9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Visible, Elected, but Effectively Nominal: Visibility as a Barrier Maintaining the Political Underrepresentation of Britain’s Immigrant Origin Communities

      1
      Parliamentary Affairs
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ethnic minority groups have been and remain underrepresented in the British political system. However, we know little about how white immigrant origin groups—who share outgroup status based on non-native history, but differ to ethnic minority groups in terms of not having minority status—compare. Further, contemporary representational study also must concern itself with the quality, not just presence, of representation provided. This research therefore longitudinally compares the access to parliamentary roles for ethnic minority, white immigrant, and white British MPs. It finds that visibility of non-native status holds back descriptive representation—based on both appearance and non-British sounding names.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rethinking Representation

              Along with the traditional “promissory” form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here “anticipatory,” “gyroscopic,” and “surrogate” representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Parliamentary Affairs
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                0031-2290
                1460-2482
                July 2019
                July 01 2019
                June 01 2018
                July 2019
                July 01 2019
                June 01 2018
                : 72
                : 3
                : 542-560
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Politics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
                Article
                10.1093/pa/gsy022
                a8ae965e-572e-498f-82d7-1ae554522914
                © 2018

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article