25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Acute aluminium phosphide poisoning: Can we predict survival?

      letter
       
      Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
      Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, I read with interest the study conducted by Mathai and Bhanu published in your journal.[1] So far, several similar studies have been performed to determine the risk factors of mortality among aluminium phosphide (ALP)-poisoned patients. Almost all of these studies have shown that the more the patient is ill on admission, the higher is the risk of death.[1–4] But, I think that in this poisoning with such a high mortality rate, we should be able to predict the probability of survival instead of prediction of death. In other words, when the conscious ALP-poisoned patient or his/her relatives ask whether he/she would survive, we should be prepared to answer this question. I think this question is easy to be answered and depends on the fact that the lesser is the liberated phosphine from the tablets in the stomach, the higher is the survival rate. Therefore, if the patient vomits immediately after the ingestion due to the unpleasant taste and odor of the tablet, he/she will possibly survive.[4 5] But, vomiting occurring in concordance with other signs and symptoms of poisoning can be a sign of severity of the poisoning and cannot predict the probability of survival. Also, if the patient has dissolved the tablet in water before ingestion [Figure 1], he/she is most likely to survive. This is because a great part of the phosphine gas has escaped before its consumption. Interestingly, some studies have shown that there is no association between ALP-ingested dose and mortality rate.[2] The question is, “Why?” This depends on the physical characteristics of the ALP tablets. In other words, if we have access to a sample of the ingested tablet [Figure 1], we can determine from the pores on its surface whether that tablet has been exposed or not and, therefore, predict the probability of the patient's survival.[6] In countries such as Iran, where ALP tablets are also known as rice tablets, its similar components are manufactured from the herbal materials that are not dangerous and will not cause death. Thus, if the patient has ingested from the latter type of the rice tablet, he/she will definitely survive.[6] In conclusion, if the patient has ingested a small amount of the tablet, has vomited immediately after the ingestion, has dissolved the tablet in water before its consumption and has used a herbal tablet or an exposed tablet whose phosphine gas has previously been eliminated, he/she will more likely survive. Elapsed time between the ingestion and hospital presentation as well as proper supportive care should certainly not be forgotten. Figure 1 Tablets of aluminium phosphide: (a) in water while releasing phosphine gas, (b) just placed and (c) exposed form (porous feature)

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Acute aluminium phosphide poisoning: Can we predict mortality?

          In India, acute aluminium phosphide poisoning (AAlPP) is a serious health care problem. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of AAlPP and the predictors of mortality at the time of patients’ admission. We studied consecutive admissions of patients with AAlPP admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between November 2004 and October 2006. We noted 38 parameters at admission to the hospital and the ICU and compared survivor and non-survivor groups. A total of 27 patients were enrolled comprising5 females and 22 males and the mean ingested dose of poison was 0.75 ± 0.745 grams. Hypotension was noted in 24 patients (89%) at admission and electrocardiogram abnormalities were noted in 13 patients (48.1%). The mean pH on admission was 7.20 ± 0.14 and the mean bicarbonate concentration was 12.32 ± 5.45 mmol/ L. The mortality from AAlPP was 59.3%. We found the following factors to be associated with an increased risk of mortality: a serum creatinine concentration of more than 1.0 mg % (P = 0.01), pH value less than 7.2 (P = 0.014), serum bicarbonate value less than 15 mmol/L (P = 0.048), need for mechanical ventilation (P = 0.045), need for vasoactive drugs like dobutamine (P = 0.027) and nor adrenaline (P = 0.048) and a low APACHE II score at admission (P = 0.019). AAlPP causes high mortality primarily due to early haemodynamic failure and multi-organ dysfunction
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A retrospective 7-years study of aluminum phosphide poisoning in Tehran: opportunities for prevention.

            The objective of this study was to survey aluminum phosphide (AIP) poisoning in a referral poisoning hospital in Tehran servicing an estimation of 10,000,000 populations. Records of all patients admitted and hospitalized during a period of 7 years from January 2000 to January 2007 were collected and analyzed according to gender, age, cause of intoxication, amount of AIP consumed, route of exposure, time between exposure and onset of treatment, signs and symptoms of intoxication at admission, therapeutic intervention, laboratory tests, and outcome. During the studied years, 471 patients were admitted to the hospital with AIP poisoning; 50% of them were men. The overall case fatality ratio was 31%. The mean age was 27.1 years, and most of the patients were between 20 and 40 years old. Self-poisoning was observed in 93% of cases. The average ingested dose was 5.1 g, and most of the patients (73%) consumed 1-3 tablets of AIP. A wide range of symptoms and signs was seen on admission, but the most common one was cardiovascular manifestations (78.12%). The majority (65%) of patients were from Tehran. Poisoning in spring and winter (34% and 24%, respectively) was more common than other seasons. Gastric decontamination with potassium permanganate, and administration of calcium gluconate, magnesium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, and charcoal were considered for most of the patients. Mean arterial blood pH was 7.23 and bicarbonate concentration was 12.7 mEq/L. One-hundred percent of patients with blood pH or= 7.35 survived. Electrocardiogram (EKG) abnormalities were noted in 65.6% of cases. There was a significant difference between survival and non-survival according to pH, HCO(3) concentration, and EKG abnormality. Even without an increase in resources, there appears to be significant opportunities for reducing mortality by better medical management and further restrictions on the AIP tablets usage. Arterial blood pH seems to be a prognostic factor for the outcome of AIP-poisoned patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Rice tablet poisoning: a major concern in Iranian population.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Anaesth
                Indian J Anaesth
                IJA
                Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0019-5049
                0976-2817
                Mar-Apr 2012
                : 56
                : 2
                : 207-208
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Hossein Sanaei-Zadeh, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital, Niayesh Street, Sattar-Khan Ave., Postal Code: 1445613131, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: h-sanaiezadeh@ 123456tums.ac.ir
                Article
                IJA-56-207
                10.4103/0019-5049.96319
                3371510
                22701226
                abe8bf84-8a48-430c-8e02-12ce43dcae5e
                Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to Editor

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                Anesthesiology & Pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article