0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Implementing and evaluating shared decision making in oncology practice.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Engaging individuals with cancer in decision making about their treatments has received increased attention; shared decision making (SDM) has become a hallmark of patient-centered care. Although physicians indicate substantial interest in SDM, implementing SDM in cancer care is often complex; high levels of uncertainty may exist, and health care providers must help patients understand the potential risks versus benefits of different treatment options. However, patients who are more engaged in their health care decision making are more likely to experience confidence in and satisfaction with treatment decisions and increased trust in their providers. To implement SDM in oncology practice, physicians and other health care providers need to understand the components of SDM and the approaches to supporting and facilitating this process as part of cancer care. This review summarizes recent information regarding patient and physician factors that influence SDM for cancer care, outcomes resulting from successful SDM, and strategies for implementing SDM in oncology practice. We present a conceptual model illustrating the components of SDM in cancer care and provide recommendations for facilitating SDM in oncology practice.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CA Cancer J Clin
          CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
          American Cancer Society
          1542-4863
          0007-9235
          September 10 2014
          : 64
          : 6
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Health Services Analyst, Primary Prevention Research and Evaluation Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
          Article
          10.3322/caac.21245
          25200391
          ac94b40c-ffee-451a-86eb-c94539cb1b10
          History

          clinical,decision making,health personnel attitudes,health services research,neoplasms/therapy,oncology,patient preference,shared

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log