2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Accuracy of breast MRI in patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with clinical and pathological assessments

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in locally advanced oestrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast tumours before, during and after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) for evaluation of tumour response in comparison with clinical and pathological assessments.

          Methods

          This prospective study enrolled postmenopausal patients treated neoadjuvant with letrozole and exemestane given sequentially in an intra-patient cross-over regimen. Fifty-four patients were initially recruited, but only 35 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and confirmed to participate with a median age of 77. Tumours were scanned with MRI prior to treatment, during the eighth week of treatment and prior to surgery. Additionally, changes in longest diameter on clinical examination (CE) and tumour size at pathology were determined. Pre- and post-operative measurements of tumour size were compared in order to evaluate tumour response.

          Results

          The correlation between post-treatment MRI size and pathology was moderate and higher with a correlation coefficient ( r) 0.64 compared to the correlation between CE and pathology r = 0.25. Post-treatment MRI and clinical results had a negligible bias towards underestimation of lesion size. Tumour size on MRI and CE had 0.82 cm and 0.52 cm lower mean size than tumour size measured by pathology, respectively.

          Conclusions

          The higher correlation between measurements of residual disease obtained on MRI and those obtained with pathology validates the accuracy of imaging assessment during NET. MRI was found to be more accurate for estimating complete responses than clinical assessments and warrants further investigation in larger cohorts to validate this finding.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05852-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

          Assessment of the change in tumour burden is an important feature of the clinical evaluation of cancer therapeutics: both tumour shrinkage (objective response) and disease progression are useful endpoints in clinical trials. Since RECIST was published in 2000, many investigators, cooperative groups, industry and government authorities have adopted these criteria in the assessment of treatment outcomes. However, a number of questions and issues have arisen which have led to the development of a revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Evidence for changes, summarised in separate papers in this special issue, has come from assessment of a large data warehouse (>6500 patients), simulation studies and literature reviews. HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISED RECIST 1.1: Major changes include: Number of lesions to be assessed: based on evidence from numerous trial databases merged into a data warehouse for analysis purposes, the number of lesions required to assess tumour burden for response determination has been reduced from a maximum of 10 to a maximum of five total (and from five to two per organ, maximum). Assessment of pathological lymph nodes is now incorporated: nodes with a short axis of 15 mm are considered measurable and assessable as target lesions. The short axis measurement should be included in the sum of lesions in calculation of tumour response. Nodes that shrink to <10mm short axis are considered normal. Confirmation of response is required for trials with response primary endpoint but is no longer required in randomised studies since the control arm serves as appropriate means of interpretation of data. Disease progression is clarified in several aspects: in addition to the previous definition of progression in target disease of 20% increase in sum, a 5mm absolute increase is now required as well to guard against over calling PD when the total sum is very small. Furthermore, there is guidance offered on what constitutes 'unequivocal progression' of non-measurable/non-target disease, a source of confusion in the original RECIST guideline. Finally, a section on detection of new lesions, including the interpretation of FDG-PET scan assessment is included. Imaging guidance: the revised RECIST includes a new imaging appendix with updated recommendations on the optimal anatomical assessment of lesions. A key question considered by the RECIST Working Group in developing RECIST 1.1 was whether it was appropriate to move from anatomic unidimensional assessment of tumour burden to either volumetric anatomical assessment or to functional assessment with PET or MRI. It was concluded that, at present, there is not sufficient standardisation or evidence to abandon anatomical assessment of tumour burden. The only exception to this is in the use of FDG-PET imaging as an adjunct to determination of progression. As is detailed in the final paper in this special issue, the use of these promising newer approaches requires appropriate clinical validation studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              4th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                joana.reis@ahus.no , joanaroquedosreis@gmail.com
                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res Treat
                Breast Cancer Res Treat
                Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
                Springer US (New York )
                0167-6806
                1573-7217
                12 August 2020
                12 August 2020
                2020
                : 184
                : 2
                : 407-420
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, , Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [2 ]GRID grid.5510.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8921, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus AHUS, , University of Oslo, ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [3 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Health Services Research Unit, , Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [4 ]Sunnmøre MR-Clinic, Agrinorbygget, Langelansveg 15, 6010 Ålesund, Norway
                [5 ]GRID grid.55325.34, ISNI 0000 0004 0389 8485, Department of Pathology, , Oslo University Hospital (OUS), ; Postboks 4956, 0424 Nydalen, Norway
                [6 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, , Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [7 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Department of Oncology, , Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [8 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Translational Cancer Research Group, , Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                [9 ]GRID grid.411279.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9637 455X, Department of Pathology, , Akershus University Hospital (AHUS), ; Postboks 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0515-2022
                Article
                5852
                10.1007/s10549-020-05852-7
                7599143
                32789592
                abea47b9-3f83-4447-924a-d4c7ea5168a0
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 May 2020
                : 31 July 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Akershus University Hospital (AHUS)
                Categories
                Clinical Trial
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                tumour response,breast cancer,neoadjuvant therapy,magnetic resonance
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                tumour response, breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, magnetic resonance

                Comments

                Comment on this article