5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Feasibility Study of a Modified XELOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Recurrence Risk Patients With Operated Stage III Colon Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Our previous study reported the favorable efficacy and good tolerance associated with a modified XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy with eight cycles of capecitabine and six cycles of oxaliplatin for operated stage III colon cancer. The current study aimed to confirm the feasibility of modified XELOX chemotherapy for treating specific high-risk (T4, N2, or both) stage III colon cancer.

          Methods

          We selected 142 consecutive patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer who received colon tumor resection followed by modified XELOX or standard full-cycle XELOX chemotherapy from November 2007 to June 2016 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events of patients treated with the two chemotherapy regimens were compared.

          Results

          Seventy-four (52.1%) patients received standard XELOX chemotherapy, and 68 (47.8%) received modified XELOX chemotherapy. Neurotoxicity was the most common adverse event in 99 (69.7%) patients. Grade 2-3 neurotoxicity, grade 2–4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3–4 leucopenia were the major severe adverse events related to the decision to treat patients with modified XELOX chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 69 months, the modified XELOX group presented a comparable 5-year DFS rate (79.0 vs. 80.3%, P = 0.891) and 5-year OS rate (93.8 vs. 87.8%, P = 0.446) as those in the standard XELOX group. Univariate survival analysis indicated that poor tumor differentiation (HR: 2.381, 95% CI: 1.141–4.968, P = 0.021) was the only significant risk factor for DFS, but no significant prognostic factor was identified for OS.

          Conclusions

          The modified XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy presented a comparable oncologic efficacy as standard XELOX chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer. The modified XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy could be an alternative treatment for patients suffering severe adverse events, especially severe neurotoxicity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer

          BACKGROUND Since 2004, a regimen of 6 months of treatment with oxaliplatin plus a fluoropyrimidine has been standard adjuvant therapy in patients with stage III colon cancer. However, since oxaliplatin is associated with cumulative neurotoxicity, a shorter duration of therapy could spare toxic effects and health expenditures. METHODS We performed a prospective, preplanned, pooled analysis of six randomized, phase 3 trials that were conducted concurrently to evaluate the noninferiority of adjuvant therapy with either FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) administered for 3 months, as compared with 6 months. The primary end point was the rate of disease-free survival at 3 years. Noninferiority of 3 months versus 6 months of therapy could be claimed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio did not exceed 1.12. RESULTS After 3263 events of disease recurrence or death had been reported in 12,834 patients, the noninferiority of 3 months of treatment versus 6 months was not confirmed in the overall study population (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.15). Noninferiority of the shorter regimen was seen for CAPOX (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.06) but not for FOLFOX (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.26). In an exploratory analysis of the combined regimens, among the patients with T1, T2, or T3 and N1 cancers, 3 months of therapy was noninferior to 6 months, with a 3-year rate of disease-free survival of 83.1% and 83.3%, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.12). Among patients with cancers that were classified as T4, N2, or both, the disease-free survival rate for a 6-month duration of therapy was superior to that for a 3-month duration (64.4% vs. 62.7%) for the combined treatments (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.23; P = 0.01 for superiority). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant therapy with FOLFOX or CAPOX, noninferiority of 3 months of therapy, as compared with 6 months, was not confirmed in the overall population. However, in patients treated with CAPOX, 3 months of therapy was as effective as 6 months, particularly in the lower-risk subgroup. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical Course of Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathy: Results From the Randomized Phase III Trial N08CB (Alliance).

            Given that the clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is not well defined, the current study was performed to better understand clinical parameters associated with its presentation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Subgroups and prognostication in stage III colon cancer: future perspectives for adjuvant therapy.

              Since the MOSAIC study, oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard treatment of stage III colon cancer. Combination therapy with fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin has improved overall survival (OS) and reduced the risk of recurrence in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. However, only 20% of patients really benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, exposing 80% of patients to unnecessary toxicity. Recent analyses of large multicenter adjuvant studies have focused on the prognostication of OS and disease-free survival in stage III colon cancer in order to reduce over-treatment and to find more accurate prognostic tools than those used for adjuvant treatment decision-making in stage II disease. Indeed, clinical and pathological prognostic factors, although important, are not sufficient to decide which stage III patients will benefit from adjuvant therapy, and biomarkers will help select patient that need adjuvant treatment. Molecular markers such as microsatellite status and BRAF and KRAS mutations have recently been explored, and molecular signatures have been identified as promising prognostic factor for OS. Furthermore, recent studies have highlighted the prognostic value of immune infiltration. This review focuses on pathologic, immunologic and molecular prognostic markers for stage III colon cancer that could help clinicians tailor adjuvant treatment in a comprehensive transversal approach.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                18 September 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 583091
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine , Guangzhou, China
                [2] 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine , Guangzhou, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Yingyan Yu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

                Reviewed by: Rui Zhang, China Medical University, China; Xianwei Mo, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, China; Shisheng Tan, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, China

                *Correspondence: Junzhong Lin, linjzh@ 123456sysucc.org.cn ; Xiaoping Lin, linxp@ 123456sysucc.org.cn

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                10.3389/fphar.2020.583091
                7543913
                33071795
                aba80a63-1874-4c5d-807e-64ad55039e21
                Copyright © 2020 Peng, Li, Fan, Zhou, Zhu, Li, Pan, Lin and Lin

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 July 2020
                : 04 September 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 23, Pages: 8, Words: 4368
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: 81772595, 81871991
                Funded by: Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 10.13039/501100003453
                Award ID: 2018A030310239
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Original Research

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                colon cancer,adjuvant chemotherapy,xelox (capeox),high risk,feasibility

                Comments

                Comment on this article