12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cross-cultural adaptation of the Clear Communication Index to Brazilian Portuguese

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          OBJECTIVE

          To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Clear Communication Index instrument from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-CCI) from English to Brazilian Portuguese.

          METHODS

          This study comprised initial discussion about the conceptual equivalence of the instrument by a committee formed by experts on health education. We performed translations, synthesis of translations, back-translations, revision by the committee, and linguistic revision. Semantic equivalence was obtained by analyzing the referential and general meaning of each item by the committee, resulting in a pre-final version of the instrument. Subsequently, thirty professionals with health sciences degrees performed a pre-test. These professionals used the pre-final version of the instrument to assess a health education material. A questionnaire was applied to evaluate the acceptability of the instrument, the understanding of each of the 20 items, as well as the individual and professional variables. We analyzed the scores attributed to the health education material, the variables related to healthcare professionals, the proportions of the acceptability of the instrument, and the comprehension of each item.

          RESULTS

          After we obtained the conceptual equivalence of the instrument, the committee of experts, the instrument’s main author, and the linguist produced the pre-final version using two translations, a synthesis of the translations, and two back-translations. A general equivalence was maintained in 15 of the 20 items (75%), four of the items were slightly altered (20%), and one item was very altered (5%). Nineteen items presented referential equivalence or near equivalence (95%). We then carried out with the pre-test, in which the professionals used the pre-final version. Two items in the domains of “risks” and “main message” were unclear and needed to be revised.

          CONCLUSION

          The process of cross-cultural adaptation of the Clear Communication Index provided an adapted version to the Brazilian Portuguese language.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The CDC Clear Communication Index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information.

          This article presents the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (the Index), a tool that emphasizes the primary audience's needs and provides a set of evidence-based criteria to develop and assess public communication products for diverse audiences. The Index consists of four open-ended introductory questions and 20 scored items that affect information clarity and audience comprehension, according to the scientific literature. A research team fielded an online survey to test the Index's validity. Respondents answered 10 questions about either an original health material or one redesigned with the Index. For 9 out of 10 questions, the materials revised using the Index were rated higher than the original materials. Regardless of education level, respondents rated the revised materials more favorably than the original ones. The results indicate that the Index performed as intended and made it more likely that audiences could correctly identify the intended main message and understand the words and numbers in the materials. The results also support the widely held view that audiences are more positive about clearly designed materials. The Index shows that an evidence-based scoring rubric can assess and improve the clarity of health materials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The evolving concept ofHealth literacy: New directions for health literacy studies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health Literacy INDEX: development, reliability, and validity of a new tool for evaluating the health literacy demands of health information materials.

              There is no consensus on how best to assess the health literacy demands of health information materials. Comprehensive, reliable, and valid assessment tools are needed. The authors report on the development, refinement, and testing of Health Literacy INDEX, a new tool reflecting empirical evidence and best practices. INDEX is comprised of 63 indicators organized into 10 criteria: plain language, clear purpose, supporting graphics, user involvement, skill-based learning, audience appropriateness, user instruction, development details, evaluation methods, and strength of evidence. In a sample of 100 materials, intercoder agreement was high: 90% or better for 52% of indicators, and above 80% for nearly all others. Overall scores generated by INDEX were highly correlated with average ratings from 12 health literacy experts (r = 0.89, p < .0001). Additional research is warranted to examine the association between evaluation ratings generated by INDEX and individual understanding, behaviors, and improved health. Health Literacy INDEX is a comprehensive tool with evidence for reliability and validity that can be used to evaluate the health literacy demands of health information materials. Although improvement in health information materials is just one aspect of mitigating the effects of limited health literacy on health outcomes, it is an essential step toward a more health literate public.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Rev Saude Publica
                Rev Saude Publica
                rsp
                Revista de Saúde Pública
                Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
                0034-8910
                1518-8787
                09 March 2020
                2020
                : 54
                : 26
                Affiliations
                [I ]orgnameUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais orgdiv1Faculdade de Odontologia orgdiv2Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia Belo Horizonte MGBrasiloriginal Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais . Faculdade de Odontologia . Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia . Belo Horizonte , MG , Brasil
                [II ]orgnameUniversity of Maryland orgdiv1School of Public Health orgdiv2Herschel S. Horowitz Center for Health Literacy MarylandEUAoriginal University of Maryland . School of Public Health . Herschel S. Horowitz Center for Health Literacy . College Park, Maryland , EUA
                [III ]orgnameUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais orgdiv1Faculdade de Odontologia orgdiv2Departamento de Saúde Bucal da Infância e Adolescência Belo Horizonte MGBrasiloriginal Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais . Faculdade de Odontologia . Departamento de Saúde Bucal da Infância e Adolescência . Belo Horizonte , MG , Brasil
                [IV ]orgnameUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais orgdiv1Faculdade de Odontologia orgdiv2Departamento de Odontologia Social e Preventiva Belo Horizonte MGBrasiloriginal Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais . Faculdade de Odontologia . Departamento de Odontologia Social e Preventiva . Belo Horizonte , MG , Brasil
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Fernanda Morais Ferreira Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627 – Pampulha. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. CEP 31270.901. E-mail: femoraisfe@ 123456gmail.com

                Authors’ contributions: AMCLM performed the literature review, collected data and organized data bank and statistical analysis. CB and FMF collaborated in the conception, study planning and analysis. ACBO and MHNGA conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors helped drafting and reading the manuscript and approved its final version.

                Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-0223
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-7046
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-1167
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-4024
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-5725
                Article
                00223
                10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001561
                7063860
                ac990848-81e3-41b6-b490-bea45420506f

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 03 March 2019
                : 09 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 25
                Funding
                Funded by: CAPES
                Award ID: 001
                Funded by: CNPq
                Award ID: 307617 / 2015-7
                Funding: This study was partially funded by CAPES (process 001), CNPq (307617 / 2015-7).
                Categories
                Original Article

                health communication,health education,translations,validation studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content147

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors327