11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Informal caregiving patterns and trajectories of psychological distress in the UK Household Longitudinal Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Approximately seven million people in the UK are engaged in informal caregiving. Informal caregivers are at risk of poorer mental and physical health. However, less is known about how the relationship between the informal caregiving and psychological distress changes over time. The aim of this study was to investigate longitudinal associations between the informal caregiving and psychological distress amongst UK men and women aged 16+.

          Methods

          Data were analysed from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS, n = 9368), a nationally representative study of UK households. Longitudinal linear mixed modelling was used to estimate associations between the longitudinal patterns of informal caregiving (non-caregiver/one episode of 1–2 years/intermittent caregiving/3+ years caregiving) and trajectories of psychological distress across seven waves of UKHLS data.

          Results

          Informal caregiving was not associated with psychological distress for men. Women engaged in long-term (⩾3 years) or intermittent caregiving had higher levels of psychological distress at the point of initiation, compared with women who were not caregivers throughout the study period (3+ years caregiver: regression coefficient 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.89; intermittent caregiver: regression coefficient 0.47, 95% CI 0.02–0.92). Trajectories of psychological distress changed little over time, suggesting a plateau effect for these caregiving women.

          Conclusions

          Women engaged in long-term or repeated shorter episodes of informal caregiving reported more symptoms of psychological distress than non-caregiving women. Given the increased risk of reporting psychological distress and the increasing importance of the informal care sector, the risk of poorer mental health of informal caregivers should be a priority for public health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Correlates of Physical Health of Informal Caregivers: A Meta-Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures.

              This paper views caregiver stress as a consequence of a process comprising a number of interrelated conditions, including the socioeconomic characteristics and resources of caregivers and the primary and secondary stressors to which they are exposed. Primary stressors are hardships and problems anchored directly in caregiving. Secondary stressors fall into two categories: the strains experienced in roles and activities outside of caregiving, and intrapsychic strains, involving the diminishment of self-concepts. Coping and social support can potentially intervene at multiple points along the stress process.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychol Med
                Psychol Med
                PSM
                Psychological Medicine
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                0033-2917
                1469-8978
                July 2019
                12 September 2018
                : 49
                : 10
                : 1652-1660
                Affiliations
                [1]Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London , London WC1E 6BT, UK
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: Rebecca E. Lacey, E-mail: Rebecca.lacey@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-0795
                Article
                S0033291718002222 00222
                10.1017/S0033291718002222
                6601356
                30205848
                ac004e70-eba9-48d4-bd63-0b16e80324b6
                © Cambridge University Press 2018

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 January 2018
                : 12 June 2018
                : 01 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, References: 38, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Original Articles

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                caregiving,longitudinal,panel study,psychological distress,uk household longitudinal study

                Comments

                Comment on this article