4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 18F-Fluciclovine (FACBC) PET and multisequence multiparametric MRI

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this prospective single-institution clinical trial (NCT02002455) was to evaluate the potential of advanced post-processing methods for 18F-Fluciclovine PET and multisequence multiparametric MRI in the prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness, defined by Gleason Grade Group (GGG). 21 patients with PCa underwent PET/CT, PET/MRI and MRI before prostatectomy. DWI was post-processed using kurtosis (ADC k, K), mono- (ADC m), and biexponential functions (f, D p, D f) while Logan plots were used to calculate volume of distribution (V T). In total, 16 unique PET (V T, SUV) and MRI derived quantitative parameters were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out to estimate the potential of the quantitative parameters and their combinations to predict GGG 1 vs >1, using logistic regression with a nested leave-pair out cross validation (LPOCV) scheme and recursive feature elimination technique applied for feature selection. The second order rotating frame imaging (RAFF), monoexponential and kurtosis derived parameters had LPOCV AUC in the range of 0.72 to 0.92 while the corresponding value for V T was 0.85. The best performance for GGG prediction was achieved by K parameter of kurtosis function followed by quantitative parameters based on DWI, RAFF and 18F-FACBC PET. No major improvement was achieved using parameter combinations with or without feature selection. Addition of 18F-FACBC PET derived parameters (V T, SUV) to DWI and RAFF derived parameters did not improve LPOCV AUC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

          Although the initial robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) series showed 12-mo potency rates ranging from 70% to 80%, the few available comparative studies did not permit any definitive conclusion about the superiority of this technique when compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). The aims of this systematic review were (1) to evaluate the current prevalence and the potential risk factors of erectile dysfunction after RARP, (2) to identify surgical techniques able to improve the rate of potency recovery after RARP, and (3) to perform a cumulative analysis of all available studies comparing RARP versus RRP or LRP. A literature search was performed in August 2011 using the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only comparative studies or clinical series including >100 cases reporting potency recovery outcomes were included in this review. Cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager v.4.2 software designed for composing Cochrane Reviews (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). We analyzed 15 case series, 6 studies comparing different techniques in the context of RARP, 6 studies comparing RARP with RRP, and 4 studies comparing RARP with LRP. The 12- and 24-mo potency rates ranged from 54% to 90% and from 63% to 94%, respectively. Age, baseline potency status, comorbidities index, and extension of the nerve-sparing procedure represent the most relevant preoperative and intraoperative predictors of potency recovery after RARP. Available data seem to support the use of cautery-free dissection or the use of pinpointed low-energy cauterization. Cumulative analyses showed better 12-mo potency rates after RARP in comparison with RRP (odds ratio [OR]: 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-5.43; p=0.002). Only a nonstatistically significant trend in favor of RARP was reported after comparison with LRP (OR: 1.89; p=0.21). The incidence of potency recovery after RARP is influenced by numerous factors. Data coming from the present systematic review support the use of a cautery-free technique. This update of previous systematic reviews of the literature showed, for the first time, a significant advantage in favor of RARP in comparison with RRP in terms of 12-mo potency rates. Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Use of Spin Echoes in a Pulsed Magnetic-Field Gradient to Study Anisotropic, Restricted Diffusion and Flow

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers.

              Jean Logan (2000)
              The differential equations of compartmental analysis form the basis of the models describing the uptake of tracers used in imaging studies. Graphical analyses convert the model equations into linear plots, the slopes of which represent measures of tracer binding. The graphical methods are not dependent upon a particular model structure but the slopes can be related to combinations of the model parameters if a model structure is assumed. The input required is uptake data from a region of interest vs time and an input function that can either be plasma measurements or uptake data from a suitable reference region. Graphical methods can be applied to both reversible and irreversibly binding tracers. They provide considerable ease of computation compared to the optimization of individual model parameters in the solution of the differential equations generally used to describe the binding of tracers. Conditions under which the graphical techniques are applicable and some problems encountered in separating tracer delivery and binding are considered. Also the effect of noise can introduce a bias in the distribution volume which is the slope of the graphical analysis of reversible tracers. Smoothing techniques may minimize this problem and retain the model independence. In any case graphical techniques can provide insight into the binding kinetics of tracers in a visual way.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ivjamb@utu.fi
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                10 June 2020
                10 June 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 9407
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 1371, GRID grid.1374.1, Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, ; Turku, Finland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 1371, GRID grid.1374.1, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, ; Turku, Finland
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 1371, GRID grid.1374.1, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku and Department of Pathology, Turku University, Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0391 4481, GRID grid.470895.7, Turku PET Centre, Turku University and Turku University Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, GRID grid.410552.7, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, GRID grid.410552.7, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, GRID grid.410552.7, Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, GRID grid.410552.7, Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0726 2490, GRID grid.9668.1, A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, ; Kuopio, Finland
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0941 4873, GRID grid.10858.34, Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, ; Oulu, Finland
                [11 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4685 4917, GRID grid.412326.0, Department of Clinical Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, ; Oulu, Finland
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0628 215X, GRID grid.410552.7, Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, ; Turku, Finland
                [13 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, GRID grid.59734.3c, Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, ; New York, USA
                Article
                66255
                10.1038/s41598-020-66255-8
                7287051
                32523075
                ab9cb66b-c9b9-4024-8136-f26aa229f792
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 October 2019
                : 4 May 2020
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                urology,prostate,oncology,cancer
                Uncategorized
                urology, prostate, oncology, cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article