38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Precisely measuring the location and frequency of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) along the genome is instrumental to understanding genomic fragility, but current methods are limited in versatility, sensitivity or practicality. Here we present Breaks Labeling In Situ and Sequencing (BLISS), featuring the following: (1) direct labelling of DSBs in fixed cells or tissue sections on a solid surface; (2) low-input requirement by linear amplification of tagged DSBs by in vitro transcription; (3) quantification of DSBs through unique molecular identifiers; and (4) easy scalability and multiplexing. We apply BLISS to profile endogenous and exogenous DSBs in low-input samples of cancer cells, embryonic stem cells and liver tissue. We demonstrate the sensitivity of BLISS by assessing the genome-wide off-target activity of two CRISPR-associated RNA-guided endonucleases, Cas9 and Cpf1, observing that Cpf1 has higher specificity than Cas9. Our results establish BLISS as a versatile, sensitive and efficient method for genome-wide DSB mapping in many applications.

          Abstract

          Double-strand breaks are a major DNA lesion that can occur by endogenous and exogenous processes. Here the authors present BLISS—Breaks Labelling In Situ and Sequencing—to map breaks across the genome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells.

          Programmable clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) Cpf1 endonucleases are single-RNA-guided (crRNA) enzymes that recognize thymidine-rich protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequences and produce cohesive double-stranded breaks (DSBs). Genome editing with CRISPR-Cpf1 endonucleases could provide an alternative to CRISPR-Cas9 endonucleases, but the determinants of targeting specificity are not well understood. Using mismatched crRNAs we found that Cpf1 could tolerate single or double mismatches in the 3' PAM-distal region, but not in the 5' PAM-proximal region. Genome-wide analysis of cleavage sites in vitro for eight Cpf1 nucleases using Digenome-seq revealed that there were 6 (LbCpf1) and 12 (AsCpf1) cleavage sites per crRNA in the human genome, fewer than are present for Cas9 nucleases (>90). Most Cpf1 off-target cleavage sites did not produce mutations in cells. We found mismatches in either the 3' PAM-distal region or in the PAM sequence of 12 off-target sites that were validated in vivo. Off-target effects were completely abrogated by using preassembled, recombinant Cpf1 ribonucleoproteins.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells

            The activities and genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases 1 are not well defined. We show that two Cpf1 nucleases from Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6 and Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 (AsCpf1 and LbCpf1, respectively) have on-target efficiencies in human cells comparable with those of the widely used Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) 2–5 . We also report that four to six bases at the 3’ end of the short CRISPR RNA (crRNA) used to program Cpf1 nucleases are insensitive to single base mismatches, but that many of the other bases in this region of the crRNA are highly sensitive to single or double substitutions. Using GUIDE-seq and targeted deep sequencing analyses performed with both Cpf1 nucleases, we were unable to detect off-target cleavage for more than half of 20 different crRNAs. Our results suggest that AsCpf1 and LbCpf1 are highly specific in human cells.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Activity-Induced DNA Breaks Govern the Expression of Neuronal Early-Response Genes.

              Neuronal activity causes the rapid expression of immediate early genes that are crucial for experience-driven changes to synapses, learning, and memory. Here, using both molecular and genome-wide next-generation sequencing methods, we report that neuronal activity stimulation triggers the formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in the promoters of a subset of early-response genes, including Fos, Npas4, and Egr1. Generation of targeted DNA DSBs within Fos and Npas4 promoters is sufficient to induce their expression even in the absence of an external stimulus. Activity-dependent DSB formation is likely mediated by the type II topoisomerase, Topoisomerase IIβ (Topo IIβ), and knockdown of Topo IIβ attenuates both DSB formation and early-response gene expression following neuronal stimulation. Our results suggest that DSB formation is a physiological event that rapidly resolves topological constraints to early-response gene expression in neurons.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-1723
                12 May 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 15058
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
                [2 ]Graduate Program in Biophysics, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
                [3 ]Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
                [4 ]Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm SE-17165, Sweden
                [5 ]McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                [6 ]Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                [7 ]Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-6108
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9760-6292
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-0327
                Article
                ncomms15058
                10.1038/ncomms15058
                5437291
                28497783
                ad1ca09d-f5bc-459f-ab09-1223e935dff8
                Copyright © 2017, The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 17 January 2017
                : 17 February 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article