+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Comparison of the Effects of Mechanical Stimulation on Venous and Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells in vitro

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The proliferation of intimal smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in large muscular arteries and veins often occurs after surgical interventions such as angioplasty and bypass grafting, and may lead to restenosis and graft failure. Clinical observations suggest that increased pulsatile deformation of veins grafted into an arterial position may play a role in intimal hyperplasia. Since intimal hyperplasia occurs at the vein/arterial interface of the graft, SMC hyperplasia could be due to the proliferation of either aortic or venous SMCs. Therefore, we compared the effects of in vitro mechanical deformation on the proliferation of aortic SMCs with venous SMCs. Using the Flexercell<sup>R</sup> apparatus (Flex-cell Corp., McKeesport, Pa., USA), aortic SMCs, stretched at 3 and 60 cpm did not lead to a significant increase in growth as compared to the non-stretched controls. In contrast, stretch of venous SMCs at 3 and 60 cpm led to a significant increase in growth as compared to the nonstretched controls. These results suggest that the SMC proliferation, as occurs in vein interposition grafts in vivo, may be partially due to a stimulatory response by venous SMCs to increased mechanical stimulation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          J Vasc Res
          Journal of Vascular Research
          S. Karger AG
          24 September 2008
          : 33
          : 5
          : 405-413
          aDepartments of Surgery and Pathology, The Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and bBoston University, Microvascular Research Laboratory, Boston, Mass., USA
          159169 J Vasc Res 1996;33:405–413
          © 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Research Paper


          Comment on this article