27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of two fracture toughness testing methods using a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia dental ceramic

      research-article
      , DDS, MSc, , DDS, MSc, , DDS, PhD
      The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
      The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
      Fracture toughness, Dental ceramics, Zirconia

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          The objective of this study was to compare the fracture toughness (K Ic) obtained from the single edge V-notched beam (SEVNB) and the fractographic analysis (FTA) of a glass-infiltrated and a zirconia ceramic.

          MATERIALS AND METHODS

          For each material, ten bar-shaped specimens were prepared for the SEVNB method (3 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm) and the FTA method (2 mm × 4 mm × 25 mm). The starter V-notch was prepared as the fracture initiating flaw for the SEVNB method. A Vickers indentation load of 49 N was used to create a controlled surface flaw on each FTA specimen. All specimens were loaded to fracture using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5-1 mm/min. The independent-samples t-test was used for the statistical analysis of the K Ic values at α=0.05.

          RESULTS

          The mean K Ic of zirconia ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (5.4 ± 1.6 MPa·m 1/2) was comparable to that obtained from FTA method (6.3 ± 1.6 MPa·m 1/2). The mean K Ic of glass-infiltrated ceramic obtained from SEVNB method (4.1 ± 0.6 MPa·m 1/2) was significantly lower than that obtained from FTA method (5.1 ± 0.7 MPa·m 1/2).

          CONCLUSION

          The mean K Ic of the glass-infiltrated and zirconia ceramics obtained from the SEVNB method were lower than those obtained from FTA method even they were not significantly different for the zirconia material. The differences in the K Ic values could be a result of the differences in the characteristics of fracture initiating flaws of these two methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review.

          Developments in ceramic core materials such as lithium disilicate, aluminum oxide, and zirconium oxide have allowed more widespread application of all-ceramic restorations over the past 10 years. With a plethora of ceramic materials and systems currently available for use, an overview of the scientific literature on the efficacy of this treatment therapy is indicated. This article reviews the current literature covering all-ceramic materials and systems, with respect to survival, material properties, marginal and internal fit, cementation and bonding, and color and esthetics, and provides clinical recommendations for their use. A comprehensive review of the literature was completed seeking evidence for the treatment of teeth with all-ceramic restorations. A search of English language peer-reviewed literature was undertaken using MEDLINE and PubMed with a focus on evidence-based research articles published between 1996 and 2006. A hand search of relevant dental journals was also completed. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled studies, longitudinal experimental clinical studies, longitudinal prospective studies, and longitudinal retrospective studies were reviewed. The last search was conducted on June 12, 2007. Data supporting the clinical application of all-ceramic materials and systems was sought. The literature demonstrates that multiple all-ceramic materials and systems are currently available for clinical use, and there is not a single universal material or system for all clinical situations. The successful application is dependent upon the clinician to match the materials, manufacturing techniques, and cementation or bonding procedures, with the individual clinical situation. Within the scope of this systematic review, there is no evidence to support the universal application of a single ceramic material and system for all clinical situations. Additional longitudinal clinical studies are required to advance the development of ceramic materials and systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial.

            Zirconia ceramics have several advantages over other ceramic materials, due to the transformation toughening mechanisms operating in their microstructure that can give to components made out of them, very interesting mechanical properties. The research on the use of zirconia ceramics as biomaterials started about twenty years ago, and now zirconia (Y-YZP) is in clinical use in THR, but developments are in progress for application in other medical devices. Recent developments have concentrated on the chemistry of precursors, in forming and sintering processes, and on surface finish of components. Today's main applications of zirconia ceramics is in THR ball heads. This review takes into account the main results achieved up to now, and is focused on the role that microstructural characteristics play on the TZP ceramics behaviour in ball heads, namely mechanical properties and their stability, wear of the UHMWPE paired to TZP, and their influence on biocompatibility.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling.

              Hertzian cone cracks visible at the loading site of 20 all-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPDs), tested in vitro, led to the hypotheses that failure was due to the propagation of localized contact damage crack systems (Hertzian stress state) and that such damage was an unlikely clinical failure mode. Fractographic analysis of the 20 laboratory-failed and nine clinically-failed all-ceramic FPDs allowed for definitive testing of these hypotheses and a comparison between in vitro and in vivo failure behavior. In all cases, failure occurred in the FPD connectors (none from contact damage), with approximately 70 to 78% originating from the interface between the core and veneer ceramics. The coincidence between failure origins provides strong evidence that the in vitro test modeled aspects of structural behavior having clinical importance. The fractographic observations, coupled with the in vitro failure load data, furnished very specific boundary conditions which were applied to constrain mathematical models of FPD connector failure. Finite element analysis (FEA) of the laboratory FPDs found that maximum principal tensile stresses would occur at locations consistent with the fractographic observations only if: (1) there were appropriate elastic moduli differences between the ceramics; and (2) a small amount of abutment rotation was allowed. Weibull failure probability (Pf) calculations, incorporating FEA stress profiles, very closely replicated the laboratory failure distribution only when: (1) the veneer ceramic was much weaker than the core ceramic; and (2) the Weibull modulus of the core-veneer interface was much lower than that for the free veneer surface (i.e., the interface is of lower quality with regard to defects).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Adv Prosthodont
                J Adv Prosthodont
                JAP
                The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
                The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
                2005-7806
                2005-7814
                February 2013
                28 February 2013
                : 5
                : 1
                : 36-43
                Affiliations
                Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Kallaya Suputtamongkol. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yothi Streeet, Prayathai, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. Tel. 6626448644 ext 6441: kallaya.sup@ 123456mahidol.ac.th
                Article
                10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.36
                3597924
                23507882
                a9e26ece-7aa2-428d-8884-f6f35d38dbe4
                © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 October 2012
                : 03 January 2013
                : 13 February 2013
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                dental ceramics,fracture toughness,zirconia
                Dentistry
                dental ceramics, fracture toughness, zirconia

                Comments

                Comment on this article