50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative study of perceived needs and factors associated with the quality of care for common mental disorders in patients with chronic diseases: the perspective of primary care clinicians and patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The prevalence of comorbid anxiety and depressive disorders is high among patients with chronic diseases in primary care, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The detection and treatment of common mental disorders in patients with chronic diseases can be challenging in the primary care setting. This study aims to explore the perceived needs, barriers and facilitators for the delivery of mental health care for patients with coexisting common mental disorders and chronic diseases in primary care from the clinician and patient perspectives.

          Methods

          In this qualitative descriptive study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians (family physician, nurse, psychologist, social worker; n = 18) and patients ( n = 10) from three primary care clinics in Quebec, Canada. The themes explored included clinician factors (e.g., attitudes, perception of roles, collaboration, management of clinical priorities) and patient factors (e.g., needs, preferences, access to care, communication with health professionals) associated with the delivery of care. Qualitative data analysis was conducted based on an interactive cyclical process of data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing and verification.

          Results

          Clinician interviews highlighted a number of needs, barriers and enablers in the provision of patient services, which related to inter-professional collaboration, access to psychotherapy, polypharmacy as well as communication and coordination of services within the primary care clinic and the local network. Two specific facilitators associated with optimal mental health care were the broadening of nurses’ functions in mental health care and the active integration of consulting psychiatrists. Patients corroborated the issues raised by the clinicians, particularly in the domains of whole-person care, service accessibility and care management.

          Conclusions

          The results of this project will contribute to the development of quality improvement interventions to increase the uptake of organizational and clinical evidence-based practices for patients with chronic diseases and concurrent common mental disorders, in priority areas including collaborative care, access to psychotherapy and linkages with specialized mental health care.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0531-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood, and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO world mental health surveys.

          Mental disorders are major causes of disability worldwide, including in the low-income and middle-income countries least able to bear such burdens. We describe mental health care in 17 countries participating in the WHO world mental health (WMH) survey initiative and examine unmet needs for treatment. Face-to-face household surveys were undertaken with 84,850 community adult respondents in low-income or middle-income (Colombia, Lebanon, Mexico, Nigeria, China, South Africa, Ukraine) and high-income countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, USA). Prevalence and severity of mental disorders over 12 months, and mental health service use, were assessed with the WMH composite international diagnostic interview. Logistic regression analysis was used to study sociodemographic predictors of receiving any 12-month services. The number of respondents using any 12-month mental health services (57 [2%; Nigeria] to 1477 [18%; USA]) was generally lower in developing than in developed countries, and the proportion receiving services tended to correspond to countries' percentages of gross domestic product spent on health care. Although seriousness of disorder was related to service use, only five (11%; China) to 46 (61%; Belgium) of patients with severe disorders received any care in the previous year. General medical sectors were the largest sources of mental health services. For respondents initiating treatments, 152 (70%; Germany) to 129 (95%; Italy) received any follow-up care, and one (10%; Nigeria) to 113 (42%; France) received treatments meeting minimum standards for adequacy. Patients who were male, married, less-educated, and at the extremes of age or income were treated less. Unmet needs for mental health treatment are pervasive and especially concerning in less-developed countries. Alleviation of these unmet needs will require expansion and optimum allocation of treatment resources.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.

            Evidence-based practice involves the consideration of efficacy and effectiveness, clinical expertise, and patient preference in treatment selection. However, patient preference for psychiatric treatment has been understudied. The aim of this meta-analytic review was to provide an estimate of the proportion of patients preferring psychological treatment relative to medication for psychiatric disorders. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Collaboration library through August 2011 for studies written in English that assessed adult patient preferences for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The following search terms and subject headings were used in combination: patient preference, consumer preference, therapeutics, psychotherapy, drug therapy, mental disorders, depression, anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, substance-related disorder, eating disorder, and personality disorder. In addition, the reference sections of identified articles were examined to locate any additional articles not captured by this search. Studies that assessed preferred type of treatment and included at least 1 psychological treatment and 1 pharmacologic treatment were included. Of the 644 articles identified, 34 met criteria for inclusion. Authors extracted relevant data including the proportion of participants reporting preference for psychological or pharmacologic treatment. The proportion of adult patients preferring psychological treatment was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80), which was significantly higher than equivalent preference (ie, higher than 0.50; P < .001). Sensitivity analyses suggested that younger patients (P = .05) and women (P < .01) were significantly more likely to choose psychological treatment. A preference for psychological treatment was consistently evident in both treatment-seeking and unselected (ie, non-treatment-seeking) samples (P < .001 for both) but was somewhat stronger for unselected samples. Aggregation of patient preferences across diverse settings yielded a significant 3-fold preference for psychological treatment. Given evidence for enhanced outcomes among those receiving their preferred psychiatric treatment and the trends for decreasing utilization of psychotherapy, strategies to maximize the linkage of patients to preferred care are needed. © Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the management of anxiety, posttraumatic stress and obsessive-compulsive disorders

