7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and implementation of an end-of-shift clinical debriefing method for emergency departments during COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Multiple guidelines recommend debriefing after clinical events in the emergency department (ED) to improve performance, but their implementation has been limited. We aimed to start a clinical debriefing program to identify opportunities to address teamwork and patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Methods

          We reviewed existing literature on best-practice guidelines to answer key clinical debriefing program design questions. An end-of-shift huddle format for the debriefs allowed multiple cases of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 illness to be discussed in the same session, promoting situational awareness and team learning. A novel ED-based clinical debriefing tool was implemented and titled Debriefing In Situ COVID-19 to Encourage Reflection and Plus-Delta in Healthcare After Shifts End (DISCOVER-PHASE). A facilitator experienced in simulation debriefings would facilitate a short (10–25 min) discussion of the relevant cases by following a scripted series of stages for debriefing. Data on the number of debriefing opportunities, frequency of utilization of debriefing, debriefing location, and professional background of the facilitator were analyzed.

          Results

          During the study period, the ED treated 3386 suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases, with 11 deaths and 77 ICU admissions. Of the 187 debriefing opportunities in the first 8-week period, 163 (87.2%) were performed. Of the 24 debriefings not performed, 21 (87.5%) of these were during the four first weeks (21/24; 87.5%). Clinical debriefings had a median duration of 10 min (IQR 7–13). They were mostly facilitated by a nurse (85.9%) and mainly performed remotely (89.8%).

          Conclusion

          Debriefing with DISCOVER-PHASE during the COVID-19 pandemic were performed often, were relatively brief, and were most often led remotely by a nurse facilitator. Future research should describe the clinical and organizational impact of this DISCOVER-PHASE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

          Key Points Question What factors are associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers in China who are treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in multiple regions of China, a considerable proportion of health care workers reported experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress, especially women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers directly engaged in diagnosing, treating, or providing nursing care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Meaning These findings suggest that, among Chinese health care workers exposed to COVID-19, women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers have a high risk of developing unfavorable mental health outcomes and may need psychological support or interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry.

            Drawing on theory and empirical findings from a 35-year research program in the behavioral sciences on how to improve professional effectiveness through reflective practice, we develop a model of "debriefing with good judgment." The model specifies a rigorous reflection process that helps trainees surface and resolve pressing clinical and behavioral dilemmas raised by the simulation. Based on the authors' own experience using this approach in approximately 2000 debriefings, it was found that the "debriefing with good judgment" approach often sparks self-reflection and behavior change in trainees.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing.

              We describe an integrated conceptual framework for a blended approach to debriefing called PEARLS [Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation]. We provide a rationale for scripted debriefing and introduce a PEARLS debriefing tool designed to facilitate implementation of the new framework. The PEARLS framework integrates 3 common educational strategies used during debriefing, namely, (1) learner self-assessment, (2) facilitating focused discussion, and (3) providing information in the form of directive feedback and/or teaching. The PEARLS debriefing tool incorporates scripted language to guide the debriefing, depending on the strategy chosen. The PEARLS framework and debriefing script fill a need for many health care educators learning to facilitate debriefings in simulation-based education. The PEARLS offers a structured framework adaptable for debriefing simulations with a variety in goals, including clinical decision making, improving technical skills, teamwork training, and interprofessional collaboration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jcservotte5@gmail.com
                Thomas.Welch-Horan@bcm.edu
                mullan20@gmail.com
                j.piazza@chuliege.be
                a.ghuysen@uliege.be
                dszyld@bwh.harvard.edu
                Journal
                Adv Simul (Lond)
                Adv Simul (Lond)
                Advances in Simulation
                BioMed Central (London )
                2059-0628
                11 November 2020
                11 November 2020
                2020
                : 5
                : 32
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4861.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0805 7253, Public Health Sciences Department, , University of Liege, ; Liege, Belgium
                [2 ]GRID grid.4861.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0805 7253, Interdisciplinary Medical Simulation Center of Liege, , University of Liege, ; Liege, Belgium
                [3 ]GRID grid.416975.8, ISNI 0000 0001 2200 2638, Director of Simulation, Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, , Texas Children’s Hospital, ; Houston, TX USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.255414.3, ISNI 0000 0001 2182 3733, Director of Research and Quality Improvement, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters, , Eastern Virginia Medical School, ; Norfolk, VA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.411374.4, ISNI 0000 0000 8607 6858, Emergency Department, , University Hospital Centre of Liege, ; Liege, Belgium
                [6 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Senior Director, Institute for Medical Simulation, Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-3822
                Article
                150
                10.1186/s41077-020-00150-0
                7656224
                33292850
                aa935ac8-36ad-484a-b59f-2b0cfa3aeb83
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 5 August 2020
                : 22 October 2020
                Categories
                Innovation
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                clinical event debriefing,implementation,covid-19,communication,safety,quality

                Comments

                Comment on this article