29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phase I and pharmacological study of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

          Methods:

          Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1–5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored.

          Results:

          In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand–foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months.

          Conclusions:

          Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Metronomic chemotherapy: new rationale for new directions.

          Tumor angiogenesis is recognized as a major therapeutic target in the fight against cancer. The key involvement of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis has started to redefine chemotherapy and new protocols have emerged. Metronomic chemotherapy, which is intended to prevent tumor angiogenesis, is based on more frequent and low-dose drug administrations compared with conventional chemotherapy. The potential of metronomic chemotherapy was revealed in animal models a decade ago and the efficacy of this approach has been confirmed in the clinic. In the past 5 years, multiple clinical trials have investigated the safety and efficacy of metronomic chemotherapy in a variety of human cancers. While the results have been variable, clinical studies have shown that these new treatment protocols represent an interesting alternative for either primary systemic therapy or maintenance therapy. We review the latest clinical trials of metronomic chemotherapy in adult and pediatric cancer patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that the efficacy of such treatment may not only rely on anti-angiogenic activity. Potential new mechanisms of action, such as restoration of anticancer immune response and induction of tumor dormancy are discussed. Finally, we highlight the research efforts that need to be made to facilitate the optimal development of metronomic chemotherapy.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

            For patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), further chemotherapy is routinely considered at relapse after first-line therapy. However, proof of clinical benefit has not been documented. This study randomly assigned patients with relapsed SCLC not considered as candidates for standard intravenous therapy to best supportive care (BSC) alone (n = 70) or oral topotecan (2.3 mg/m2/d, days 1 through 5, every 21 days) plus BSC (topotecan; n = 71). In the intent-to-treat population, survival (primary end point) was prolonged in the topotecan group (log-rank P = .0104). Median survival with BSC was 13.9 weeks (95% CI, 11.1 to 18.6) and with topotecan, 25.9 weeks (95% CI, 18.3 to 31.6). Statistical significance for survival was maintained in a subgroup of patients with a short treatment-free interval (< or = 60 days). Response to topotecan was 7% partial and 44% stable disease. Patients on topotecan had slower quality of life deterioration and greater symptom control. Principal toxicities with topotecan were hematological: grade 4 neutropenia, 33%; grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 7%; and grade 3/4 anemia, 25%. Comparing topotecan with BSC, infection grade 2 was 14% versus 12% and sepsis 4% versus 1%; other grade 3/4 events included vomiting 3% versus 0, diarrhea 6% versus 0, dyspnea 3% versus 9%, and pain 3% versus 6%. Toxic deaths occurred in four patients (6%) in the topotecan arm. All cause mortality within 30 days of random assignment was 13% on BSC and 7% on topotecan. Chemotherapy with oral topotecan is associated with prolongation of survival and quality of life benefit in patients with relapsed SCLC.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Subcellular localization and distribution of the breast cancer resistance protein transporter in normal human tissues.

              High expression of the Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) gene has been shown to be involved in resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Knowledge of the localization of BCRP protein in normal tissues may help unravel the normal function of this protein. Therefore, we characterized the tissue distribution and cellular localization of BCRP in frozen sections of normal human tissues. For this purpose, we used the recently described monoclonal antibody BXP-34 and another independently developed monoclonal antibody directed against BCRP, BXP-21. Both monoclonal antibodies show specific BCRP plasma membrane staining on cytospins obtained from topotecan- or mitoxantrone-selected cell lines, as well as from BCRP-transfected cell lines. Immunoprecipitation experiments using either BXP-21 or BXP-34 yielded a clear M(r) 72,000 BCRP band from BCRP-overexpressing tumor cells. In the topotecan-selected T8 and mitoxantrone-selected MX3 tumor cell lines, BCRP turned out to be differentially glycosylated. In contrast to BXP-34, BXP-21 is able to detect the M(r) 72,000 BCRP protein on immunoblots and is reactive with BCRP in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Using BXP-21 and BXP-34, prominent staining of BCRP was observed in placental syncytiotrophoblasts, in the epithelium of the small intestine and colon, in the liver canalicular membrane, and in ducts and lobules of the breast. Furthermore, BCRP was present in veinous and capillary endothelium, but not in arterial endothelium in all of the tissues investigated. In the tissues studied, the mRNA levels of BCRP were assessed using reverse transcription-PCR, and these corresponded with the levels of BCRP protein estimated from immunohistochemical staining. The presence of BCRP at the placental syncytiotrophoblasts is consistent with the hypothesis of a protective role of BCRP for the fetus. The apical localization in the epithelium of the small intestine and colon indicates a possible role of BCRP in the regulation of the uptake of p.o. administered BCRP substrates by back-transport of substrate drugs entering from the gut lumen. Therefore, it may be useful to attempt to modulate the uptake of p.o. delivered BCRP substrates, e.g., topotecan or irinotecan, by using a BCRP inhibitor. Clinical trials testing this hypothesis have been initiated in our institute.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Br J Cancer
                Br. J. Cancer
                British Journal of Cancer
                Nature Publishing Group
                0007-0920
                1532-1827
                01 September 2015
                20 August 2015
                : 113
                : 5
                : 706-715
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
                [5 ]GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park , North Carolina, USA
                [6 ]Science Faculty, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Article
                bjc2015257
                10.1038/bjc.2015.257
                4559826
                26291057
                ab943352-27d5-4cbe-9bcf-19f125d3225a
                Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK

                From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

                History
                : 28 January 2015
                : 20 May 2015
                : 27 May 2015
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                pazopanib,topotecan,ovarian cancer
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                pazopanib, topotecan, ovarian cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log