13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      CALGB (Alliance) 40603: Long-term outcomes (LTOs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) +/- carboplatin (Cb) and bevacizumab (Bev) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          591

          Background: Both Cb and Bev demonstrate activity when combined with standard chemotherapy in TNBC. CALGB 40603 is a 2x2 randomized trial that previously demonstrated that adding Cb to NACT significantly increased pathologic complete responses in the breast/axilla (pCR), while adding Bev did not (Sikov, JCO 2015). Here we report 5-year LTOs and assess factors that influenced them. Methods: 443 patients with clinical stage II-III previously untreated TNBC received 12 weeks of paclitaxel (wP) +/- Cb then dose-dense AC, +/- Bev before surgery. The primary endpoint was pCR. Analyses of LTOs (event-free survival (EFS), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS)), impact of residual cancer burden and other variables were secondary. Results: Median follow-up was 5.7 years (y); 5y EFS was 70.9% (95% CI; 66.7%-75.4%), DRFI 76.3% (72.3%-80.5%) and OS 76.9% (72.9%-81.2%). Pretreatment clinical stage and achieving pCR correlated with LTOs, while age, race, subtype (basal-like vs. not) and tumor grade did not. Among pCR 5y EFS was 86.4% vs. 57.5% for non-pCR (HR 0.28, 0.19-0.43), OS was 88.7% vs 66.5% (HR = 0.28, 0.17-0.44). This relationship was similar in all trial arms. Any residual disease conferred poorer outcome; compared with pCR/Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) 0, EFS HRs were 2.29 (1.32-3.97), 3.01 (1.90-4.74), and 9.67 (5.66-16.51) for RCBI, II and III, respectively. There were no improvements in LTOs with Cb (EFS HR 0.99, 0.70-1.40) or Bev (EFS HR 0.91, 0.64-1.29). In an exploratory analysis, receipt of ≥11 doses of wP was associated with better EFS (HR 1.92, 1.33-2.77); this was particularly notable in Cb-treated arms. Conclusions: As expected, regardless of treatment arm pCR was associated with markedly better LTOs, and pts with any residual disease had significantly worse outcomes. The addition of Cb or Bev to standard NACT for TNBC did not improve LTOs in this trial, although it should be noted that the trial was not powered for this endpoint. Omission of chemotherapy doses may result in poorer outcomes, especially among Cb-treated pts, which may warrant further evaluation. Support: U10CA180821; U10CA180882; Genentech; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; NCT00861705 Clinical trial information: NCT00861705.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Clinical Oncology
          JCO
          American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
          0732-183X
          1527-7755
          May 20 2019
          May 20 2019
          : 37
          : 15_suppl
          : 591
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI;
          [2 ]Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;
          [3 ]Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;
          [4 ]The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC;
          [5 ]New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY;
          [6 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
          [7 ]Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
          [8 ]City of Hope, Duarte, CA;
          [9 ]Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY;
          [10 ]Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO;
          [11 ]First Health of the Carolinas Cancer Ctr, Pinehurst, NC;
          [12 ]NSABP, and The Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL;
          [13 ]Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;
          [14 ]Patient Advocates Rsch, Danville, CA;
          [15 ]University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL;
          [16 ]American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA;
          [17 ]University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC;
          Article
          10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.591
          aac36f18-3d5f-4819-a9f4-2d2933004d5f
          © 2019
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article