10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CRISPR/Cas9-based editing of a sensitive transcriptional regulatory element to achieve cell type-specific knockdown of the NEMO scaffold protein

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of alternative promoters for the cell type-specific expression of a given mRNA/protein is a common cell strategy. NEMO is a scaffold protein required for canonical NF-κB signaling. Transcription of the NEMO gene is primarily controlled by two promoters: one (promoter B) drives NEMO transcription in most cell types and the second (promoter D) is largely responsible for NEMO transcription in liver cells. Herein, we have used a CRISPR/Cas9-based approach to disrupt a core sequence element of promoter B, and this genetic editing essentially eliminates expression of NEMO mRNA and protein in 293T human kidney cells. By cell subcloning, we have isolated targeted 293T cell lines that express no detectable NEMO protein, have defined genomic alterations at promoter B, and do not support activation of canonical NF-κB signaling in response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor. Nevertheless, non-canonical NF-κB signaling is intact in these NEMO-deficient cells. Expression of ectopic wild-type NEMO, but not certain human NEMO disease mutants, in the edited cells restores downstream NF-κB signaling in response to tumor necrosis factor. Targeting of the promoter B element does not substantially reduce NEMO expression (from promoter D) in the human SNU-423 liver cancer cell line. Thus, we have created a strategy for selectively eliminating cell type-specific expression from an alternative promoter and have generated 293T cell lines with a functional knockout of NEMO. The implications of these findings for further studies and for therapeutic approaches to target canonical NF-κB signaling are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Non-canonical NF-κB signaling pathway.

          The non-canonical NF-κB pathway is an important arm of NF-κB signaling that predominantly targets activation of the p52/RelB NF-κB complex. This pathway depends on the inducible processing of p100, a molecule functioning as both the precursor of p52 and a RelB-specific inhibitor. A central signaling component of the non-canonical pathway is NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK), which integrates signals from a subset of TNF receptor family members and activates a downstream kinase, IκB kinase-α (IKKα), for triggering p100 phosphorylation and processing. A unique mechanism of NIK regulation is through its fate control: the basal level of NIK is kept low by a TRAF-cIAP destruction complex and signal-induced non-canonical NF-κB signaling involves NIK stabilization. Tight control of the fate of NIK is important, since deregulated NIK accumulation is associated with lymphoid malignancies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alternative pre-mRNA splicing regulation in cancer: pathways and programs unhinged.

            Alternative splicing of mRNA precursors is a nearly ubiquitous and extremely flexible point of gene control in humans. It provides cells with the opportunity to create protein isoforms of differing, even opposing, functions from a single gene. Cancer cells often take advantage of this flexibility to produce proteins that promote growth and survival. Many of the isoforms produced in this manner are developmentally regulated and are preferentially re-expressed in tumors. Emerging insights into this process indicate that pathways that are frequently deregulated in cancer often play important roles in promoting aberrant splicing, which in turn contributes to all aspects of tumor biology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A genomic view of alternative splicing.

              Recent genome-wide analyses of alternative splicing indicate that 40-60% of human genes have alternative splice forms, suggesting that alternative splicing is one of the most significant components of the functional complexity of the human genome. Here we review these recent results from bioinformatics studies, assess their reliability and consider the impact of alternative splicing on biological functions. Although the 'big picture' of alternative splicing that is emerging from genomics is exciting, there are many challenges. High-throughput experimental verification of alternative splice forms, functional characterization, and regulation of alternative splicing are key directions for research. We recommend a community-based effort to discover and characterize alternative splice forms comprehensively throughout the human genome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                25 September 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 9
                : e0222588
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
                [2 ] Department of Oncology, McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
                Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-768X
                Article
                PONE-D-19-03328
                10.1371/journal.pone.0222588
                6760803
                31553754
                acfc613b-e911-440c-a7a9-2e71bc5b2620
                © 2019 Babaei et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 3 February 2019
                : 2 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (US)
                Award ID: CA077474
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000009, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: GM117350
                Award Recipient :
                This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health ( www.nih.gov) grants CA077474 (to S.M.) and GM117350 (to T.D.G.). M.B., Y.L., L.K, and E.Z.M. were supported by funds from the Boston University Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program ( www.bu.edu/urop). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Cloning
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Cloning
                Research and analysis methods
                Biological cultures
                Cell lines
                293T cells
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                RNA
                Guide RNA
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Specimen Preparation and Treatment
                Mechanical Treatment of Specimens
                Specimen Disruption
                Cell Disruption
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                DNA transcription
                Biology and life sciences
                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology techniques
                Cloning
                DNA cloning
                Research and analysis methods
                Molecular biology techniques
                Cloning
                DNA cloning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Post-Translational Modification
                Phosphorylation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Molecular Biology Assays and Analysis Techniques
                Gene Expression and Vector Techniques
                Protein Expression
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Molecular Biology Assays and Analysis Techniques
                Gene Expression and Vector Techniques
                Protein Expression
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article