30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Successful knowledge translation intervention in long-term care: final results from the vitamin D and osteoporosis study (ViD OS) pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Few studies have systematically examined whether knowledge translation (KT) strategies can be successfully implemented within the long-term care (LTC) setting. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary KT intervention for improving the prescribing of vitamin D, calcium and osteoporosis medications over 12-months.

          Methods

          We conducted a pilot, cluster randomized controlled trial in 40 LTC homes (21 control; 19 intervention) in Ontario, Canada. LTC homes were eligible if they had more than one prescribing physician and received services from a large pharmacy provider. Participants were interdisciplinary care teams (physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, and other staff) who met quarterly. Intervention homes participated in three educational meetings over 12 months, including a standardized presentation led by expert opinion leaders, action planning for quality improvement, and audit and feedback review. Control homes did not receive any additional intervention. Resident-level prescribing and clinical outcomes were collected from the pharmacy database; data collectors and analysts were blinded. In addition to feasibility measures, study outcomes were the proportion of residents taking vitamin D (≥800 IU/daily; primary), calcium ≥500 mg/day and osteoporosis medications (high-risk residents) over 12 months. Data were analyzed using the generalized estimating equations technique accounting for clustering within the LTC homes.

          Results

          At baseline, 5,478 residents, mean age 84.4 (standard deviation (SD) 10.9), 71% female, resided in 40 LTC homes, mean size = 137 beds (SD 76.7). In the intention-to-treat analysis (21 control; 19 intervention clusters), the intervention resulted in a significantly greater increase in prescribing from baseline to 12 months between intervention versus control arms for vitamin D (odds ratio (OR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12, 2.96) and calcium (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.74), but not for osteoporosis medications (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.51). In secondary analyses, excluding seven nonparticipating intervention homes, ORs were 3.06 (95% CI: 2.18, 4.29), 1.57 (95% CI: 1.12, 2.21), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.60) for vitamin D, calcium and osteoporosis medications, respectively.

          Conclusions

          Our KT intervention significantly improved the prescribing of vitamin D and calcium and is a model that could potentially be applied to other areas requiring quality improvement.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01398527. Registered: 19 July 2011.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?

          There is confusion and misunderstanding about the concepts of knowledge translation, knowledge transfer, knowledge exchange, research utilization, implementation, diffusion, and dissemination. We review the terms and definitions used to describe the concept of moving knowledge into action. We also offer a conceptual framework for thinking about the process and integrate the roles of knowledge creation and knowledge application. The implications of knowledge translation for continuing education in the health professions include the need to base continuing education on the best available knowledge, the use of educational and other transfer strategies that are known to be effective, and the value of learning about planned-action theories to be better able to understand and influence change in practice settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how

            Pilot studies for phase III trials - which are comparative randomized trials designed to provide preliminary evidence on the clinical efficacy of a drug or intervention - are routinely performed in many clinical areas. Also commonly know as "feasibility" or "vanguard" studies, they are designed to assess the safety of treatment or interventions; to assess recruitment potential; to assess the feasibility of international collaboration or coordination for multicentre trials; to increase clinical experience with the study medication or intervention for the phase III trials. They are the best way to assess feasibility of a large, expensive full-scale study, and in fact are an almost essential pre-requisite. Conducting a pilot prior to the main study can enhance the likelihood of success of the main study and potentially help to avoid doomed main studies. The objective of this paper is to provide a detailed examination of the key aspects of pilot studies for phase III trials including: 1) the general reasons for conducting a pilot study; 2) the relationships between pilot studies, proof-of-concept studies, and adaptive designs; 3) the challenges of and misconceptions about pilot studies; 4) the criteria for evaluating the success of a pilot study; 5) frequently asked questions about pilot studies; 7) some ethical aspects related to pilot studies; and 8) some suggestions on how to report the results of pilot investigations using the CONSORT format.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges

              Background The PARiHS framework (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) has proved to be a useful practical and conceptual heuristic for many researchers and practitioners in framing their research or knowledge translation endeavours. However, as a conceptual framework it still remains untested and therefore its contribution to the overall development and testing of theory in the field of implementation science is largely unquantified. Discussion This being the case, the paper provides an integrated summary of our conceptual and theoretical thinking so far and introduces a typology (derived from social policy analysis) used to distinguish between the terms conceptual framework, theory and model – important definitional and conceptual issues in trying to refine theoretical and methodological approaches to knowledge translation. Secondly, the paper describes the next phase of our work, in particular concentrating on the conceptual thinking and mapping that has led to the generation of the hypothesis that the PARiHS framework is best utilised as a two-stage process: as a preliminary (diagnostic and evaluative) measure of the elements and sub-elements of evidence (E) and context (C), and then using the aggregated data from these measures to determine the most appropriate facilitation method. The exact nature of the intervention is thus determined by the specific actors in the specific context at a specific time and place. In the process of refining this next phase of our work, we have had to consider the wider issues around the use of theories to inform and shape our research activity; the ongoing challenges of developing robust and sensitive measures; facilitation as an intervention for getting research into practice; and finally to note how the current debates around evidence into practice are adopting wider notions that fit innovations more generally. Summary The paper concludes by suggesting that the future direction of the work on the PARiHS framework is to develop a two-stage diagnostic and evaluative approach, where the intervention is shaped and moulded by the information gathered about the specific situation and from participating stakeholders. In order to expedite the generation of new evidence and testing of emerging theories, we suggest the formation of an international research implementation science collaborative that can systematically collect and analyse experiences of using and testing the PARiHS framework and similar conceptual and theoretical approaches. We also recommend further refinement of the definitions around conceptual framework, theory, and model, suggesting a wider discussion that embraces multiple epistemological and ontological perspectives.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kennedyc@hhsc.ca
                g.ioannidis@sympatico.ca
                thabanl@mcmaster.ca
                adachi@sympatico.ca
                marrs@mcmaster.ca
                lmgiangr@uwaterloo.ca
                suzanne.morin@mcgill.ca
                crilly@sjhc.london.on.ca
                josser@smh.toronto.on.ca
                lohfeld@mcmaster.ca
                pickardl@hhsc.ca
                dhm9@xplornet.com
                ecampbell49@quickclic.net
                jstroud@medicalpharmacies.com
                ldolovic@mcmaster.ca
                sawka@uhn.on.ca
                RJain@osteoporosis.ca
                nashl@mcmaster.ca
                papaioannou@hhsc.ca
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                12 May 2015
                12 May 2015
                2015
                : 16
                : 214
                Affiliations
                [ ]McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada
                [ ]University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 Canada
                [ ]McGill University, 845Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4 Canada
                [ ]Western University, Parkwood Hospital, 801 Commissioners Road East, London, ON N6C 5 J1 Canada
                [ ]University of Toronto, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1 W8 Canada
                [ ]Medical Pharmacies Group Limited, 590 Granite Crt, Pickering, ON L1W 3X6 Canada
                [ ]Osteoporosis Canada, Suite 301, 1090 Don Mills Road, Toronto, ON M3C 3R6 Canada
                [ ]Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS) Centre, St. Peter’s Hospital, Room 151, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, ON L8M 1 W9 Canada
                Article
                720
                10.1186/s13063-015-0720-3
                4431601
                25962885
                a927dfb3-ade9-44db-a5d3-2616bb56807c
                © Kennedy et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 July 2014
                : 13 April 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                fracture,long-term care,vitamin d,prescribing,knowledge translation
                Medicine
                fracture, long-term care, vitamin d, prescribing, knowledge translation

                Comments

                Comment on this article