11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of an Innovative Mobile Dentistry eHygiene Model Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in the National Dental Practice–Based Research Network: Protocol for Design, Implementation, and Usability Testing

      research-article
      , DDS, PhD 1 , , MS, DDS 1 , , BFA 1 , , BS 2 , , BA 2 , , DDS 1 , , DDS 1 , , PhD 3 , , MPH, MD 4 , , BSDH, RDH, PHDHP 5 , , MSDH, RDH 5 , , RDH 5 , , MPH, DDS 1 , , National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      JMIR Research Protocols
      JMIR Publications
      teledentistry, mDentistry, oral diseases, virtual visit, intraoral camera, pandemic response, COVID-19, mHealth

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Amid COVID-19, and other possible future infectious disease pandemics, dentistry needs to consider modified dental examination regimens that render quality care, are cost effective, and ensure the safety of patients and dental health care personnel (DHCP). Traditional dental examinations, which number more than 300 million per year in the United States, rely on person-to-person tactile examinations, pose challenges to infection control, and consume large quantities of advanced-level personal protective equipment (PPE). Therefore, our long-term goal is to develop an innovative mobile dentistry (mDent) model that takes these issues into account. This model supplements the traditional dental practice with virtual visits, supported by mobile devices such as mobile telephones, tablets, and wireless infrastructure. The mDent model leverages the advantages of digital mobile health (mHealth) tools such as intraoral cameras to deliver virtual oral examinations, treatment planning, and interactive oral health management, on a broad population basis. Conversion of the traditional dental examinations to mDent virtual examinations builds upon (1) the reliability of teledentistry, which uses intraoral photos and live videos to make diagnostic decisions, and (2) rapid advancement in mHealth tool utilization.

          Objective

          In this pilot project, we designed a 2-stage implementation study to assess 2 critical components of the mDent model: virtual hygiene examination (eHygiene) and patient self-taken intraoral photos (SELFIE). Our specific aims are to (1) assess the acceptance and barriers of mDent eHygiene among patients and DHCP, (2) assess the economic impact of mDent eHygiene, and (3) assess the patient’s capability to generate intraoral photos using mHealth tools (exploratory aim, SELFIE).

          Methods

          This study will access the rich resources of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to recruit 12 dentists, 12 hygienists, and 144 patients from 12 practices. For aims 1 and 2, we will use role-specific questionnaires to collect quantitative data on eHygiene acceptance and economic impact. The questionnaire components include participant characteristics, the System Usability Scale, a dentist-patient communication scale, practice operation cost, and patient opportunity cost. We will further conduct a series of iterative qualitative research activities using individual interviews to further elicit feedback and suggestion for changes to the mDent eHygiene model. For aim 3, we will use mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) to assess the patient’s capability of taking intraoral photos, by analyzing obtained photos and recorded videos.

          Results

          The study is supported by the US National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. This study received “single” institutional review board approval in August 2021. Data collection and analysis are expected to conclude by December 2021 and March 2022, respectively.

          Conclusions

          The study results will inform the logistics of conducting virtual dental examinations and empowering patients with mHealth tools, providing better safety and preserving PPE amid the COVID-19 and possible future pandemics.

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          PRR1-10.2196/32345

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determining Sample Size

          J M Morse (2000)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using teledentistry in clinical practice as an enabler to improve access to clinical care: A qualitative systematic review.

            Background Access to dental care is important for overall health, but can remain problematic for those in rural or isolated locations. It can be difficult to encourage clinicians to choose or continue a rural health career. Teledentistry is showing some promise as a strategy to support rural, isolated and new health care workers. This study aims to explore the quantitative and qualitative framework associated with teledentistry in an effort to uncover the interaction of multiple influences on its delivery and sustainability. Methods A systematic search of the literature was undertaken and studies were included if they evaluated consultative teledentistry, reports on implementation of teledentistry in practice or attitudes to teledentistry. Studies were evaluated qualitatively. Results Thirty-nine studies were included focusing on the accuracy, effectiveness or description a teledentistry project in practice. Five main themes were identified in the qualitative analysis: (1) using information and communication technology (ICT), (2) regulatory and system improvements, (3) accuracy of teledentistry, (4) effectiveness, including increasing access to clinical services, efficiencies and acceptability, and (5) building and increasing clinical capacity of the dental workforce. Conclusion Teledentistry provides a viable option for remote screening, diagnosis, consultation, treatment planning and mentoring in the field of dentistry. Rapidly developing information and communication technologies have increasingly shown improving cost effectiveness, accuracy and efficient remote assistance for clinicians. There is high acceptability for teledentistry amongst clinicians and patients alike. Remuneration of advising clinicians is critical to sustainability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Comparing the Usability and Acceptability of Wearable Sensors Among Older Irish Adults in a Real-World Context: Observational Study

