4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between daptomycin susceptibility and teicoplanin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Staphylococcus epidermidis infections are a common occurrence in hospitals, particularly in catheter-related bloodstream and surgical site infections and infective endocarditis. Higher daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values may be associated with daptomycin treatment failure among patients with S. epidermidis infections. We therefore conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the predictive value of daptomycin susceptibility. A retrospective study was undertaken in 1,337 patients with S. epidermidis infections. Data were collected from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2016 at Ehime University Hospital, and included the following clinicopathological factors for evaluation: age, sex, resistance to vancomycin or teicoplanin, and history of antimicrobial therapy. Multiple analysis was performed using logistic regression to identify factors that independently and significantly affected the daptomycin resistance. Daptomycin-resistant S. epidermidis was identified in 38 (2.8%) patients. According to the multiple analysis, only higher MIC values (≥16 mg/L) for teicoplanin ( P < 0.0001) were independently associated with an increased risk of developing daptomycin resistance. In conclusion, higher teicoplanin MIC values may predict resistance to daptomycin treatment in S. epidermidis infections.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

          Vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is not uncommon, even when MRSA is susceptible to vancomycin. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration has any influence on the mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia. A total of 414 episodes of MRSA bacteremia were prospectively followed-up from 1991 through 2005. MIC of vancomycin for the first isolate was determined by E-test. Clinical variables recorded were age, comorbidity, prior administration of vancomycin, use of corticosteroids, prognosis of underlying disease, source of bacteremia, the need for mechanical ventilation, shock, and mortality. A "treatment group" variable was created and defined as follows: (1) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1 microg/mL (38 episodes), (2) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1.5 microg/mL (90 episodes), (3) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (40 episodes), and (4) receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (246 episodes). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Episodes caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL were independently associated with a lower risk of shock (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.75). Multivariate analysis selected receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (OR, 6.39; 95% CI, 1.68-24.3), receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.20-10.9), increasing age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04), use of corticosteroids (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.04-3.29), an ultimately (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 2.85-36.8) or rapidly (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.10) fatal underlying disease, high-risk (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.89-6.88) and intermediate-risk (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.17-4.04) sources of bacteremia, and shock (OR, 7.38; 95% CI, 4.11-13.3) as the best predictors of mortality. Mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia was significantly higher when the empirical antibiotic was inappropriate and when vancomycin was empirically used for treatment of infection with strains with a high vancomycin MIC (>1 microg/mL).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Role of coagulase-negative staphylococci in human disease.

            Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) are normal inhabitants of human skin and mucous membranes. They have long been dismissed as culture contaminants, but now the potentially important role of CNS as pathogens and their increasing incidence has been recognized. Approximately 55-75% of nosocomial isolates is methicillin resistant. CNS were the first organisms in which glycopeptide resistance was recognized. In the immunocompetent host, CNS endocarditis and urinary tract infections with Staphylococcus saprophyticus are the most common CNS infections. Other patients are usually immunocompromised, with indwelling or implanted foreign bodies. CNS account for approximately 30% of all nosocomial blood stream infections. The majority of these concern catheter-related sepsis. Other important infections due to CNS include central nervous system shunt infections, endophthalmitis, surgical site infections, peritonitis in patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and foreign body infections. CNS are rarely associated with mastitis in humans. Staphylococcus lugdunensis is more pathogenic than other CNS as it expresses several potential virulence factors. The distinction between clinically significant, pathogenic and contaminating isolates is a major problem. Several studies show clonal intra and inter hospital spread of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains which suggests that infection control measures may be necessary for multiresistant CNS isolates as for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. As a result of medical progress, mainly due to the use of invasive and indwelling medical devices, CNS are now a major cause of nosocomial and health-care related infections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Correlation between Reduced Daptomycin Susceptibility and Vancomycin Resistance in Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

              We present here findings of a strong positive correlation between reduced daptomycin susceptibility and vancomycin resistance in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). This correlation is related to cell wall thickening, suggesting that, similar to the case with vancomycin resistance in VISA, the physical barrier of a thickened cell wall may contribute to daptomycin resistance in S. aureus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                swatanab@g.matsuyama-u.ac.jp
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                6 December 2019
                6 December 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 18533
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0698 1362, GRID grid.411613.0, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, , Matsuyama University, ; 4-2 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8578 Japan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0621 7227, GRID grid.452478.8, Division of Pharmacy, , Ehime University Hospital, ; 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295 Japan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0621 7227, GRID grid.452478.8, Department of Infection Control, , Ehime University Hospital, ; 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295 Japan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1011 3808, GRID grid.255464.4, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, , Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, ; 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295 Japan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0621 7227, GRID grid.452478.8, Research Promotion Unit, Translation Research Center, , Ehime University Hospital, ; 454 Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295 Japan
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0698 1362, GRID grid.411613.0, Department of Infectious Disease, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, , Matsuyama University, ; 4-2 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8578 Japan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0617 524X, GRID grid.412589.3, School of Pharmacy, , Shujitsu University, ; 1-6-1 Nishigawara, Naka-ku, Okayama, Okayama, 703-8516 Japan
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9154-0162
                Article
                55149
                10.1038/s41598-019-55149-z
                6898446
                31811214
                ad25eee1-2dbf-4555-afda-1f8ff725f44b
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 February 2019
                : 23 November 2019
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Uncategorized
                bacterial infection,risk factors
                Uncategorized
                bacterial infection, risk factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article