2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Control Effects of Chelonus munakatae Against Chilo suppressalis and Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Paddy Fields

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Field and pot experiments were conducted to investigate the control effects of parasitoid wasps ( Chelonus munakatae Munakata) on striped rice stem borers and their impacts on N 2O and CH 4 emissions from paddy fields. Three treatments including no insect (NI), striped stem borer (CS) and parasitoid wasp + striped stem borer (CS+CM) were implemented. The abundance of GHG-related microorganisms in soils was determined by absolute real-time qPCR. Compared with NI, CS and CS+CM significantly increased the ratio of dead tillers, inhibited the growth and vitality of rice roots, and decreased the rice grain yield, while they significantly reduced the seasonal cumulative emissions of N 2O and CH 4 by 17.7–24.6 and 13.6–35.1%, and decreased the total seasonal global warming potential (GWP) by 13.6–34.7%, respectively. Moreover, compared with CS, CS+CM significantly enhanced the growth and vitality of rice roots, decreased the ratio of dead tillers, improved the rice grain yield, as well as increased the seasonal cumulative CH 4 emissions and the total seasonal GWP. Principal component analysis indicated that the morphological features of rice roots play a more important role in regulating GHG emissions than GHG-related microorganisms. The results suggested that C. munakatae can effectively control the outbreak of C. suppressalis and alleviate crop damage with acceptably higher GHG emissions. It is concluded that it can be recommended as an effective, environment-friendly and sustainable approach to prevent and control C. suppressalis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO).

              R Conrad (1996)
              Production and consumption processes in soils contribute to the global cycles of many trace gases (CH4, CO, OCS, H2, N2O, and NO) that are relevant for atmospheric chemistry and climate. Soil microbial processes contribute substantially to the budgets of atmospheric trace gases. The flux of trace gases between soil and atmosphere is usually the result of simultaneously operating production and consumption processes in soil: The relevant processes are not yet proven with absolute certainty, but the following are likely for trace gas consumption: H2 oxidation by abiontic soil enzymes; CO cooxidation by the ammonium monooxygenase of nitrifying bacteria; CH4 oxidation by unknown methanotrophic bacteria that utilize CH4 for growth; OCS hydrolysis by bacteria containing carbonic anhydrase; N2O reduction to N2 by denitrifying bacteria; NO consumption by either reduction to N2O in denitrifiers or oxidation to nitrate in heterotrophic bacteria. Wetland soils, in contrast to upland soils are generally anoxic and thus support the production of trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, N2O, and NO) by anaerobic bacteria such as fermenters, methanogens, acetogens, sulfate reducers, and denitrifiers. Methane is the dominant gaseous product of anaerobic degradation of organic matter and is released into the atmosphere, whereas the other trace gases are only intermediates, which are mostly cycled within the anoxic habitat. A significant percentage of the produced methane is oxidized by methanotrophic bacteria at anoxic-oxic interfaces such as the soil surface and the root surface of aquatic plants that serve as conduits for O2 transport into and CH4 transport out of the wetland soils. The dominant production processes in upland soils are different from those in wetland soils and include H2 production by biological N2 fixation, CO production by chemical decomposition of soil organic matter, and NO and N2O production by nitrification and denitrification. The processes responsible for CH4 production in upland soils are completely unclear, as are the OCS production processes in general. A problem for future research is the attribution of trace gas metabolic processes not only to functional groups of microorganisms but also to particular taxa. Thus, it is completely unclear how important microbial diversity is for the control of trace gas flux at the ecosystem level. However, different microbial communities may be part of the reason for differences in trace gas metabolism, e.g., effects of nitrogen fertilizers on CH4 uptake by soil; decrease of CH4 production with decreasing temperature; or different rates and modes of NO and N2O production in different soils and under different conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                06 March 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 228
                Affiliations
                [1] 1MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University , Wuhan, China
                [2] 2Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Industry, Yangtze University , Jingzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Victoria Fernandez, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain

                Reviewed by: Gong-yin Ye, Zhejiang University, China; Yu Jiang, Nanjing Agricultural University, China

                *Correspondence: Chengfang Li, lichengfang@ 123456126.com

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2020.00228
                7067967
                a9d0b229-5b85-4b18-8689-6f4753ca060c
                Copyright © 2020 Fan, Zhang, Liu, Cao and Li.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 15 October 2019
                : 13 February 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 7, References: 47, Pages: 10, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research

                Plant science & Botany
                chilo suppressalis,chelonus munakatae,ch4,n2o,paddy field
                Plant science & Botany
                chilo suppressalis, chelonus munakatae, ch4, n2o, paddy field

                Comments

                Comment on this article