8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Intravascular-catheter-related infections are frequent life-threatening events in health care, but incidence can be decreased by improvements in the quality of care. Optimisation of skin antisepsis is essential to prevent short-term catheter-related infections. We hypothesised that chlorhexidine-alcohol would be more effective than povidone iodine-alcohol as a skin antiseptic to prevent intravascular-catheter-related infections.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Lancet
          Lancet (London, England)
          1474-547X
          0140-6736
          Nov 21 2015
          : 386
          : 10008
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Service d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Université de Poitiers, UFR de Médecine Pharmacie, Poitiers, France; INSERM U1070, Pharmacologie des Agents antiInfectieux, Poitiers, France. Electronic address: olivier.mimoz@chu-poitiers.fr.
          [2 ] AP-HP, Bichat University Hospital, Infection Control Unit, Paris, France; INSERM, UMR 1137-IAME Team 5-DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Control and Care, Paris, France; Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
          [3 ] Service d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
          [4 ] Service de Réanimation Adultes et Unité de Surveillance Continue, CHU Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France.
          [5 ] Service de Réanimation médicale, CHU Clermont Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
          [6 ] Service de Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
          [7 ] Département de Réanimation Médicale et Médecine Hyperbare, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
          [8 ] INSERM, UMR 1137-IAME Team 5-DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Control and Care, Paris, France; University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
          [9 ] Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
          [10 ] Service de Réanimation et Maladies infectieuses, CH de Tourcoing, Tourcoing, France.
          [11 ] Service d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation Médicale et Chirurgicale, CHU Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
          [12 ] Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, Paris, France.
          [13 ] OutcomeRéa, Paris, France.
          Article
          S0140-6736(15)00244-5
          10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00244-5
          26388532
          acb62b9a-0b28-4350-9920-1923010a9438
          Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_

          Similar content225

          Cited by82