10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      On the relative motions of long-lived Pacific mantle plumes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mantle plumes upwelling beneath moving tectonic plates generate age-progressive chains of volcanos (hotspot chains) used to reconstruct plate motion. However, these hotspots appear to move relative to each other, implying that plumes are not laterally fixed. The lack of age constraints on long-lived, coeval hotspot chains hinders attempts to reconstruct plate motion and quantify relative plume motions. Here we provide 40Ar/ 39Ar ages for a newly identified long-lived mantle plume, which formed the Rurutu hotspot chain. By comparing the inter-hotspot distances between three Pacific hotspots, we show that Hawaii is unique in its strong, rapid southward motion from 60 to 50 Myrs ago, consistent with paleomagnetic observations. Conversely, the Rurutu and Louisville chains show little motion. Current geodynamic plume motion models can reproduce the first-order motions for these plumes, but only when each plume is rooted in the lowermost mantle.

          Abstract

          Using mantle plumes to reconstruct past plate motion is complicated, because plumes may not be fixed. Here, the authors demonstrate using 40Ar/ 39Ar ages that the Rurutu plume is relatively stable compared to the rapidly moving Hawaiian plume, yet it has a similar deep mantle origin.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mantle plumes from ancient oceanic crust

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Synchronizing rock clocks of Earth history.

            Calibration of the geological time scale is achieved by independent radioisotopic and astronomical dating, but these techniques yield discrepancies of approximately 1.0% or more, limiting our ability to reconstruct Earth history. To overcome this fundamental setback, we compared astronomical and 40Ar/39Ar ages of tephras in marine deposits in Morocco to calibrate the age of Fish Canyon sanidine, the most widely used standard in 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. This calibration results in a more precise older age of 28.201 +/- 0.046 million years ago (Ma) and reduces the 40Ar/39Ar method's absolute uncertainty from approximately 2.5 to 0.25%. In addition, this calibration provides tight constraints for the astronomical tuning of pre-Neogene successions, resulting in a mutually consistent age of approximately 65.95 Ma for the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Three distinct types of hotspots in the Earth’s mantle

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Konradke@oregonstate.edu
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                27 February 2018
                27 February 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 854
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 1969, GRID grid.4391.f, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, , Oregon State University, ; Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9195 2461, GRID grid.23731.34, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, ; 14473 Potsdam, Germany
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, GRID grid.5510.1, Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), , University of Oslo, ; 0315 Oslo, Norway
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2188 0957, GRID grid.410445.0, Department of Geology and Geophysics, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, , University of Hawaii Manoa, ; Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9676, GRID grid.133342.4, Department of Earth Science, , UC Santa Barbara, ; Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3643-3049
                Article
                3277
                10.1038/s41467-018-03277-x
                5829163
                29487287
                a9cb10db-e178-4942-bbd8-c3a9fdd498a1
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 July 2017
                : 1 February 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article