139
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Problem formulation is the first step in environmental risk assessment (ERA) where policy goals, scope, assessment endpoints, and methodology are distilled to an explicitly stated problem and approach for analysis. The consistency and utility of ERAs for genetically modified (GM) plants can be improved through rigorous problem formulation (PF), producing an analysis plan that describes relevant exposure scenarios and the potential consequences of these scenarios. A properly executed PF assures the relevance of ERA outcomes for decision-making. Adopting a harmonized approach to problem formulation should bring about greater uniformity in the ERA process for GM plants among regulatory regimes globally. This paper is the product of an international expert group convened by the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Research Foundation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Uncertainty

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

            An international initiative is developing a scientifically rigorous approach to evaluate the potential risks to nontarget arthropods (NTAs) posed by insect-resistant, genetically modified (IRGM) crops. It adapts the tiered approach to risk assessment that is used internationally within regulatory toxicology and environmental sciences. The approach focuses on the formulation and testing of clearly stated risk hypotheses, making maximum use of available data and using formal decision guidelines to progress between testing stages (or tiers). It is intended to provide guidance to regulatory agencies that are currently developing their own NTA risk assessment guidelines for IRGM crops and to help harmonize regulatory requirements between different countries and different regions of the world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms.

              Representatives of the developers of modern agricultural biotechnology are proposing a tiered approach for conducting non-target organism risk assessment for genetically modified (GM) plants in Europe. The approach was developed by the Technical Advisory Group of the EuropaBio Plant Biotechnology Unit (http://www.europabio.org/TAG.htm) and complements other international activities to harmonize risk assessment. In the European Union (EU), the principles and methods to be followed in an environmental risk assessment for the placing on the market of GM plants are laid out in Annex II of Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of GMOs, Commission Decision 2002/623/EC and Regulation (EC) No. 1829/2003. Additional information is provided in the European Food Safety Authority guidance document of 2004. However, risk assessment for effects to non-target organisms could benefit from further clarification and remains the subject of much discussion in Europe. The industry-wide approach developed by EuropaBio is based on the fundamental steps of risk evaluation, namely hazard and exposure assessment. It follows a structured scheme including assessment planning, product characterization and assessment of hazard/exposure (Tier 0), single high dose and dose response testing (Tier 1), refined hazard characterization and exposure assessment (Tier 2) and further refined risk assessment experiments (Tier 3). An additional tier (Tier 4) was included to reflect the fact that post-market activities such as monitoring are required under Directive 2001/18/EC. The approach is compatible with conditions of commercial release in the EU and around the world.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jdwolt@iastate.edu
                Paul.Keese@health.gov.au
                alan.raybould@syngenta.com
                +1-202-6593306 , +1-202-6593617 , juliefitzpatrick@verizon.net
                mburac@minprod.gov.ar
                ajg@ceh.ac.uk
                solin@ilsi.org
                joachim.schiemann@jki.bund.de
                msears@uoguelph.ca
                few8@pitt.edu
                Journal
                Transgenic Res
                Transgenic Research
                Springer Netherlands (Dordrecht )
                0962-8819
                1573-9368
                15 September 2009
                15 September 2009
                June 2010
                : 19
                : 3
                : 425-436
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biosafety Institute for Genetically Modified Agricultural Products, Iowa State University, Ames, IA USA
                [2 ]Department of Health and Ageing, Biotechnology Regulatory Services, Office of Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra, ACT Australia
                [3 ]Syngenta, Berkshire, UK
                [4 ]ILSI Research Foundation, 1156 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 USA
                [5 ]Oficina de Biotecnología, Secretaría de Agricultura, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [6 ]Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Dorset, UK
                [7 ]Julius Kuehn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Quedlinburg, Germany
                [8 ]Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
                [9 ]Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
                Article
                9321
                10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9
                2865628
                19757133
                aa5ab883-a6d3-4ab4-bac6-b35b986e6bc5
                © The Author(s) 2009
                History
                : 3 March 2009
                : 28 August 2009
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

                Genetics
                ecological risk assessment,genetically engineered,gmo,hazard identification
                Genetics
                ecological risk assessment, genetically engineered, gmo, hazard identification

                Comments

                Comment on this article