6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      NEO6860, modality-selective TRPV1 antagonist: a randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial in patients with osteoarthritis knee pain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          NEO6860 is a TRPV1 antagonist when activated by capsaicin but not by heat or pH, developed to relieve pain without the adverse events reported with non–modality-selective TRPV1 antagonists.

          Objective:

          The primary Objective of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of NEO6860 after 1 day oral dosing in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence stage I, II or III osteoarthritis of the knee.

          Method:

          This randomized, double-blinded, 3-period crossover, phase II study compared 1 day (2 doses) of NEO6860 (500 mg twice a day), placebo, and naproxen in 54 patients with osteoarthritis knee pain. Primary endpoint was reduction in pain intensity (PI) on Numerical Rating Scale after exercise, using the staircase test, 8 hours after dose.

          Results:

          Level of PI, compared with baseline, was numerically lower during NEO6860 and naproxen periods vs placebo at 3 and 24 hours, but not at 8 hours after first dose. A statistically significant effect for naproxen and a trend for NEO6860 were observed at 3 and 24 hours. Least square means' (95% confidence interval) change in PI at 24 hours was −0.67 (−1.09 to −0.26), −0.97 (−1.39 to −0.55), −0.29 (−0.71 to 0.13) for NEO6860, naproxen, and placebo, respectively. NEO6860 exposure was ∼1.6 times higher compared with previous phase I. In this study, NEO6860 safety profile was less favorable than naproxen or placebo. Possibly NEO6860-related adverse events included: feel hot, headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, hypoaesthesia, and increased blood pressure.

          Conclusion:

          In this exploratory study, NEO6860 did not statistically significantly outperform placebo but showed an analgesic trend, without impacting body temperature and heat pain perception. Further studies are warranted to explore the potential of NEO6860 in other pain indications. We intent to optimize the dose and evaluate analgesic synergism with other mechanism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.

          Most clinicians ask their patients to rate whether their health condition has improved or deteriorated over time and then use this information to guide management decisions. Many studies also use patient-rated change as an outcome measure to determine the efficacy of a particular treatment. Global rating of change (GRC) scales provide a method of obtaining this information in a manner that is quick, flexible, and efficient. As with any outcome measure, however, meaningful interpretation of results can only be undertaken with due consideration of the clinimetric properties, strengths, and weaknesses of the instrument. The purpose of this article is to summarize this information to assist appropriate interpretation of the GRC results and to provide evidence-informed advice to guide design and administration of GRC scales. These considerations are relevant and applicable to the use of GRC scales both in the clinic and in research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pharmacological blockade of the vanilloid receptor TRPV1 elicits marked hyperthermia in humans.

            The vanilloid receptor TRPV1 has been identified as a molecular target for the treatment of pain associated with inflammatory diseases and cancer. Hence, TRPV1 antagonists have been considered for therapeutic evaluation in such diseases. During Phase I clinical trials with AMG 517, a highly selective TRPV1 antagonist, we found that TRPV1 blockade elicited marked, but reversible, and generally plasma concentration-dependent hyperthermia. Similar to what was observed in rats, dogs, and monkeys, hyperthermia was attenuated after repeated dosing of AMG 517 (at the highest dose tested) in humans during a second Phase I trial. However, AMG 517 administered after molar extraction (a surgical cause of acute pain) elicited long-lasting hyperthermia with maximal body temperature surpassing 40 degrees C, suggesting that TRPV1 blockade elicits undesirable hyperthermia in susceptible individuals. Mechanisms of AMG 517-induced hyperthermia were then studied in rats. AMG 517 caused hyperthermia by inducing tail skin vasoconstriction and increasing thermogenesis, which suggests that TRPV1 regulates vasomotor tone and metabolic heat production. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that: (a) TRPV1-selective antagonists like AMG 517 cannot be developed for systemic use as stand alone agents for treatment of pain and other diseases, (b) individual susceptibility influences magnitude of hyperthermia observed after TRPV1 blockade, and (c) TRPV1 plays a pivotal role as a molecular regulator for body temperature in humans.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An efficient randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with the irreversible fatty acid amide hydrolase-1 inhibitor PF-04457845, which modulates endocannabinoids but fails to induce effective analgesia in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee.

              The effect of PF-04457845, a potent and selective fatty acid amide hydrolase-1 (FAAH1) inhibitor, on pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee was investigated in a randomised placebo and active-controlled clinical trial. The trial involved 2 periods (separated by a 2-week washout) consisting of a 1-week wash-in phase followed by 2weeks double-blind treatment. Patients received single-blind placebo throughout the wash-in and washout periods. Patients were randomised to receive either 4mg q.d. PF-04457845 followed by placebo (or vice versa), or 500mg b.i.d. naproxen followed by placebo (or vice versa). The primary end point was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score. The trial had predefined decision rules based on likelihood that PF-04457845 was better or worse than the standard of care (considered to be a 1.8 reduction in WOMAC pain score compared to placebo). A total of 74 patients were randomised to 1 of 4 treatment sequences. The mean differences (80% confidence intervals) from placebo in WOMAC pain score were 0.04 (-0.63 to 0.71) for PF-04457845 and -1.13 (-1.79 to -0.47) for naproxen, indicating that whilst naproxen seemed efficacious, PF-04457845 was not differentiated from placebo. The study was stopped at the interim analysis for futility. PF-04457845 decreased FAAH activity by >96% and substantially increased 4 endogenous substrates (fatty acid amides). PF-04457845 was well tolerated in osteoarthritis patients, and there was no evidence of cannabinoid-type adverse events. The lack of analgesic effect of FAAH1 inhibition in humans is in contrast to data from animal models. This apparent disconnect between species needs further study. Copyright © 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pain Rep
                Pain Rep
                PAIREP
                Painreports
                Pain Reports
                Wolters Kluwer (Philadelphia, PA )
                2471-2531
                26 October 2018
                November 2018
                : 3
                : 6
                : e696
                Affiliations
                [a ]Diex Recherche Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
                [b ]NEOMED Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
                [c ]Consultant Exploratory Medicines, Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [d ]Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
                [e ]LLC, Chadds Ford, PA, USA
                [f ]Analgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA
                [g ]Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Address: NEOMED Institute, 7171 Frederick-Banting, Montreal, QC H4S 1Z9, Canada. Tel.: 514 575 6958. E-mail address: dchiche@ 123456neomed.ca (D.A. Chiche).
                Article
                PAINREPORTS-D-18-0052 00004
                10.1097/PR9.0000000000000696
                6344137
                30706039
                ac7a782c-a590-4a69-98a6-36a5efd66d00
                Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 June 2018
                : 14 August 2018
                : 19 September 2018
                Categories
                5
                Musculoskeletal
                Research Paper
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                neo6860,trpv1 antagonist,osteoarthritis of the knee,analgesic effect,hyperthermia,change in heat pain perception,staircase test

                Comments

                Comment on this article