68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk of poor development in young children in low-income and middle-income countries: an estimation and analysis at the global, regional, and country level

      research-article
      , ,
      The Lancet. Global health

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          A 2007 study published in The Lancet estimated that approximately 219 million children aged younger than 5 years were exposed to stunting or extreme poverty in 2004. We updated the 2004 estimates with the use of improved data and methods and generated estimates for 2010.

          Methods

          We used country-level prevalence of stunting in children younger than 5 years based on the 2006 Growth Standards proposed by WHO and poverty ratios from the World Bank to estimate children who were either stunted or lived in extreme poverty for 141 low-income and middle-income countries in 2004 and 2010. To avoid counting the same children twice, we excluded children jointly exposed to stunting and extreme poverty from children living in extreme poverty. To examine the robustness of estimates, we also used moderate poverty measures.

          Findings

          The 2007 study underestimated children at risk of poor development. The estimated number of children exposed to the two risk factors in low-income and middle-income countries decreased from 279·1 million (95% CI 250·4 million–307·4 million) in 2004 to 249·4 million (209·3 million–292·6 million) in 2010; prevalence of children at risk fell from 51% (95% CI 46–56) to 43% (36–51). The decline occurred in all income groups and regions with south Asia experiencing the largest drop. Sub-Saharan Africa had the highest prevalence in both years. These findings were robust to variations in poverty measures.

          Interpretation

          Progress has been made in reducing the number of children exposed to stunting or poverty between 2004 and 2010, but this is still not enough. Scaling up of effective interventions targeting the most vulnerable children is urgently needed.

          Funding

          National Institutes of Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Hilton Foundation, and WHO.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost?

          The Lancet, 382(9890), 452-477
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cumulative risk and child development.

            Childhood multiple risk factor exposure exceeds the adverse developmental impacts of singular exposures. Multiple risk factor exposure may also explain why sociodemographic variables (e.g., poverty) can have adverse consequences. Most research on multiple risk factor exposure has relied upon cumulative risk (CR) as the measure of multiple risk. CR is constructed by dichotomizing each risk factor exposure (0 = no risk; 1 = risk) and then summing the dichotomous scores. Despite its widespread use in developmental psychology and elsewhere, CR has several shortcomings: Risk is designated arbitrarily; data on risk intensity are lost; and the index is additive, precluding the possibility of statistical interactions between risk factors. On the other hand, theoretically more compelling multiple risk metrics prove untenable because of low statistical power, extreme higher order interaction terms, low robustness, and collinearity among risk factors. CR multiple risk metrics are parsimonious, are statistically sensitive even with small samples, and make no assumptions about the relative strengths of multiple risk factors or their collinearity. CR also fits well with underlying theoretical models (e.g., Bronfenbrenner's, 1979, bioecological model; McEwen's, 1998, allostasis model of chronic stress; and Ellis, Figueredo, Brumbach, & Schlomer's, 2009, developmental evolutionary theory) concerning why multiple risk factor exposure is more harmful than singular risk exposure. We review the child CR literature, comparing CR to alternative multiple risk measurement models. We also discuss strengths and weaknesses of developmental CR research, offering analytic and theoretical suggestions to strengthen this growing area of scholarship. Finally, we highlight intervention and policy implications of CR and child development research and theory. © 2013 American Psychological Association
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Labor market returns to an early childhood stimulation intervention in Jamaica.

              A substantial literature shows that U.S. early childhood interventions have important long-term economic benefits. However, there is little evidence on this question for developing countries. We report substantial effects on the earnings of participants in a randomized intervention conducted in 1986-1987 that gave psychosocial stimulation to growth-stunted Jamaican toddlers. The intervention consisted of weekly visits from community health workers over a 2-year period that taught parenting skills and encouraged mothers and children to interact in ways that develop cognitive and socioemotional skills. The authors reinterviewed 105 out of 129 study participants 20 years later and found that the intervention increased earnings by 25%, enough for them to catch up to the earnings of a nonstunted comparison group identified at baseline (65 out of 84 participants).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101613665
                42402
                Lancet Glob Health
                Lancet Glob Health
                The Lancet. Global health
                2214-109X
                20 March 2018
                04 October 2016
                December 2016
                03 April 2018
                : 4
                : 12
                : e916-e922
                Affiliations
                Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA (C Lu PhD); Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA (Prof M M Black PhD); RTI International, Research Park, NC, USA (Prof M M Black PhD); and DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (Prof L M Richter PhD)
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Chunling Lu, Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA chunling_lu@ 123456hms.harvard.edu
                Article
                NIHMS952171
                10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30266-2
                5881401
                27717632
                ace673ff-9788-4629-a967-05276eeb7ef2

                This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article