10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis (TS-CL), the Cervical Answer to PI-LL, Defines Cervical Sagittal Deformity in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Osteotomy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cervical kyphosis and C2-C7 plumb line (CPL) are established descriptors of cervical sagittal deformity (CSD). Reciprocal changes in these parameters have been demonstrated in thoracolumbar deformity correction. The purpose of this study was to investigate the development of CSD, using T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL) to define CSD and to correlate TS-CL and a novel global sagittal parameter, cervical-thoracic pelvic angle (CTPA), with CPL.

          Methods

          A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with thoracolumbar deformity undergoing three-column osteotomy was performed. Preoperative and postoperative cervical parameters were investigated. Linear regression for postoperative values resulted in a CPL of 4 cm corresponding to a TS-CL threshold of 17°. Patients were classified based on postoperative TS-CL into uncompensated (TS-CL > 17°) or compensated cohorts (TS-CL < 17°); the two were compared using an unpaired t test. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine predictors of postoperative CSD.

          Results

          A total of 223 patients with thoracolumbar deformity (mean age, 57.56 years) were identified. CTPA correlated with CPL (preoperative r = .85, postoperative r = .69). TS-CL correlated with CTPA (preoperative r = .52, postoperative r = .37) and CPL (preoperative r = .52; postoperative r = .37). CSD had greater preoperative CPL ( P < .001) and CTPA ( P < .001). The compensated cohort had a decrease in TS-CL (from 10.2 to 8.0) with sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction, whereas the uncompensated had an increase in TS-CL (from 22.3 to 26.8) with all P < .001. Reciprocal change was demonstrated in the compensated group given that CL decreased with SVA correction ( r = .39), but there was no such correlation in the uncompensated. Positive predictors of postoperative CSD included baseline TS-CL > 17° ( P = .007), longer fusion ( P = .033), and baseline CTPA ( P = .029).

          Conclusions

          TS-CL and CTPA correlated significantly with established sagittal balance measures. Whereas reciprocal change in cervical and thoracolumbar alignment was demonstrated in the compensated cohort, the uncompensated population had progression of their cervical deformities after three-column osteotomy.

          Clinical Relevance

          The balance between TS-CL mirrors the relationship between pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis in defining deformities of their respective spinal regions.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Spine Surg
          ijss
          Int J Spine Surg
          International Journal of Spine Surgery
          International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
          2211-4599
          15 August 2018
          June 2018
          : 12
          : 3
          : 362-370
          Affiliations
          [1 ]New York University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, New York
          [2 ]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
          [3 ]Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Spine Surgery, Institut Universitaire de l'appareil Locomoteur et du Sport, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Centre Hospitalier Universaire de Nice, Nice, France
          [4 ]University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Charlottesville, Virginia
          [5 ]University of California Davis, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sacramento, California
          [6 ]San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, California
          [7 ]Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, New York
          [8 ]Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
          [9 ]University of Oregon Health Sciences Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Portland, Oregon
          [10 ]Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Presbyterian/St Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
          [11 ]University of California San Francisco, Department of Neurosurgery, San Francisco, California
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Themistocles Protopsaltis, MD, New York University Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003. Phone: (646) 501-7200; Fax: (212) 598-7654.
          Article
          PMC6159736 PMC6159736 6159736 ijss-12-03-04
          10.14444/5042
          6159736
          30276093
          a995dd7b-29df-426c-9332-2211510b2006
          ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2018
          History
          Categories
          Cervical Spine

          CPL,cervical kyphosis,thoracolumbar deformity,alignment,TS-CL

          Comments

          Comment on this article