18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Explaining the obesity paradox: The association between body composition and colorectal cancer survival (C-SCANS study)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Body composition may partially explain the U-shaped association between BMI and colorectal cancer (CRC) survival.

          Methods

          Muscle and adiposity at CRC diagnosis and survival were examined in a retrospective cohort using Kaplan Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression, and restricted cubic splines in 3,262 early stage (I-III) male (50%) and female (50%) patients. Sarcopenia was defined using optimal stratification and sex- and BMI-specific cut points. High adiposity was defined as the highest tertile of sex-specific total adipose tissue (TAT). Primary outcomes were overall mortality (OM) and CRC specific mortality (CRCsM).

          Results

          Forty-two percent of patients were sarcopenic. During 6.0 years of follow-up, 788 deaths occurred, including 433 from CRC. Sarcopenic patients had a 27% (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.09, 1.48) higher risk of OM, than those who were not sarcopenic. Females with both low muscle and high adiposity had a 64% higher risk of OM (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.05, 2.57) when compared to females with adequate muscle and lower adiposity. The lowest risk of OM was seen in patients with a BMI between 25-<30-kg/m 2, a range associated with the greatest number of patients (58.6%) who were not at increased risk of OM due to either low muscle or high adiposity.

          Conclusions

          Sarcopenia is prevalent among non-metastatic CRC patients, and should, along with adiposity be a standard oncological marker.

          Impact

          Our findings suggest a biological explanation for the obesity paradox in CRC and refute the notion that the association between overweight and lower mortality is due solely to methodological biases.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          9200608
          2299
          Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
          Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
          Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology
          1055-9965
          1538-7755
          14 April 2017
          15 May 2017
          July 2017
          01 July 2018
          : 26
          : 7
          : 1008-1015
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, California 94612 United States
          [2 ]Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, Massachusetts 02215 United States
          [3 ]Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Sciences, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P5 Canada
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Bette Caan, Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, Bette.caan@ 123456kp.org , Ph: 510-891-3719; Fax: 510-891-3836
          Article
          PMC5647152 PMC5647152 5647152 nihpa861279
          10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0200
          5647152
          28506965
          ac9285c6-6c4d-4fcf-ac18-be34dafd2d1c
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article