              Background Anxiety and related disorders are among the most common mental disorders, with lifetime prevalence reportedly as high as 31%. Unfortunately, anxiety disorders are under-diagnosed and under-treated. Methods These guidelines were developed by Canadian experts in anxiety and related disorders through a consensus process. Data on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment (psychological and pharmacological) were obtained through MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and manual searches (1980–2012). Treatment strategies were rated on strength of evidence, and a clinical recommendation for each intervention was made, based on global impression of efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects, using a modified version of the periodic health examination guidelines. Results These guidelines are presented in 10 sections, including an introduction, principles of diagnosis and management, six sections (Sections 3 through 8) on the specific anxiety-related disorders (panic disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder), and two additional sections on special populations (children/adolescents, pregnant/lactating women, and the elderly) and clinical issues in patients with comorbid conditions. Conclusions Anxiety and related disorders are very common in clinical practice, and frequently comorbid with other psychiatric and medical conditions. Optimal management requires a good understanding of the efficacy and side effect profiles of pharmacological and psychological treatments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                819 821-8000 , Pasquale.Roberge@USherbrooke.ca
                Catherine.Hudon@USherbrooke.ca
                alan.pavilanis@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
                Marie-Claude.Beaulieu@USherbrooke.ca
                Annie.C.Benoit@USherbrooke.ca
                helene.brouillet.cssspb16@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
                Isabelle.Boulianne@USherbrooke.ca
                anna.isbister-depauw.chsm@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
                Serge.Frigon@USherbrooke.ca
                Isabelle.Gaboury@USherbrooke.ca
                Martine.Gaudreault@USherbrooke.ca
                ariane.girard1@uqac.ca
                Marie.Giroux@USherbrooke.ca
                Elyse.Gregoire@USherbrooke.ca
                Line.Langlois@USherbrooke.ca
                Martin.Lemieux@USherbrooke.ca
                Christine.Loignon@USherbrooke.ca
                Alain.Vanasse@usherbrooke.ca
                Journal
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Family Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2296
                13 September 2016
                13 September 2016
                2016
                : 17
                : 1
                : 134
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12th Avenue North, Sherbrooke, QC Canada
                [2 ]St. Mary’s Hospital Center, 3830 Lacombe Avenue, Montreal, QC Canada
                [3 ]CISSS de la Montérégie-Est, 90 Sainte-Foy Boulevard, Longueuil, QC Canada
                [4 ]Université de Sherbrooke, UMF Chicoutimi, 305, St-Vallier, Chicoutimi, QC Canada
                [5 ]Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555, Boulevard de l’Université, Chicoutimi, QC Canada
                [6 ]Université de Sherbrooke - Campus de la santé, Groupe de recherche PRIMUS, 3001, 12e avenue nord, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4 Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-8393
                Article
                531
                10.1186/s12875-016-0531-y
                5020556
                27620166
                ac3da8af-df3c-405b-9914-ad96cc28fa32
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 18 April 2016
                : 1 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: Réseau-1 Québec (through its funding from the Fonds de recherche du Québec Santé, Pfizer, the Quebec Department of Health and Social Services, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and McGill University)
                Award ID: n/a
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Université de Sherbrookes Practice Based Research Network
                Award ID: n/a
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Fonds de recherche, dinnovation et de promotion du savoir of the Université de Sherbookes Department of Family and Emergency Medicine
                Award ID: n/a
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                anxiety disorders,major depression,chronic diseases,primary care,quality improvement,qualitative research,patient experience,treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article