4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Associations between first-time expectant women's representations of attachment and their physiological reactivity to infant cry.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Associations among 53 primiparous women's Adult Attachment Interview classifications (secure-autonomous vs. insecure-dismissing) and physiological and self-reported responses to infant crying were explored. Heart rate, skin conductance levels, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) were recorded continuously. In response to the cry, secure-autonomous women demonstrated RSA declines, consistent with approach-oriented responses. Insecure-dismissing women displayed RSA and electrodermal increases, consistent with behavioral inhibition. Furthermore, insecure-dismissing women rated the cries as more aversive than secure-autonomous women. Nine months postpartum, secure-autonomous women, who prenatally manifested an approach-oriented response to the unfamiliar cry stimulus, were observed as more sensitive when responding to their own distressed infant, whereas women classified prenatally as insecure-dismissing were observed as less sensitive with their own infants.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Child Dev
          Child development
          1467-8624
          0009-3920
          : 84
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, OR 97403-1227, USA. jcablow@uoregon.edu
          Article
          10.1111/cdev.12135
          23786152
          a8b9b59b-bffc-4ec9-8558-9881128fe404
          © 2013 The Authors. Child Development © 2013 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article