Blog
About

180
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection.

      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

      Animals, Research Design, Reference Standards, genetics, analysis, RNA, Messenger, methods, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Models, Statistical, Mice, Humans, Gene Expression Profiling, DNA Probes, Artifacts

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent advances in cDNA and oligonucleotide DNA arrays have made it possible to measure the abundance of mRNA transcripts for many genes simultaneously. The analysis of such experiments is nontrivial because of large data size and many levels of variation introduced at different stages of the experiments. The analysis is further complicated by the large differences that may exist among different probes used to interrogate the same gene. However, an attractive feature of high-density oligonucleotide arrays such as those produced by photolithography and inkjet technology is the standardization of chip manufacturing and hybridization process. As a result, probe-specific biases, although significant, are highly reproducible and predictable, and their adverse effect can be reduced by proper modeling and analysis methods. Here, we propose a statistical model for the probe-level data, and develop model-based estimates for gene expression indexes. We also present model-based methods for identifying and handling cross-hybridizing probes and contaminating array regions. Applications of these results will be presented elsewhere.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          11134512
          10.1073/pnas.011404098
          14539

          Comments

          Comment on this article