32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Neurologic Serious Adverse Events Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone in Advanced Melanoma, Including a Case Series of Encephalitis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Melanoma is a particularly immunogenic cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been extensively studied in this tumor type. This review focuses on the incidence of serious neurologic immune‐related adverse events, specifically encephalitis, in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab alone or in sequence or combination with ipilimumab. Practical guidance is provided for the diagnosis and management of treatment‐related encephalitis associated with nivolumab and ipilimumab.

          Abstract

          Background.

          Despite unprecedented efficacy across multiple tumor types, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is associated with a unique and wide spectrum of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), including neurologic events ranging from mild headache to potentially life‐threatening encephalitis. Here, we summarize neurologic irAEs associated with nivolumab and ipilimumab melanoma treatment, present cases of treatment‐related encephalitis, and provide practical guidance on diagnosis and management.

          Methods.

          We searched a Global Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology database for neurologic irAEs reported over an 8‐year period in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab with or without ipilimumab from 12 studies sponsored by Bristol‐Myers Squibb. Serious neurologic irAEs were reviewed, and relationship to nivolumab or ipilimumab was assigned.

          Results.

          In our search of 3,763 patients, 35 patients (0.93%) presented with 43 serious neurologic irAEs, including neuropathy ( n = 22), noninfective meningitis ( n = 5), encephalitis ( n = 6), neuromuscular disorders ( n = 3), and nonspecific adverse events ( n = 7). Study drug was discontinued ( n = 20), interrupted ( n = 8), or unchanged ( n = 7). Most neurologic irAEs resolved (26/35 patients; 75%). Overall, median time to onset was 45 days (range 1–170) and to resolution was 32 days (2–809+). Median time to onset of encephalitis was 55.5 days (range 18–297); four cases resolved and one was fatal.

          Conclusion.

          Both oncologists and neurologists need to be aware of signs and symptoms of serious but uncommon neurologic irAEs associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Prompt diagnosis and management using an established algorithm are critical to minimize serious complications from these neurologic irAEs.

          Implications for Practice.

          With increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer, practicing oncologists need to be aware of the potential risk of neurologic immune‐related adverse events and be able to provide prompt treatment of this uncommon, but potentially serious, class of adverse events. We summarize neurologic adverse events related to nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma from 12 studies and examine in depth 6 cases of encephalitis. We also provide input and guidance on the existing neurologic adverse events management algorithm for nivolumab and ipilimumab.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          James.larkin@rmh.nhs.uk
          Journal
          Oncologist
          Oncologist
          10.1002/(ISSN)1549-490X
          The Oncologist
          oncologist
          theoncologist
          The Oncologist
          AlphaMed Press
          1083-7159
          1549-490X
          11 May 2017
          June 2017
          : 22
          : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/onco.v22.6 )
          : 709-718
          Affiliations
          [ a ] The Royal Marsden , London, United Kingdom
          [ b ] University of California Los Angeles Medical Center , Santa Monica, California, USA
          [ c ] University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
          [ d ] Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
          [ e ] Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
          [ f ] New York University Langone Medical Center , New York, New York, USA
          [ g ] University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center , Utrecht, Netherlands
          [ h ] Hospital Mae de Deus , Porto Alegre, Brazil
          [ i ] Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Princeton , New Jersey, USA
          Author notes

          Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

          [*] [* ]Correspondence: James Larkin, M.D., Ph.D., The Royal Marsden, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom. Telephone: 02078082198; e‐mail: James.larkin@ 123456rmh.nhs.uk
          Article
          PMC5469590 PMC5469590 5469590 ONCO12130
          10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0487
          5469590
          28495807
          ad58cca0-6e05-4401-a13d-f9d9dd99bbc8
          © AlphaMed Press 2017
          History
          : 07 December 2016
          : 02 February 2017
          Page count
          Pages: 10
          Categories
          1
          17
          Melanoma and Cutaneous Malignancies

          Encephalitis,Neurologic adverse events,Immune‐related adverse events,Melanoma,Immune checkpoint inhibitors,Case series

          Comments

          Comment on this article