22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Factors affecting the recovery of soft-sediment mussel reefs in the Firth of Thames, New Zealand

      , , , ,
      Marine and Freshwater Research
      CSIRO Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bivalve reefs are vital ecosystem engineers but have declined or disappeared in many regions. In the Firth of Thames (FOT), north-east New Zealand, overfishing, sedimentation or both led to the virtual extinction of extensive reefs of green-lipped mussels (Perna canaliculus). The mussel reefs have not recovered since commercial fishing ceased in 1968, possibly because the muddy sediments that replaced the reefs are an unsuitable habitat for adult mussels. To test this hypothesis, we transplanted mussels into cages on the seafloor for 500 days at three sites along a turbidity gradient (average visibility 0.8–4.7 m) within the mussel reefs’ former range for 500 days. Results showed that 68% of individuals survived the experiment and grew an average of 19 mm in length. Survivorship and growth did not differ between sites. However, at the completion of the experiment, mussels from the least turbid site were in better condition (condition index = 15) than those from the most turbid site (condition index = 10). Our results suggest that the current lack of recovery of mussel reefs in the FOT is attributable to low recruitment and survivorship of juvenile mussels. Restoration of mussel reefs and the ecosystem services that they provide may therefore be possible.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Oyster Reefs at Risk and Recommendations for Conservation, Restoration, and Management

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: a century of habitat destruction and overfishing

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fishing down the coast: historical expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries along continental margins.

              Estuarine ecosystems have changed dramatically from centuries of fishing, habitat disturbance, sedimentation, and nutrient loading. Degradation of oyster reefs by destructive fishing practices in particular has had a profound effect on estuarine ecology, yet the timing and magnitude of oyster-reef degradation in estuaries is poorly quantified. Here, I evaluate the expansion and collapse of oyster fisheries in 28 estuaries along three continental margins through the analysis of historical proxies derived from fishery records to infer when oyster reefs were degraded. Exploitation for oysters did not occur randomly along continental margins but followed a predictable pattern. Oyster fisheries expanded and collapsed in a linear sequence along eastern North America (Crassostrea virginica), western North America (Ostreola conchaphila), and eastern Australia (Saccostrea glomerata). Fishery collapse began in the estuaries that were nearest to a developing urban center before exploitation began to spread down the coast. As each successive fishery collapsed, oysters from more distant estuaries were fished and transported to restock exploited estuaries near the original urban center. This moving wave of exploitation traveled along each coastline until the most distant estuary had been reached and overfished. Copyright 2004 The National Academy of Sciencs of the USA
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Marine and Freshwater Research
                Mar. Freshwater Res.
                CSIRO Publishing
                1323-1650
                2012
                2012
                : 63
                : 1
                : 78
                Article
                10.1071/MF11083
                aa1f6ea3-3efd-45af-bcd0-d18a57c61208
                © 2012
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article