22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploiting hot-spots; effective determination of lichen diversity in a Carpathian virgin forest

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although lichenized fungi are among the most reliable indicators of forest quality and represent a considerable part of forest biodiversity, methods maximizing completeness of their species lists per area are lacking. Employing a novel methodological approach including a multi-expert competition and a search for local hot-spot plots, we have obtained outstanding data about epiphytic lichen biota in a part of the largest Central European virgin forest reserve Uholka–Shyrokyi Luh situated in Ukrainian Carpathians. Our field research consisted of two four-day periods: (1) an overall floristic survey and a search for spots with raised lichen diversity, and (2) survey in four one-hectare plots established in lichen diversity hot-spots along an altitudinal gradient. Recorded alpha-diversities in plots ranged from 181–228 species, but estimated species richness is in the range 207–322 species. Detected gamma-diversity was 387 species; estimates are 409–484 species. 93% of the species found in the forest were recorded in plots, but only 65% outside the plots. This underlines the high-efficiency of the multi-expert competitive survey in diversity hot-spot plots. Species richness in each one-hectare plot was equal to the numbers of species obtained by floristic surveys of much larger old-growth forest areas in Central Europe. Gamma-diversity detected in the Uholka primeval forest far exceeded all numbers achieved in Central European old-growth forests. Our method appears to be both effective (it obtains a more nearly complete inventory of species) and practical (the resources required are not unreasonably large).

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe.

          Past and present pressures on forest resources have led to a drastic decrease in the surface area of unmanaged forests in Europe. Changes in forest structure, composition, and dynamics inevitably lead to changes in the biodiversity of forest-dwelling species. The possible biodiversity gains and losses due to forest management (i.e., anthropogenic pressures related to direct forest resource use), however, have never been assessed at a pan-European scale. We used meta-analysis to review 49 published papers containing 120 individual comparisons of species richness between unmanaged and managed forests throughout Europe. We explored the response of different taxonomic groups and the variability of their response with respect to time since abandonment and intensity of forest management. Species richness was slightly higher in unmanaged than in managed forests. Species dependent on forest cover continuity, deadwood, and large trees (bryophytes, lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles) and carabids were negatively affected by forest management. In contrast, vascular plant species were favored. The response for birds was heterogeneous and probably depended more on factors such as landscape patterns. The global difference in species richness between unmanaged and managed forests increased with time since abandonment and indicated a gradual recovery of biodiversity. Clearcut forests in which the composition of tree species changed had the strongest effect on species richness, but the effects of different types of management on taxa could not be assessed in a robust way because of low numbers of replications in the management-intensity classes. Our results show that some taxa are more affected by forestry than others, but there is a need for research into poorly studied species groups in Europe and in particular locations. Our meta-analysis supports the need for a coordinated European research network to study and monitor the biodiversity of different taxa in managed and unmanaged forests.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Tree related microhabitats in temperate and Mediterranean European forests: A hierarchical typology for inventory standardization

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Crustose lichens as indicators of forest continuity in boreal coniferous forests

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Investigation
                Role: Formal analysis
                Role: Project administration
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                13 September 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 9
                : e0203540
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic
                [2 ] Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
                [3 ] Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Botany, Czech Republic
                [4 ] National Museum, Department of Mycology, Cirkusová, Horní Počernice Czech Republic
                [5 ] Independent Researcher, Kopfing, Austria
                [6 ] Independent Researcher, Southampton, United Kingdom
                [7 ] Independent Researcher, Taynuilt, United Kingdom
                [8 ] Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Suchdol, Czech Republic
                [9 ] Laboratory for Environmental Protection, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine
                Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7568-6711
                Article
                PONE-D-18-05229
                10.1371/journal.pone.0203540
                6136740
                30212494
                abf34d8a-180e-4ed3-9fc0-469eed33aac5
                © 2018 Vondrák et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 February 2018
                : 22 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 5, Pages: 19
                Funding
                Funded by: Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences
                Award ID: RVO 67985939
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007543, Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova;
                Award ID: 647412
                Award Recipient :
                Our research was supported by a long-term research development grant RVO 67985939 and by the grant 647412 of The Charles University Grant Agency.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Forests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Terrestrial Environments
                Forests
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Plant Science
                Lichenology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Trees
                Beeches
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Trees
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Biodiversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Forest Ecology
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Data
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article