

              It has often been suggested that vector-borne parasites alter their vector's feeding behaviour to increase their transmission, but these claims are often based on laboratory studies and lack rigorous testing in a natural situation. We show in this field study that the malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, alters the blood-feeding behaviour of its mosquito vector, Anopheles gambiae s.l., in two ways. First, mosquitoes infected with sporozoited, the parasite stage that is transmitted from the mosquito to a human, took up larger blood meals than uninfected mosquitoes. Whereas 72% of the uninfected mosquitoes had obtained a full blood meal, 82% of the infected ones had engorged fully. Second, mosquitoes harbouring sporozoites were more likely to bite several people per night. Twenty-two per cent of the infected mosquitoes, but only 10% of the uninfected mosquitoes, contained blood from at least two people. We conclude that the observed changes in blood-feeding behaviour allow the parasite to spread more rapidly among human hosts, and thus confirm that the parasite manipulates the mosquito to increase its own transmission.

                Author and article information

                Role: Editor
                PLoS Pathog
                PLoS Pathogens
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                July 2006
                28 July 2006
                : 2
                : 7
                Scripps Research Institute, United States
                Author notes
                * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thierry.lefevre@ 123456mpl.ird.fr

                Thierry Lefèvre, François Renaud, David G. Biron, and Frédéric Thomas are at Laboratory Génétique et Evolution des Maladies Infectieuses, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France. Jacob C. Koella is at the Division of Biology, Imperial College of London, Ascot, United Kingdom. Hilary Hurd is at the Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.

                06-PLPA-OP-0185 plpa-02-07-08
                Copyright: © 2006 Lefèvre et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                Page count
                Pages: 3
                Animal Behavior
                Infectious Diseases
                Custom metadata
                Lefèvre T, Koella JC, Renaud F, Hurd H, Biron DG, et al. (2006) New prospects for research on manipulation of insect vectors by pathogens. PLoS Pathog 2(7): e72. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020072

                Infectious disease & Microbiology


                Comment on this article