              Background Wearable devices are valuable assessment tools for patient outcomes in contexts such as clinical trials. To be successfully deployed, however, participants must be willing to wear them. Another concern is that usability studies are rarely published, often fail to test devices beyond 24 hours, and need to be repeated frequently to ensure that contemporary devices are assessed. Objective This study aimed to compare multiple wearable sensors in a real-world context to establish their usability within an older adult (>50 years) population. Methods Eight older adults wore seven devices for a minimum of 1 week each: Actigraph GT9x, Actibelt, Actiwatch, Biovotion, Hexoskin, Mc10 Biostamp_RC, and Wavelet. Usability was established through mixed methods using semistructured interviews and three questionnaires, namely, the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), the System Usability Scale (SUS), and an acceptability questionnaire. Quantitative data were reported descriptively and qualitative data were analyzed using deductive content analysis. Data were then integrated using triangulation. Results Results demonstrated that no device was considered optimal as all scored below average in the SUS (median, IQR; min-max=57.5, 12.5; 47.5-63.8). Hexoskin was the lowest scored device based on the IMI (3.6; 3.4-4.5), while Biovotion, Actibelt, and Mc10 Biostamp_RC achieved the highest median results on the acceptability questionnaire (3.6 on a 6-point Likert scale). Qualitatively, participants were willing to accept less comfort, less device discretion, and high charging burdens if the devices were perceived as useful, namely through the provision of feedback for the user. Participants agreed that the purpose of use is a key enabler for long-term compliance. These views were particularly noted by those not currently wearing an activity-tracking device. Participants believed that wrist-worn sensors were the most versatile and easy to use, and therefore, the most suitable for long-term use. In particular, Actiwatch and Wavelet stood out for their comfort. The convergence of quantitative and qualitative data was demonstrated in the study. Conclusions Based on the results, the following context-specific recommendations can be made: (1) researchers should consider their device selection in relation to both individual and environmental factors, and not simply the primary outcome of the research study; (2) if researchers do not wish their participants to have access to feedback from the devices, then a simple, wrist-worn device that acts as a watch is preferable; (3) if feedback is allowed, then it should be made available to help participants remain engaged; this is likely to apply only to people without cognitive impairments; (4) battery life of 1 week should be considered as a necessary feature to enhance data capture; (5) researchers should consider providing additional information about the purpose of devices to participants to support their continued use.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                October 2021
                26 October 2021
                26 October 2021
                : 10
                : 10
                : e32345
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Eastman Institute for Oral Health University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY United States
                [2 ] Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Portland, OR United States
                [3 ] Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY United States
                [4 ] Department of Family Medicine University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY United States
                [5 ] Mouthwatch LLC Metuchen, NJ United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski Dorota_KopyckaKedzierawski@ 123456URMC.Rochester.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8776-2520
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-8081
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9272-9354
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6162-099X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-7573
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8302-0474
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5990-8123
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-9923
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-8012
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3482-6105
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-9997
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-9211
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-6805
                Article
                v10i10e32345
                10.2196/32345
                8549859
                34597259
                aa5dc817-6e70-4bf1-a66a-ac0bc255a5cb
                ©Jin Xiao, Cyril Meyerowitz, Patricia Ragusa, Kimberly Funkhouser, Tamara R Lischka, Luis Alberto Mendez Chagoya, Nisreen Al Jallad, Tong Tong Wu, Kevin Fiscella, Eden Ivie, Michelle Strange, Jamie Collins, Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski, National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 26.10.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 23 July 2021
                : 19 September 2021
                : 20 September 2021
                : 22 September 2021
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol

                teledentistry,mdentistry,oral diseases,virtual visit,intraoral camera,pandemic response,covid-19,mhealth

                Comments

                Comment on this article