+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Intraindividual Comparison of Diltiazem and Verapamil on Induction of Paroxysmal Supraventncular Tachycardia

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The effects of i.v. diltiazem (0.25 mg/kg) and i.v. verapamil (0.15 mg/kg) were studied in 18 patients with recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) who underwent serial electrophysiological studies. In 10 of 18 patients with extranodal accessory pathways the effects of diltiazem and verapamil were similar in comparable plasma concentrations. SVT was prevented in 10/10 cases after diltiazem and 9/10 cases after verapamil, furthermore there as an increase in antegrade refractoriness of the normal AV nodal pathway of 22 and 27%, respectively; accessory pathway refractoriness and conduction remained unchanged in both drugs. In 8 of 18 patients with dual AV nodal pathways diltiazem was significantly less effective as compared to verapamil (p < 0.02) regarding prevention ov SVT (3/8 vs. 8/8 cases) and increase in the antegrade refractoriness of the slow AV nodal pathway (+21 vs. +34%). However, both drugs produced equivalent slowing of antegrade AV nodal conduction and a similar increase in antegrade refractoriness of the fast AV nodal pathway. In all 18 patients, the site of action of both drugs was the antegrade limb, regardless of SVT mechanism. The data suggest that the two calcium antagonists are equipotent in AV reentrance but verapamil may offer greater benefit in AV nodal reentrance than diltiazem.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          18 November 2008
          : 85
          : 6
          : 388-396
          aDepartment of Cardiology of the University of Athens, Greece; bDepartment of Cardiology, State Hospital at Ludwigshafen, Germany
          176740 Cardiology 1994;85:388–396
          © 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Arrhythmias, Electrophysiology and Electrocardiography


          Comment on this article