13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research.

      Health Services Research
      Bias (Epidemiology), Confidence Intervals, Data Collection, methods, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Hospitals, Urban, organization & administration, Humans, Internship and Residency, Job Description, Medical Staff, Hospital, Reproducibility of Results, Sampling Studies, Time and Motion Studies, United States, Work

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study compares results and illustrates trade-offs between work-sampling and time-and-motion methodologies. Data are from time-and-motion measurements of a sample of medical residents in two large urban hospitals. The study contrasts the precision of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques using data actually collected using the time-and-motion approach. That data set was used to generate a simulated set of work-sampling data points. Trained observers followed residents during their 24-hour day and recorded the start and end time of each activity performed by the resident. The activities were coded and then grouped into ten major categories. Work-sampling data were derived from the raw time-and-motion data for hourly, half-hourly, and quarter-hourly observations. The actual time spent on different tasks as assessed by the time-and-motion analysis differed from the percent of time projected by work-sampling. The work-sampling results differed by 20 percent or more of the estimated value for eight of the ten activities. As expected, the standard deviation decreases as work-sampling observations become more frequent. Findings indicate that the work-sampling approach, as commonly employed, may not provide an acceptably precise approximation of the result that would be obtained by time-and-motion observations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article