50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      When Pinocchio's nose does not grow: belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Does the brain activity underlying the production of deception differ depending on whether or not one believes their deception can be detected? To address this question, we had participants commit a mock theft in a laboratory setting, and then interrogated them while they underwent functional MRI (fMRI) scanning. Crucially, during some parts of the interrogation participants believed a lie-detector was activated, whereas in other parts they were told it was switched-off. We were thus able to examine the neural activity associated with the contrast between producing true vs. false claims, as well as the independent contrast between believing that deception could and could not be detected. We found increased activation in the right amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), as well as the left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), during the production of false (compared to true) claims. Importantly, there was a significant interaction between the effects of deception and belief in the left temporal pole and right hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus, where activity increased during the production of deception when participants believed their false claims could be detected, but not when they believed the lie-detector was switched-off. As these regions are associated with binding socially complex perceptual input and memory retrieval, we conclude that producing deceptive behavior in a context in which one believes this deception can be detected is associated with a cognitively taxing effort to reconcile contradictions between one's actions and recollections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest.

          In this study, we have assessed the validity and reliability of an automated labeling system that we have developed for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on magnetic resonance images into gyral based regions of interest (ROIs). Using a dataset of 40 MRI scans we manually identified 34 cortical ROIs in each of the individual hemispheres. This information was then encoded in the form of an atlas that was utilized to automatically label ROIs. To examine the validity, as well as the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the automated system, we used both intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and a new method known as mean distance maps, to assess the degree of mismatch between the manual and the automated sets of ROIs. When compared with the manual ROIs, the automated ROIs were highly accurate, with an average ICC of 0.835 across all of the ROIs, and a mean distance error of less than 1 mm. Intra- and inter-rater comparisons yielded little to no difference between the sets of ROIs. These findings suggest that the automated method we have developed for subdividing the human cerebral cortex into standard gyral-based neuroanatomical regions is both anatomically valid and reliable. This method may be useful for both morphometric and functional studies of the cerebral cortex as well as for clinical investigations aimed at tracking the evolution of disease-induced changes over time, including clinical trials in which MRI-based measures are used to examine response to treatment.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory.

            Finding one's way around an environment and remembering the events that occur within it are crucial cognitive abilities that have been linked to the hippocampus and medial temporal lobes. Our review of neuropsychological, behavioral, and neuroimaging studies of human hippocampal involvement in spatial memory concentrates on three important concepts in this field: spatial frameworks, dimensionality, and orientation and self-motion. We also compare variation in hippocampal structure and function across and within species. We discuss how its spatial role relates to its accepted role in episodic memory. Five related studies use virtual reality to examine these two types of memory in ecologically valid situations. While processing of spatial scenes involves the parahippocampus, the right hippocampus appears particularly involved in memory for locations within an environment, with the left hippocampus more involved in context-dependent episodic or autobiographical memory.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Book review

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front Hum Neurosci
                Front. Hum. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-5161
                04 February 2013
                2013
                : 7
                : 16
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus, Denmark
                [2] 2Department of Aesthetics and Communication - Linguistics, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, Rutgers University - Newark NJ, USA
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK
                [5] 5Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London London, UK
                [6] 6Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London London, UK
                [7] 7Department of Psychology, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research Peking University Beijing, China
                [8] 8Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, A Medical University Stockholm, Sweden
                Author notes

                Edited by: Matthias Gamer, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

                Reviewed by: Thomas Baumgartner, University of Basel, Switzerland; Nobuhito Abe, Kyoto University, Japan

                *Correspondence: Kamila E. Sip, Social and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology, Rutgers University - Newark, Smith Hall, Room 301, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07102, USA. e-mail: ksip@ 123456psychology.rutgers.edu
                Article
                10.3389/fnhum.2013.00016
                3563087
                23382715
                a98804d7-3d5a-47ed-b3c6-c1c0fae3bbbd
                Copyright © 2013 Sip, Carmel, Marchant, Li, Petrovic, Roepstorff, McGregor and Frith.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 28 August 2012
                : 14 January 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 58, Pages: 11, Words: 9118
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research Article

                Neurosciences
                mock-crime,deception,beliefs,lie-detection,fmri
                Neurosciences
                mock-crime, deception, beliefs, lie-detection, fmri

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log