6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A model for rapid PM 2.5 exposure estimates in wildfire conditions using routinely available data: rapidfire v0.1.3

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3
      Geoscientific model development

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urban smoke exposure events from large wildfires have become increasingly common in California and throughout the western United States. The ability to study the impacts of high smoke aerosol exposures from these events on the public is limited by the availability of high-quality, spatially resolved estimates of aerosol concentrations. Methods for assigning aerosol exposure often employ multiple data sets that are time-consuming to create and difficult to reproduce. As these events have gone from occasional to nearly annual in frequency, the need for rapid smoke exposure assessments has increased. The rapidfire (relatively accurate particulate information derived from inputs retrieved easily) R package (version 0.1.3) provides a suite of tools for developing exposure assignments using data sets that are routinely generated and publicly available within a month of the event. Specifically, rapidfire harvests official air quality monitoring, satellite observations, meteorological modeling, operational predictive smoke modeling, and low-cost sensor networks. A machine learning approach, random forest (RF) regression, is used to fuse the different data sets. Using rapidfire, we produced estimates of ground-level 24 h average particulate matter for several large wildfire smoke events in California from 2017–2021. These estimates show excellent agreement with independent measures from filter-based networks.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Random Forests

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

            Understanding why a model makes a certain prediction can be as crucial as the prediction's accuracy in many applications. However, the highest accuracy for large modern datasets is often achieved by complex models that even experts struggle to interpret, such as ensemble or deep learning models, creating a tension between accuracy and interpretability. In response, various methods have recently been proposed to help users interpret the predictions of complex models, but it is often unclear how these methods are related and when one method is preferable over another. To address this problem, we present a unified framework for interpreting predictions, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). SHAP assigns each feature an importance value for a particular prediction. Its novel components include: (1) the identification of a new class of additive feature importance measures, and (2) theoretical results showing there is a unique solution in this class with a set of desirable properties. The new class unifies six existing methods, notable because several recent methods in the class lack the proposed desirable properties. Based on insights from this unification, we present new methods that show improved computational performance and/or better consistency with human intuition than previous approaches. To appear in NIPS 2017
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101723833
                47423
                Geosci Model Dev
                Geosci Model Dev
                Geoscientific model development
                1991-959X
                1991-9603
                5 April 2024
                2024
                16 January 2024
                11 October 2024
                : 17
                : 1
                : 381-397
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Air Quality Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
                [2 ]Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Seattle, WA, United States
                [3 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, United States
                Author notes

                Author contributions. SR wrote the rapidfire package, performed analysis, and wrote the manuscript. SO’N provided BlueSky data, contributed text and editing to the manuscript, and advised throughout. RS led the studies that used rapidfire and contributed text to the manuscript.

                Correspondence: Sean Raffuse ( sraffuse@ 123456ucdavis.edu )
                Article
                NIHMS1982722
                10.5194/gmd-17-381-2024
                11469206
                39398326
                acb8fad2-165c-4724-88a1-9fbb091806ab

                This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log