11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Expertise in Clinical Psychology. The Effects of University Training and Practical Experience on Expertise in Clinical Psychology

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          How do university training and subsequent practical experience affect expertise in clinical psychology? To answer this question we developed methods to assess psychological knowledge and the competence to diagnose, construct case conceptualizations, and plan psychotherapeutic treatment: a knowledge test and short case studies in a first study, and a complex, dynamically evolving case study in the second study. In our cross-sectional studies, psychology students, trainees in a certified postgraduate psychotherapist curriculum, and behavior therapists with more than 10 years of experience were tested (100 in total: 20 each of novice, intermediate, and advanced university students, postgraduate trainees, and therapists). Clinical knowledge and competence increased up to the level of trainees but unexpectedly decreased at the level of experienced therapists. We discuss the results against the background of expertise research and the training of clinical psychologists (in Germany). Important factors for the continuing professional development of psychotherapists are proposed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence-based practice in psychology.

            (2006)
            The evidence-based practice movement has become an important feature of health care systems and health care policy. Within this context, the APA 2005 Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice defines and discusses evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP). In an integration of science and practice, the Task Force's report describes psychology's fundamental commitment to sophisticated EBPP and takes into account the full range of evidence psychologists and policymakers must consider. Research, clinical expertise, and patient characteristics are all supported as relevant to good outcomes. EBPP promotes effective psychological practice and enhances public health by applying empirically supported principles of psychological assessment, case formulation, therapeutic relationship, and intervention. The report provides a rationale for and expanded discussion of the EBPP policy statement that was developed by the Task Force and adopted as association policy by the APA Council of Representatives in August 2005. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On the Role of Biomedical Knowledge in Clinical Reasoning by Experts, Intermediates and Novices

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                04 February 2013
                27 March 2013
                2013
                : 4
                : 141
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Susan G. Simpson, University of South Australia, Australia

                Reviewed by: Susan G. Simpson, University of South Australia, Australia; Julian B. Nesci, Austin Health, Australia

                *Correspondence: Hans Spada, Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstraße 41, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany. e-mail: spada@ 123456psychologie.uni-freiburg.de

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Psychology for Clinical Settings, a specialty of Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00141
                3608920
                23543213
                ad9805dc-bb37-4145-9141-76bcf6c8799d
                Copyright © 2013 Vollmer, Spada, Caspar and Burri.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 23 January 2013
                : 05 March 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 27, Pages: 12, Words: 10498
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                expertise,experience,clinical knowledge,clinical competencies,behavior therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article