20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders : Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders

      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 1 , 1 , 16 , 2 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 21 , 22 , 12 , 23 , 24 , 2 , 3 , 25 , 16 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34
      World Psychiatry
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Following approval of the ICD-11 by the World Health Assembly in May 2019, World Health Organization (WHO) member states will transition from the ICD-10 to the ICD-11, with reporting of health statistics based on the new system to begin on January 1, 2022. The WHO Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse will publish Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines (CDDG) for ICD-11 Mental, Behavioural and Neurodevelopmental Disorders following ICD-11's approval. The development of the ICD-11 CDDG over the past decade, based on the principles of clinical utility and global applicability, has been the most broadly international, multilingual, multidisciplinary and participative revision process ever implemented for a classification of mental disorders. Innovations in the ICD-11 include the provision of consistent and systematically characterized information, the adoption of a lifespan approach, and culture-related guidance for each disorder. Dimensional approaches have been incorporated into the classification, particularly for personality disorders and primary psychotic disorders, in ways that are consistent with current evidence, are more compatible with recovery-based approaches, eliminate artificial comorbidity, and more effectively capture changes over time. Here we describe major changes to the structure of the ICD-11 classification of mental disorders as compared to the ICD-10, and the development of two new ICD-11 chapters relevant to mental health practice. We illustrate a set of new categories that have been added to the ICD-11 and present the rationale for their inclusion. Finally, we provide a description of the important changes that have been made in each ICD-11 disorder grouping. This information is intended to be useful for both clinicians and researchers in orienting themselves to the ICD-11 and in preparing for implementation in their own professional contexts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized controlled trial.

          Complicated grief is a debilitating disorder associated with important negative health consequences, but the results of existing treatments for it have been disappointing. To compare the efficacy of a novel approach, complicated grief treatment, with a standard psychotherapy (interpersonal psychotherapy). Two-cell, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, stratified by manner of death of loved one and treatment site. A university-based psychiatric research clinic as well as a satellite clinic in a low-income African American community between April 2001 and April 2004. A total of 83 women and 12 men aged 18 to 85 years recruited through professional referral, self-referral, and media announcements who met criteria for complicated grief. Participants were randomly assigned to receive interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 46) or complicated grief treatment (n = 49); both were administered in 16 sessions during an average interval of 19 weeks per participant. Treatment response, defined either as independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Improvement score of 1 or 2 or as time to a 20-point or better improvement in the self-reported Inventory of Complicated Grief. Both treatments produced improvement in complicated grief symptoms. The response rate was greater for complicated grief treatment (51%) than for interpersonal psychotherapy (28%; P = .02) and time to response was faster for complicated grief treatment (P = .02). The number needed to treat was 4.3. Complicated grief treatment is an improved treatment over interpersonal psychotherapy, showing higher response rates and faster time to response.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)

            The diagnosis of mental disorder initially appears relatively straightforward: Patients present with symptoms or visible signs of illness; health professionals make diagnoses based primarily on these symptoms and signs; and they prescribe medication, psychotherapy, or both, accordingly. However, despite a dramatic expansion of knowledge about mental disorders during the past half century, understanding of their components and processes remains rudimentary. We provide histories and descriptions of three systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorder. Two major diagnostic manuals-the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-provide classification systems relevant to public health, clinical diagnosis, service provision, and specific research applications, the former internationally and the latter primarily for the United States. In contrast, the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria provides a framework that emphasizes integration of basic behavioral and neuroscience research to deepen the understanding of mental disorder. We identify four key issues that present challenges to understanding and classifying mental disorder: etiology, including the multiple causality of mental disorder; whether the relevant phenomena are discrete categories or dimensions; thresholds, which set the boundaries between disorder and nondisorder; and comorbidity, the fact that individuals with mental illness often meet diagnostic requirements for multiple conditions. We discuss how the three systems' approaches to these key issues correspond or diverge as a result of their different histories, purposes, and constituencies. Although the systems have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, they share the goal of reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention

              Online gaming has greatly increased in popularity in recent years, and with this has come a multiplicity of problems due to excessive involvement in gaming. Gaming disorder, both online and offline, has been defined for the first time in the draft of 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). National surveys have shown prevalence rates of gaming disorder/addiction of 10%–15% among young people in several Asian countries and of 1%–10% in their counterparts in some Western countries. Several diseases related to excessive gaming are now recognized, and clinics are being established to respond to individual, family, and community concerns, but many cases remain hidden. Gaming disorder shares many features with addictions due to psychoactive substances and with gambling disorder, and functional neuroimaging shows that similar areas of the brain are activated. Governments and health agencies worldwide are seeking for the effects of online gaming to be addressed, and for preventive approaches to be developed. Central to this effort is a need to delineate the nature of the problem, which is the purpose of the definitions in the draft of ICD-11.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                World Psychiatry
                World Psychiatry
                Wiley
                17238617
                February 2019
                February 2019
                January 02 2019
                : 18
                : 1
                : 3-19
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse; World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry; Columbia University Medical Center; New York NY USA
                [3 ]New York State Psychiatric Institute; New York NY USA
                [4 ]School of Psychology; University of Ottawa; Ottawa ON Canada
                [5 ]Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research; Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge MA USA
                [6 ]Department of Psychiatry; University of Ibadan; Ibadan Nigeria
                [7 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty; Heinrich-Heine University; Düsseldorf Germany
                [8 ]Department of Psychiatry; University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”; Naples Italy
                [9 ]Department of Psychiatry; University of Cape Town, and South African Medical Research Council Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders; Cape Town South Africa
                [10 ]Department of Psychology; University of Zurich; Zurich Switzerland
                [11 ]Centre for Mental Health; Imperial College; London UK
                [12 ]Department of Psychiatry; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP/EPM); São Paulo Brazil
                [13 ]Research School of Population Health; Australian National University; Canberra ACT Australia
                [14 ]National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
                [15 ]Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research; University of Queensland; Brisbane QLD Australia
                [16 ]National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz; Mexico City Mexico
                [17 ]Department of Psychiatry; Universidad Autonoma de Madrid; Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM); Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa; Madrid Spain
                [18 ]Department of Neuropsychiatry; Kyushu University; Fukuoka Japan
                [19 ]Department of Psychology; Virginia Commonwealth University; Richmond VA USA
                [20 ]Department of Psychiatry; American University of Beirut Medical Center; Beirut Lebanon
                [21 ]Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry; National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology; Moscow Russian Federation
                [22 ]Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U988; Paris France
                [23 ]Health Management Center; Seitoku University; Matsudo Japan
                [24 ]Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology; Tokyo Japan
                [25 ]Office of Graduate Studies and Clinical Child Psychology Program; University of Kansas; Lawrence KS USA
                [26 ]Department of Psychiatry; All India Institute of Medical Sciences; New Delhi India
                [27 ]Shanghai Mental Health Center and Department of Psychiatry; Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai People's Republic of China
                [28 ]Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry; University of Western Australia; Perth WA Australia
                [29 ]Department of Psychiatry; Prince of Songkla University; Hat Yai Thailand
                [30 ]Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences; Tehran Iran
                [31 ]Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; Karolinska Institute; Stockholm Sweden
                [32 ]International Federation of Social Workers, Basel; Switzerland
                [33 ]Entabeni Hospital; Durban South Africa
                [34 ]Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Boston MA USA
                Article
                10.1002/wps.20611
                6313247
                30600616
                ab805da8-9bf6-4383-801d-f9b2addec817
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article