39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neovascular glaucoma: a review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a secondary glaucoma generally associated with poor visual prognosis. The development of new vessels over the iris and the iridocorneal angle can obstruct aqueous humor outflow and lead to increased intraocular pressure. The underlying pathogenesis in most cases is posterior segment ischemia, which is most commonly secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy or central vein retinal occlusion. The neovascularization process in the eye is driven by the events that alter the homeostatic balance between pro-angiogenic factors, such as the vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-angiogenic factors, such as the pigment-epithelium-derived factor. Early diagnosis of this condition through slit lamp examination of the iris, iridocorneal angle and retina can help to avoid the development of goniosynechia and obstruction of aqueous humor outflow, with consequent intraocular pressure elevation. Historically, NVG treatment was focused on reducing the posterior segment ischemic process that caused the formation of new vessels, through panretinal photocoagulation. Recently, several studies have investigated the application of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies in NVG. If clinical treatment with the use of hypotensive topical drops is not sufficient, laser and/or surgical procedures are required for intraocular pressure control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Natural history of visual outcome in central retinal vein occlusion.

          To investigate systematically the natural history of visual outcome in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Cohort study. Six hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients (30 patients had both eyes involved resulting in 697 eyes) with CRVO first seen in the authors' clinic from 1973 through 2000. At the first visit, all patients underwent a detailed ophthalmic and medical history and a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation. Visual evaluation was carried out by recording visual acuity, using the Snellen visual acuity chart, and assessing visual fields with a Goldmann perimeter. The same ophthalmic evaluation was performed at each follow-up visit. Central retinal vein occlusion was classified into nonischemic (588 eyes) and ischemic (109 eyes) types at the initial visit based on functional and morphologic criteria. Visual acuity and visual fields. Of the eyes first seen within 3 months, visual acuity was 20/100 or better in 78% with nonischemic CRVO and in only 1% with ischemic CRVO (P < 0.0001), and visual field defects were minimal or mild in 91% and 8%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Final visual acuity, on resolution of macular edema, was 20/100 or better in 83% with nonischemic CRVO and in only 12% with ischemic CRVO (P < 0.0001), and visual field defects were minimal or mild in 95% and 18%, respectively (P < 0.0001). On resolution of macular edema, in eyes with initial visual acuity of 20/70 or worse, visual acuity improved in 59% with nonischemic CRVO, with no significant (P = 0.55) improvement in ischemic CRVO. Similarly, on resolution of macular edema, in eyes with moderate to severe initial visual field defect, improvement was seen in 86% of nonischemic CRVO eyes, but no significant (P = 0.83) improvement was seen in eyes with ischemic CRVO. In nonischemic CRVO, development of foveal pigmentary degeneration, epiretinal membrane, or both, was the main cause of poor final visual acuity. This shows that initial presentation and the final visual outcome in the 2 types of CRVO are entirely different. A clear differentiation of CRVO into nonischemic and ischemic types, based primarily on functional criteria, is crucial and fundamental in determining visual outcome. Visual outcome is good in nonischemic CRVO and poor in ischemic CRVO. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma.

            To succinctly update information on the pathogenesis, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neovascular glaucoma based on a systematic review of available literature and to provide summary recommendations rated for their importance to clinical outcome. Neovascular glaucoma is a devastating ocular disease that often results in loss of vision. The current standard of care includes retinal ablation and control of increased intraocular pressure with medical and surgical therapy. LITERATURE REVIEW METHODOLOGY: The authors conducted a MEDLINE literature search of articles published in English from 1966 to the present. Each article reviewed was rated as to the strength of evidence it provided, and summary ratings for the strength of evidence supporting clinical recommendations were generated. Level A (most important to patient outcome) recommendations for the diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma include a high index of suspicion, a full ocular examination including undilated gonioscopy, and pupil examination. In regard to treatment, Level A recommendations include treatment of the underlying disease origin, complete panretinal photocoagulation (if retinal ischemia is a factor), and medical control of both elevated intraocular pressure and inflammation. Level B recommendations (moderately important to patient outcome) encompass glaucoma surgery to control intraocular pressure when medical therapy is unsuccessful, although the ideal surgical procedure is unknown. Currently, trabeculectomy with antimetabolite therapy, aqueous shunt implants, and diode laser cyclophotocoagulation are the preferred surgical treatment options. The current literature on neovascular glaucoma has few articles that provide strong evidence in support of therapy recommendations (level I). Future research studies are needed to address areas in which the current evidence is moderately strong (level II) or weak, consisting only of a consensus of expert opinion (level III). Whenever practicable, these studies should be prospective, randomized clinical trials.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neovascular glaucoma.

              Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a severely blinding, intractable disease. The objective of this review is to provide detailed information on its basic and clinical aspects, to enable us to manage it logically. Therefore, its causes, pathogenesis and pathology, methods of early diagnosis and management are discussed. To prevent or reduce the extent of visual loss caused by NVG, the first essential is to have a high index of suspicion of its development. The most common diseases responsible for development of NVG are ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), diabetic retinopathy and ocular ischemic syndrome. In the management strategy, the first priority should be to try to prevent its development by appropriate management of the causative diseases. If NVG develops, early diagnosis is crucial to reduce the extent of visual loss. Management of NVG primarily consists of controlling the high IOP by medical and/or surgical means to minimize the visual loss. Currently, we still do not have a satisfactory means of treating NVG and preventing visual loss in the majority, in spite of multiple modes of medical and surgical options advocated over the years and claims made. This review discusses the pros and cons for the various advocated treatments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +55-19-35217380 , gustavobrodrigues@yahoo.com.br
                ricardoabe85@yahoo.com.br
                czangalli@gmail.com
                saviosdre@yahoo.com.br
                fladonini@hotmail.com
                danilooftalmo@gmail.com
                andreleitesilva@gmail.com
                joaopaulofelix@hotmail.com
                marcelotorigoe@hotmail.com
                adinizfilho@gmail.com
                homero@iobh.com.br
                Journal
                Int J Retina Vitreous
                Int J Retina Vitreous
                International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
                BioMed Central (London )
                2056-9920
                14 November 2016
                14 November 2016
                2016
                : 2
                : 26
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas - UNICAMP, University of Campinas, Caixa Postal - 6111, Campinas, SP 13083-970 Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-6822
                Article
                51
                10.1186/s40942-016-0051-x
                5116372
                27895936
                ac9d75a6-a39d-481e-ade7-818db0992a57
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 8 October 2015
                : 5 October 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006416, Universidade Estadual de Campinas;
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                neovascular glaucoma,refractory,anti-vegf,diabetes,central retinal vein occlusion

                Comments

                Comment on this article