6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Time Trends of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

      research-article
      a , b , c , c , c , d , c , i , o , c , c , e , f , g , f , a , a , h , i , j , k , l , k , l , m , n , d , a , *
      Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
      IOS Press
      Aβ42, biomarkers, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, neurofilament light, neurogranin, P-tau, T-tau

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Longitudinal changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are seldom studied. Furthermore, data on biomarker gradient between lumbar (L-) and ventricular (V-) compartments seems to be discordant.

          Objective:

          To examine alteration of CSF biomarkers reflecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-related amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation, tau pathology, neurodegeneration, and early synaptic degeneration by CSF shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) in relation to AD-related changes in brain biopsy. In addition, biomarker levels in L- and V-CSF were compared.

          Methods:

          L-CSF was collected prior to shunt placement and, together with V-CSF, 3–73 months after surgery. Thereafter, additional CSF sampling took place at 3, 6, and 18 months after the baseline sample from 26 iNPH patients with confirmed Aβ plaques in frontal cortical brain biopsy and 13 iNPH patients without Aβ pathology. CSF Amyloid-β 42 (Aβ 42), total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau 181), neurofilament light (NFL), and neurogranin (NRGN) were analyzed with customized ELISAs.

          Results:

          All biomarkers but Aβ 42 increased notably by 140–810% in L-CSF after CSF diversion and then stabilized. Aβ 42 instead showed divergent longitudinal decrease between Aβ-positive and -negative patients in L-CSF, and thereafter increase in Aβ-negative iNPH patients in both L- and V-CSF. All five biomarkers correlated highly between V-CSF and L-CSF (Aβ 42 R = 0.87, T-tau R = 0.83, P-tau R = 0.92, NFL R = 0.94, NRGN R = 0.9; all p < 0.0001) but were systematically lower in V-CSF (Aβ 42 14 %, T-tau 22%, P-tau 20%, NFL 32%, NRGN 19%). With APOE genotype-grouping, only Aβ 42 showed higher concentration in non-carriers of allele ɛ4.

          Conclusion:

          Longitudinal follow up shows that after an initial post-surgery increase, T-tau, P-tau, and NRGN are stable in iNPH patients regardless of brain biopsy Aβ pathology, while NFL normalized toward its pre-shunt levels. Aβ 42 as biomarker seems to be the least affected by the surgical procedure or shunt and may be the best predictor of AD risk in iNPH patients. All biomarker concentrations were lower in V- than L-CSF yet showing strong correlations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease

          In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a “research framework” because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alzheimer's disease.

            Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia. Research advances have enabled detailed understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of the hallmarks of the disease--ie, plaques, composed of amyloid beta (Abeta), and tangles, composed of hyperphosphorylated tau. However, as our knowledge increases so does our appreciation for the pathogenic complexity of the disorder. Familial Alzheimer's disease is a very rare autosomal dominant disease with early onset, caused by mutations in the amyloid precursor protein and presenilin genes, both linked to Abeta metabolism. By contrast with familial disease, sporadic Alzheimer's disease is very common with more than 15 million people affected worldwide. The cause of the sporadic form of the disease is unknown, probably because the disease is heterogeneous, caused by ageing in concert with a complex interaction of both genetic and environmental risk factors. This seminar reviews the key aspects of the disease, including epidemiology, genetics, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as recent developments and controversies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are important for early diagnosis in routine clinical practice and research. Three core CSF biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (Aβ42, T-tau, and P-tau) have been assessed in numerous studies, and several other Alzheimer's disease markers are emerging in the literature. However, there have been no comprehensive meta-analyses of their diagnostic performance. We systematically reviewed the literature for 15 biomarkers in both CSF and blood to assess which of these were most altered in Alzheimer's disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Alzheimers Dis
                J Alzheimers Dis
                JAD
                Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
                IOS Press (Nieuwe Hemweg 6B, 1013 BG Amsterdam, The Netherlands )
                1387-2877
                1875-8908
                9 March 2021
                20 April 2021
                2021
                : 80
                : 4
                : 1629-1642
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Clinical Medicine –Neurosurgery, University of Eastern Finland and Department of Neurosurgery , Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
                [b ]UCB, Braine-l’Alleud, Belgium
                [c ]Janssen Research & Development, A Division of Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium
                [d ]Janssen Research & Development, La Jolla, CA, USA
                [e ]Institute of Clinical Medicine –Pathology, University of Eastern Finland and Department of Pathology , Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
                [f ]Institute of Clinical Medicine –Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Department of Neurology , Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
                [g ]Department of Neurosciences, University of Helsinki , Helsinki, Finland and Department of Geriatrics, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland
                [h ]Institute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland , Kuopio, Finland
                [i ]Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp , Antwerp, Belgium
                [j ]Department of Neurology and Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
                [k ]Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska Academy Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
                [l ]Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg , Mölndal, Sweden
                [m ]UCL Institute of Neurology, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, University College London , Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
                [n ] UK Dementia Research Institute , London, United Kingdom
                [o ]AC Immune SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Ville Leinonen, MD, PhD, Department of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, FI-70029 KYS, Finland. Tel.: +358 44 717 2303; Fax: +358 17 173 916; E-mails: ville.leinonen@ 123456kuh.fi and ville.leinonen@ 123456uef.fi .
                Article
                JAD201361
                10.3233/JAD-201361
                8150674
                33720890
                ad3cb3d6-c331-4c76-a5e4-5a2e3c0f54e2
                © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 8 February 2021
                Categories
                Research Article

                aβ42,biomarkers,idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus,neurofilament light,neurogranin,p-tau,t-tau

                Comments

                Comment on this article